yelp

Forget Foursquare, Yelp’s Where It’s At

As you might have discovered in previous posts, I’m not a big Foursquare fan.

My lack of enthusiasm has much to do with the fact it doesn’t seem to provided much value other than the “thrill” of getting badges. TThat’s not enough to go through the trouble of broadcasting my location. Granted, Foursquare appears to be getting better as it makes deals with content players and corporate partners but I still don’t see enough “meat”.

A service that has a lot more appeal while offering many of the same features as Foursquare is Yelp. Until recently, I hadn’t been much of a Yelp user but the more I user it, the more value delivers. For example, I’m visiting New York this weekend and despite doing some research, I’m unprepared when it comes to knowing where to go and what to eat.

This is where Yelp comes into play, particularly when using the iPhone app. By using the search or nearby features, Yelp makes it easy to find places to eat, visit, drink, have coffee, banks, etc. There’s also reviews from users, and, get this, the ability to check in when visiting places.

The biggest challenge facing Foursquare is it needs to move into places where there’s already strong competition. The fact Foursquare has built its foothold on being able the check-in may not be enough of a differentiator to fend off players such as Yelp, Facebook and Google that are moving into the location-based market.

Foursquare’s growing popularity has always been puzzling to me because the original value proposition was so one-dimensional. And despite Foursquare’s continued growth, the reality is it still doesn’t have the traction that everyone expected when it burst onto the scene.

To me Foursquare feels like a lot like Friendster, which had its day in the sun before becoming a second-tier social network.

FourWhere Opens the Location Door

One of the biggest issues with the growing number of location-based services (Foursquare, Gowalla, Yelp, Blippy, etc.) is how difficult it can be to be a “watcher” as opposed to a “participant”. Many people, including myself, have no interest in broadcasting their locations publicly, but would be interested in seeing what other people are doing and what they have to say about the places they visit.

The solution to the watch vs. participate dilemma is FourWhere, a free service created by Sysomos (a client) that makes it easy to see the places visited and commented on by people using Foursquare, Yelp and Gowalla. Using data from the three services and the Google Maps API, FourWhere provides a user-friendly way to access the location-based world without having to register for Foursquare, Yelp, Gowalla or FourWhere itself.

FourWhere is easy to use. All you do is search for a city or address. When you click on any of the red dots on the map, comments appear about a particular location from Foursquare, Gowalla or Yelp users.

FourWhere launched in March featuring information from Foursquare. The response was so enthusiastic that work soon started adding Yelp and Gowalla, and updated version of FourWhere launched earlier this week.

For more coverage of FourWhere, check out CNet in which John Lowensohn said he:

“really like the idea of having one place that aggregates not only the tips from these sites, but, more importantly, the check-ins. When done right, and given a sense of time, Fourwhere could prove itself as a very powerful tool for showing what’s hot and what’s not based on a much larger group of users than any of the three services could offer on their own.”

Is There Anything Google Won’t Buy or Offer?

According to TechCrunch, Google is looking to buy Yelp for $500-million, a move that would boost Google’s presence in the local search and directory business.

Maybe it’s just me but over the past few months, Google’s strategy to take over the world is becoming more evident. If it’s not acquisitions (60 and counting), it’s new (and free!) services such as Google DNS or the recently-unveiled Goo.gl URL shortening service.

This may sound naive given that capitalism is capitalism but does Google need to own everything and offer every online service? Doesn’t it make sense to leave some scraps for competitors so that there’s still some competition?

Don’t get me wrong, Google offers some terrific (and free!) service but the bigger it gets, the more nervous it makes me because it doesn’t seem healthy to have one super-dominant player – even one that professes to not be evil.

Rather than just talking the talk, I’m going to walk the walk by giving up Google for a week to see what life would be like if Google suddenly disappeared.

More: Boomtown suggests Google could also be interested in moving into the real-estate search market by buying Trulia.

Anyone out there not use any Google services?

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...