utility

What’s More Important to Startups: Design or Utility?

Over the past few weeks, there has been an interesting debate raging about design versus utility for startups looking to capture the spotlight.

The key issues are whether the look and feel of a service is more important than how it actually works. If a service looks crappy, does it impact its appeal, or can a service be compelling even with bad design?

The issue was thrust into the spotlight when entrepreneur and developer Jon Yongfook Cockle published a post that “design is horseshit”. At the core of his thesis is the belief “design enhances value, it does not create it”, and startups that create a sparkly products that don’t solve a problem aren’t creating value.

It was not surprising to Cockle’s post struck a chord given how enamoured we’ve become with design – a trend stoked by our good friends at Apple. It explains why there are posts such as “Silicon Valley’s New Secret Weapon: Designers Who Found Startups” and “Did you know about billions worth of value created by tech startups with designer co-founders?”

To me, there has to be equilibrium between design and utility because one can’t thrive without the other. For startups, it’s a tough balancing act because consumers are fickle and time-strapped so first impressions (aka design) are important. At the same time, consumers are also quick recognize if a well-designed Web site offers little value (aka putting lipstick on a pig).

Yes, I’m fence-sitting but design and utility are important to startups. But if I were to choose I’d go with utility over design. Why? There’s so much competition that startup need to do solve a problem, make something easier, or delight. Otherwise, people will simply move on to the next service.

If forced to choose, I would politely suggest a valuable service with  a modicum of design has a better chance of resonating than a beautiful service that is little more than eye-candy.

Of course, the best startups not only offer something of value and good design but strong messaging, creative branding and a flair for positioning themselves with target audiences.

What do you think? What’s more important? Design or utility?

For more on design vs. utility, check out this blog post on .Net.

Facebook: A Necessary Evil?

In the wake of Facebook announcing it now has 500 million "active" users, there has been another wave of dissertations and discussions about Facebook's growing presence and how/why people are using it.

In the New York Times, Joshua Brustein had an excellent column talking about how Facebook has become a utility for many people, which explains why it has become one of the least popular private-sector companies (along with cable companies and wireless telephone companies).

Facebook’s role as a utility (something Mark Zuckerberg has been talking about for several years) goes a long way in explaining the service’s appeal. While Facebook has some sizzle in terms of features, it thrives by offering basic communication tools so people can easily stay in touch with friends and family, and companies can engage with consumers.

Like a utility, Facebook meets meat-and-potato needs. It is why people use it on a regular/daily basis, much like they use the telephone or electricity. It may be that many people don’t like using Facebook but they have no choice given it has become one of the ways people are communicating online.

In other words, Facebook has become a necessary evil. Not that there’s anything wrong with that, especially if you’re Facebook and its investors.

Personally, I’m ambivalent about Facebook. I have a personal account and Facebook Page but Facebook is a professional tool for me. It is not a service in which I share a lot of personal details but, then again, I don’t use social media that way. As well, I’m not part of the younger demographic happy to publicly share anything and everything.

Despite my reservations about Facebook, it serves a definite role, which is why I’m a regular user. For me, it’s a business and professional utility. This is the key part of Facebook’s appeal – it fills a different role for different people, depending on your interests and needs.

In that sense, Facebook is the ultimate digital utility that everybody uses even though they may not particularly like the company providing the service. Facebook may not really care whether you like them or not; all it cares about is if you use the service on a regular basis as opposed to rivals such as MySpace, Friendster, Orkut, etc.

Links:
- Facebook is to the Power Company as…. (The New York Times)
- Facebook: Can’t Love it, can’t live with out it (Globe & Mail)

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...