tweetdeck

Twitter’s Purchase of TweetDeck is a No-Brainer

In February when it appeared that Bill Gross’ Ubermedia had purchased TweetDeck, the most popular third-party service to use Twitter, it seemed like a huge coup for Ubermedia and a major strategic blunder by Twitter.

With about 5% of the market for people looking read and publish tweets, TweetDeck was the biggest prize for anyone looking to establish a strong foothold within the TwitterSphere. So when Ubermedia apparently agreed to acquire TweetDeck for $30-million, it looked like Bill Gross had outmaneuvered Twitter. At the same time, it was also more evidence of how Twitter has been stumbling strategically, highlighted by the fact it has failed to make acquisitions that seem like no-brainers (e.g. TwitPic, Bit.ly)

But now it appears the Ubermedia-Tweetdeck deal was never consummated, and that Twitter is now in discussions to buy TweetDeck for $50 million, according to the Wall St. Journal.

A Twitter-TweetDeck deal makes complete sense, mostly because Twitter.com sucks as a way. While Twitter claimed earlier this year that 90% of Twitter users used “official” Twitter applications, a study by Sysomos (a client) found that only 58% of people use official Twitter applications to tweet.

Twitter would never admit it but Twitter.com continues to be a low-frills platform to use Twitter, while dozens of third-party companies such as Tweetdeck, Hootsuite and Seesmic have developed much more feature-rich, user-friendly and more interesting services and applications.

In theory, Twitter should have acquired TweetDeck long ago when it became apparent it was becoming the most popular way to use Twitter other than Twitter.com.

When UberMedia made its move for Tweetdeck, it was a shot across the bow for Twitter given that UberMedia has emerged as a pesky rival after acquiring a portfolio of applications and services. In many ways, Twitter had little choice but to acquire Tweetdeck with some of its venture capital booty.

The winner in this battle between UberMedia and Twitter is TweetDeck founder Iain Dodsworth (left) who has found himself as the belle of the ball. Armed with $4-million venture capital from the Accelerator Group, Betaworks, Ron Conway and Howard Lindzon, Tweetdeck’s popularity has been propelled by its growing number of features, including the ability to create multiple tabs to monitor direct messages, lists and keywords searches.

For more on the TweetDeck-Twitter discussions, check out VentureBeat and GigaOm.

Huh? Twitter Didn’t Buy TweetDeck?

One of the games Twitter-watchers like to play is creating lists of the company’s potential acquisitions now that it has gazillions of venture capital cash. The lists includes TweetDeck, TwitPic, TwitVid, Seesmic and HootSuite.

TweetDeck can be crossed off the list now that it has been purchased by UberMedia for $30-million. For people not familiar with UberMedia, it’s owned by Bill Gross, who started a search company called Overture. And for those of you not familiar with Overture, it created the pay-per-click model that Google “borrowed” to give itself a business model.

Without much attention, Gross has started to build an intriguing portfolio of Twitter products that now includes UberTwitter, a popular Twitter app for the Blackberry and iPhone; UberCurrent, a tool to follow influencers on Twitter; and Twitdroyd, a popular app for Android phones.

The sale of TweetDeck, which has raised $5-million in venture capital, begs a few questions:

1. Why didn’t Twitter buy TweetDeck? Given the declining use of Twitter.com, which is still far from user-friendly despite the recent overhaul, it would have made a lot of sense to buy TweetDeck, the world’s leading Twitter platform. For my clients, it’s the way that I suggest they publish and monitor Twitter, mostly because of how it allows for multiple columns to track keywords. I also like how TweetDeck can be used to publisher updates on other platforms such as Facebook, Foursquare and LinkedIn.

2. If not TweetDeck, are there any start-ups that Twitter is interested in buying. Maybe it’s Vancouver-based HootSuite, which is seeing strong growth in terms of users and revenue. HootSuite has a good relationship with Twitter, and it was picked to showcase Twitter’s Promoted Tweets feature.

3. So what does Bill Gross do with TweetDeck, which has been searching for a business model since it was launched to instant acclaim in 2008? Does he start to insert some kind of advertising into the application, including in-stream advertising? Does he create an enterprise version of the product to compete with companies such as HootSuite and CoTweet? Does he create a premium version of TweetDeck with more features? You have to believe there are many people who would happily pay a one-time fee or maybe an annual subscription to access more features.

4. With TweetDeck off the table how long will it be before some of the other popular publishing applications – Seesmic, CoTweet, HootSuite – are snapped up?

For more thoughts on the UberMedia-TweetDeck deal, check out Louis Gray, who notes that it took less than 1,000 days for TweetDeck to go from “public consciousness” to acquisition. Business Insider also has some thoughts.

The Decline of Twitter.com; Not Twitter

cinderellaFor many people, Twitter is like Cinderella – the belle of the ball who will suddenly become a servant-girl again at the stroke of midnight. It explains why there’s a steady flow of reports that Twitter has plateaued or that Twitter is in decline whenever a report from Nielsen, comScore or Compete is published.

The latest “Cinderella” story comes from eMarketer, which breathlessly asks “Tweeting No More?” based on a 27.8% decline in unique visitors to Twitter.com in October, compared with September. While that number is large, there are likely several reasons to explain some or most of the decline.

The most obvious is the growing popularity of non-Twitter.com services and applications such as Tweetdeck, Seesmic, HootSuite, CoTweet, Thwirl, Tweetie, Twitterrific, Brizzly and SplitTweet. While Twitter has dabbled in making changes to Twitter.com, external developers are raced ahead with much better products that come with more useful and compelling bells and whistles.

For many people, Twitter.com is like a bike with training wheels. Once they have the hang of Twitter, many people move on to something else. While Twitter.com has added some new wrinkles recently such as Lists, it’s simply not good enough to maintain its place as the place where active Twitter users hang out.

In many respects, this is another one of those Twitter head-scratchers: the willingness to let others be innovative and, in the process, poach traffic coming to Twitter.com. Why, for example, has Twitter not used any of its venture capital booty to create an AIR application to compete with Tweetdeck or Seesmic. Where’s the ability to manage multiple accounts to compete against CoTweet or SplitTweet? Where’s the super-cool wireless application to battle Twitterrific? For all the talk about Twitter monetizing itself with ads, traffic to monetize those ads is slipping away.

Another interesting consideration is that according to a recent study by Sysomos (a client), Twitter.com’s market share has stayed flat over the past five months at about 46%.

So, how do you correlate flat market share with declining traffic?

Maybe it has to do with the data being crunched. Given the large ecosystem and the different ways people are using Twitter, it may be that getting view of the TwitterSphere is difficult, if not impossible. For all we know, the data collected by Nielsen, comScore and Compete may be inaccurate….or not.

108617

106719

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...