premium

When Pulling the Trigger on Premium is a No-Brainer

For all the talk about the freemium business model, the key issue is how consumers can be convinced to upgrade from free to paid. For many companies, the free-to-paid gap is enormous because consumers are so enthralled with free that paying for an online service is difficult to justify, even if the service is useful and valuable.

Among the freemium advocates, their optimism is based on the belief the model can work because lots of users can be attracted to a free service, and that only a small percentage – 5% to 10% – need to upgrade to a paid service. Of course, this is easier said than done because 5% seems like such a small number, it should be do-able if the service is any good.

The problem is the vast majority consumers find that free meets all of their needs, so premium is an unnecessary move. This leaves a company with lots of users completely content to pay nothing forever.

So, how do companies bridge the gap between free and paid? How do they provide a great service that still leaves room for consumers to justify eventually paying for something more. The reality is there’s no easy answer, which is why freemium is just as much art as science.

I started thinking about freemium after upgrading to Dropbox Pro 50. The free service was terrific but having only 2GB of capacity quickly became unworkable after Dropbox became a key way to do business with clients and partners. There was simply no work to continue using the free version of Dropbox, which made it easy to upgrade to the 50GB package for $99/year.

To be honest, it was a decision that didn’t happen right away. My immediate response to hitting the 2GB capacity limit was to delete unnecessary files and folders. Of course, this was like to trying to stop in a leak in a dyke with a band-aid so I finally sucked it up and did the right thing by upgrading.

In hindsight, it was a no-brainer decision because ROI on paying $10/month for a premium service will be high. In the scheme of things, it’s a small line item within the ME Consulting empire.

It is interesting, however, that I had to think about it before pulling the trigger. In some respects, this epitomizes the freemium dilemma. Even when it’s completely obvious that upgrading to a premium service has to happen, it doesn’t automatically happen.

Newspapers Must Charge for Online Content

As the newspaper industry grapples with how to embrace the Web and remain financially viable, I’ve become increasingly convinced newspapers must charge for content in some way, shape or form.

To some, this is a strange approach given premium services have been a failure, which is why most newspapers are still trying to drive online revenue through advertising. Meanwhile, more newspapers are disappearing or becoming streamlined, online-only operations.

The biggest argument against the ability for newspapers to charge for premium access is consumers will turn elsewhere for the newspapers they want.

In many respects, this is accurate, which is why newspapers need to focus on charging for value-added content (columns, features, archives, editorials, inside access) that aren’t available through the Web.

Of course, many newspapers may not have the luxury of offering content people want to pay to read. But I think some the world’s leading newspapers such as the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Financial Times, Telegraph and The Guardian can successfully pull it off.

If you look a look at the blogosphere, for example, it’s the major newspapers that attract the most links. This suggests newspapers are writing the most interesting content, which should be a pretty good indication it has some value.

My theory is the major newspapers will start to introduce premium services soon. Janet Robinson, CEO with the New York Times Co., said earlier this week that premium services are being explored that are “centered on a metered model and a Times membership model with special offerings.”

Meanwhile, the Financial Times has quietly launched a new system whereby online readers need to register. There are two free packages, as well as premium packages that sell for $3.49 and $5.75 a week.

You have to know media mogul Rupert Murdoch is watching carefully, and it’s only a matter of time before the Wall St. Journal, the New York Post and The Times launch premium services.

If the New York Times, Wall St. Journal, Financial Times and others go premium, it will likely encourage more newspapers and magazines to offer premium services as well.

The pendulum is slowly starting to swing from free to fee. It’s not going to be widespread or swing all the way back to fee but the free-for-all is coming to an end for many major publications.

For more, check out VentureBeat and ValleyWag, which talks about New York Times Silver and Gold packages that could be sold for $150 and $300 respectively.


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...