<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mark Evans Tech &#187; VOIP Services, Competition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/category/voip-services-competition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Startups, Entrepreneurs and the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:30:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tired of Being a Digital Peasant!</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/03/31/tired-of-being-a-digital-peasant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/03/31/tired-of-being-a-digital-peasant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Telecom Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOIP Services, Competition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It wasn&#8217;t that long ago that Canada was considered to be on the leading-edge of the Web. We had the highest penetration when it came to high-speed access, and the regulator &#8211; aka the CTRC &#8211; had decided not to regulate the Internet. Today, Canada is falling behind and, in the process, we&#8217;re becoming digital [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/03/31/tired-of-being-a-digital-peasant/' addthis:title='Tired of Being a Digital Peasant! ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/skype-logo-5.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/skype-logo-5.jpg' rel="prettyPhoto[4618]",'popup','width=91,height=91,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/skype-logo-5-tm.jpg" height="100" width="100" border="0" align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" alt="Skype" title="Skype" /></a><br />
It wasn&#8217;t that long ago that Canada was considered to be on the leading-edge of the Web.</p>
<p>We had the highest penetration when it came to high-speed access, and the regulator &#8211; aka the CTRC &#8211; had decided not to regulate the Internet.</p>
<p>Today, Canada is falling behind and, in the process, we&#8217;re becoming digital peasants.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most frustrating is our inability to access cool new services. You want to listen to music using Pandara? Forget about it; not available in Canada. You want to watch TV using Hulu? Forget about it; not available.</p>
<p>The latest slap in face is the fact Canadians won&#8217;t be able to use <a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/skype-works-on-3G-3.0">Skype on their iPhones</a>. So for all of you excited on Skype&#8217;s new foray into the mobile world, forget about it; not available.</p>
<p>Chaim Haas, a public relations representative acting on behalf of Skype, told <a href="%0Ahttp://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/03/30/skype-iphone.html">the CBC </a>that the application is available in every country in which the iPhone is on sale and in which Apple has an iTunes Store — with the exception of Canada.</p>
<p>Haas said this is because of patent-licence restrictions but would not elaborate except to specify that it is a patent issue related to Skype, not Apple.</p>
<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t care about patent issues. What I care about is using leading-edge and innovative services, and the lack of Skype is just another example of how Canada is becoming an online backwater.</p>
<p><!-- technorati tags start -->
<p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/skype" rel="tag">skype</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/VoIP" rel="tag">VoIP</a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags end --></p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/03/31/tired-of-being-a-digital-peasant/' addthis:title='Tired of Being a Digital Peasant! ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/03/31/tired-of-being-a-digital-peasant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Skype or Not to Skype?</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/13/to-skype-or-not-to-skype/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/13/to-skype-or-not-to-skype/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 17:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[VOIP Services, Competition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;d think judging by this BusinessWeek article that Skype is a strategic albatross hanging around eBay&#8217;s neck. Yes, Ebay overpaid for Skype. And it hasn&#8217;t panned out strategically if the goal was giving eBay sellers a new communications tool. But Skype has seen tremendous growth with 335 million registered users and projected revenue this year [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/13/to-skype-or-not-to-skype/' addthis:title='To Skype or Not to Skype? ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/skype-logo-4.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/skype-logo-4.jpg' rel="prettyPhoto[3900]",'popup','width=91,height=91,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/skype-logo-4-tm.jpg" height="100" width="100" border="0" align="left" hspace="10" vspace="10" alt="Skype" title="Skype" /></a><br />
You&#8217;d think judging by this <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/sep2008/tc20080911_970676.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index+-+temp_technology">BusinessWeek</a> article that Skype is a strategic albatross hanging around eBay&#8217;s neck.</p>
<p>Yes, Ebay overpaid for Skype. And it hasn&#8217;t panned out strategically if the goal was giving eBay sellers a new communications tool.</p>
<p>But Skype has seen tremendous growth with 335 million registered users and projected revenue this year of $500-million. Given Skype doesn&#8217;t market aggressive, its profit margins are probably pretty sweet.</p>
<p>The question facing eBay is what, if anything, does it do with Skype.</p>
<p>The first question is whether eBay needs to do anything at all. With eBay&#8217;s business struggling for growth, Skype gives it a high-growth business along with Paypal. So why sell Skype other than to heed the calls of investors who may not see it as a strategic fit?</p>
<p>The other part of the eBay-Skype is whether Skype can reach its full potential within the eBay empire. Can Skype innovate, market and generate more revenue from premium services as an eBay division as opposed to a standalone entity (e.g. an IPO) or as part of a telecom company (e.g. Verizon or AT&#38;T)?</p>
<p>The reality is there should be no pressure for eBay to do anything with Skype until it gets the right opportunity. The key is giving Skype enough strategic latitude to thrive so that if eBay does want to unload it, the business could be more valuable.</p>
<p>Of course, it would be good if Skype had some management stability. But that says as much about eBay&#8217;s handling of Skype as anything else, which is probably why people are poking around at Skype&#8217;s future within eBay.</p>
<p><strong>More:</strong> Om Malik did a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPf2jaBcc_0">one-on-one interview</a> recently with Skype CEO Josh Silverman. When asked about Skype being on mobile devices, Silverman says &#8220;We hear you brother, We&#8217;re working on it&#8221;. When asked about Skype on the iPhone, Silverman shifts around in his seat and says &#8220;Stayed tuned&#8221;. Interesting.</p>
<p><!-- technorati tags start -->
<p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/ebay" rel="tag">ebay</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/iPhone" rel="tag">iPhone</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/skype" rel="tag">skype</a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags end --></p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/13/to-skype-or-not-to-skype/' addthis:title='To Skype or Not to Skype? ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/13/to-skype-or-not-to-skype/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts on VoIP</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/08/13/thoughts-on-voip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/08/13/thoughts-on-voip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[VOIP Services, Competition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wrote an article for a new Web site called VoIP Services looking at some of the challenges facing VoIP service providers. As some of you may recall, this blog&#8217;s original focus was VoIP (back when Vonage was all the rage!) so it&#8217;s like old times. Technorati Tags: Vonage<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/08/13/thoughts-on-voip/' addthis:title='Thoughts on VoIP ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote an article for a new Web site called <a href="http://www.voip-phone-and-voip-providers.com/">VoIP Services</a> looking at some of the <a href="http://www.voip-phone-and-voip-providers.com/voip-issues.html">challenges facing VoIP service providers</a>. As some of you may recall, this blog&#8217;s original focus was VoIP (back when Vonage was all the rage!) so it&#8217;s like old times.<br />
 <img src='http://www.markevanstech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><!-- technorati tags start -->
<p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Vonage" rel="tag">Vonage</a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags end --></p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/08/13/thoughts-on-voip/' addthis:title='Thoughts on VoIP ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/08/13/thoughts-on-voip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skype: The Rodney Dangerfield of Telecom</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/04/02/skype-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-telecom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/04/02/skype-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-telecom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[M&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOIP Services, Competition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/04/02/skype-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-telecom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The worst thing that ever happened to Skype was eBay&#8217;s decision to acquire it for $3.1-billion. In an instant, Skype went from being cool and disruptive to a wildly over-priced acquisition that made little strategic sense for eBay. While eBay has struggled to figured out how Skype fits into the scheme of things (and taken [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/04/02/skype-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-telecom/' addthis:title='Skype: The Rodney Dangerfield of Telecom ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/rodney.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/rodney.jpg' rel="prettyPhoto[3281]",'popup','width=125,height=128,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/rodney-tm.jpg" height="100" width="97" border="0" align="left" hspace="10" vspace="10" alt="Rodney" /></a><br />
The worst thing that ever happened to Skype was eBay&#8217;s decision to acquire it for $3.1-billion.</p>
<p>In an instant, Skype went from being cool and disruptive to a wildly over-priced acquisition that made little strategic sense for eBay. While eBay has struggled to figured out how Skype fits into the scheme of things (and taken a <strong>$1.4-billion writedown</strong> on the deal), Skype has evolved into a solid, growing business with revenue last year of $375-million, 276 million registered users, and 100 billion minutes of calls generated over the past five years.</p>
<p>Yet Skype receives little or no respect for being one of the few bright lights within the telecom industry, which makes it the resident <a href="http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Rodney_Dangerfield">Rodney Dangerfield</a>, whose catch line was &#8220;I don&#8217;t get no respect&#8221;. You rarely see stories about Skype&#8217;s growth or how well it&#8217;s managed to do despite becoming an orphan within the eBay empire. Instead, the focus is always on how eBay paid too much, the writedown and how Skype makes no strategic sense for eBay.</p>
<p>The question facing eBay and its new president, John Donahue, is what to do with eBay (and <a href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/01/25/what-now-for-skype-stumbleupon/">StumbleUpon</a> and <a href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/27/what-does-ebay-do-with-craigslist-stake/">Craigslist</a>, for that matter). Do you sell Skype, and wash your hands of an acquisition that made little sense. Do you keep it, and try to grow the crap out of it?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/01/googleskype-acquisition-or-partnership-imminent/">TechCrunch</a>, which loves nothing better than a juicy M&#38;A rumour, is reporting Google could be in talks to buy or partner with Skype. It&#8217;s hard to tell whether there&#8217;s anything to the speculation given it seems to be based on the where there is smoke, there is fire approach.</p>
<p>The biggest issue for eBay is doing something with Skype that doesn&#8217;t make them look like strategic idiots again. If Donahue going to get off to a solid start as president, he needs to do something with Skype that looks smart, savvy and pragmatic.</p>
<p>Given Google&#8217;s interest in telecom (GrandCentral, GTalk, wireless spectrum etc.), Skype could make sense at the right price. Of course, it made sense for Google a few years ago when Tim Draper, one of Skype&#8217;s early investors, was running around Silicon Valley boldly suggesting Skype was worth $1-billion.</p>
<p><strong>More:</strong> <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/4/ebay_selling_skype_to_google_let_us_pray">Silicon Valley Insider</a> suggests Skype could be acquired for <strong>$3.1-billion to $4-billion</strong>, which would let eBay walk away with its head held high.</p>
<p><!-- technorati tags start -->
<p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/eBay" rel="tag">eBay</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Google " rel="tag">Google </a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Rodney Dangerfield" rel="tag">Rodney Dangerfield</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Skype" rel="tag">Skype</a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags end --></p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/04/02/skype-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-telecom/' addthis:title='Skype: The Rodney Dangerfield of Telecom ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/04/02/skype-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-telecom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skype Should Do An IPO Soon</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/10/02/skype-should-do-an-ipo-soon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/10/02/skype-should-do-an-ipo-soon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[VOIP Services, Competition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/2007/10/02/skype-should-do-an-ipo-soon/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, eBay blew it with the purchase of Skype by wildly over-paying. So what now? After cleaning up its books, eBay should set Skype free by doing an IPO. It would probably be embarrassing to eBay but how much worse can it get? If you step back, Skype appears to be a pretty solid business [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/10/02/skype-should-do-an-ipo-soon/' addthis:title='Skype Should Do An IPO Soon ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/skype-logo-1.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/skype-logo-1.jpg' rel="prettyPhoto[2712]",'popup','width=91,height=91,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/skype-logo-1-tm.jpg" height="100" width="100" border="0" align="left" hspace="10" vspace="10" alt="Skype Logo-1" /></a><br />
Okay, eBay blew it with the purchase of Skype by <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/01/ebays-4-billion-lesson-in-the-value-of-hype/">wildly over-paying</a>. So what now?</p>
<p>After cleaning up its books, eBay should set Skype free by <strong>doing an IPO</strong>. It would probably be embarrassing to eBay but how much worse can it get?</p>
<p>If you step back, Skype appears to be a pretty solid business with about $400-million in revenue and 220 million registered users. How much is that worth? Let&#8217;s conservatively assume $2-billion based on eBay&#8217;s writedown and reduced earn-out ($530-million vs. $1.7-billion).</p>
<p>If Skype did an IPO, my sense is <strong>investors would be all over it</strong>.</p>
<p>1. Retail investors are crazy about high-profile brand names who sell services they can understand/use.</p>
<p>2. The VoIP market is growing, and will get bigger as high-speed Internet, Wi-Fi and Wi-Max become more popular.</p>
<p>3. Skype is <strong>a real business</strong> with sales and probably pretty high-margins that has not been monetized properly. eBay could have aggressively rolled out more premium services and even introduced advertising into the mix. If everyone excited about Facebook and its 35 million users, there should be buzz about Skype and its 220-million registered users.</p>
<p>4. There would be a long line-up of investment banks more than willing to enthusiastically sell Skype.</p>
<p><strong>Prediction: </strong>An IPO would be a financial bonanza The offering price would be left far behind and the blogosphere would be full of Skype is amazing posts. Hey, we&#8217;re not talking Vonage,which has a business model that doesn&#8217;t work; we&#8217;re talking about Skype, baby! The only caveat is eBay may not be willing to let Skype go public because the offering&#8217;s success would be embarassing.</p>
<p><strong>More: </strong><a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20071002/pop-quiz-if-skypehype-then-facebook/">Kara Swisher</a> makes some excellent points about how eBay failed to leverage Skype&#8217;s exploding popularity. Swisher also uses the eBay-Skype investment fiasco to take yet another run at Facebook and all the hype surrounding potential investors. </p>
<p>Swisher may be one of the few people happy to rain on Facebook&#8217;s parade these days but I can&#8217;t help but get the gnawing feeling that she&#8217;s on to something. For whatever reason, Facebook has lost its mojo &#8211; at least that&#8217;s my sense. Maybe it&#8217;s the outrageous potential valuation; maybe it&#8217;s Facebook starting to monetize itself; or maybe it&#8217;s Facebook Fatigue (FF)&#8230;but I&#8217;ve lost that lovin&#8217; feeling and not feeling too sad about it.</p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/10/02/skype-should-do-an-ipo-soon/' addthis:title='Skype Should Do An IPO Soon ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/10/02/skype-should-do-an-ipo-soon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>eBay-Skype: I Hate to Say I Told You So&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/10/01/ebay-skype-i-hate-to-say-i-told-you-so/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/10/01/ebay-skype-i-hate-to-say-i-told-you-so/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 23:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[VOIP Services, Competition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/2007/10/01/ebay-skype-i-hate-to-say-i-told-you-so/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was one of those people who never got eBay&#8217;s decision to buy Skype. It didn&#8217;t make sense strategically despite eBay&#8217;s loud assertions it was a great fit. In fact, I opined &#8211; along with lots of other people such as Andy Abramson &#8211; that eBay got suckered. Over the past two years, the eBay-Skype [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/10/01/ebay-skype-i-hate-to-say-i-told-you-so/' addthis:title='eBay-Skype: I Hate to Say I Told You So&#8230;. ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/suckers.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/suckers.jpg' rel="prettyPhoto[2709]",'popup','width=120,height=120,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/suckers-tm.jpg" height="100" width="100" border="0" align="left" hspace="10" vspace="10" alt="Suckers" /></a><br />
I was one of those people who never got eBay&#8217;s decision to buy Skype. It didn&#8217;t make sense strategically despite eBay&#8217;s loud assertions it was a great fit. In fact, I opined &#8211; along with lots of other people such as Andy Abramson &#8211; that <a href="http://markevanstech.com/2005/12/05/ebay-got-suckered-on-skype/">eBay got suckered</a>.</p>
<p>Over the past two years, the eBay-Skype marriage never seemed to click. There were constant management changes and strategic inconsistencies while eBay struggled with its own growth issues such as problems trying to establish a foothold in China.</p>
<p>Finally, eBay has conceded defeat by taking a $1.4-billion write-off, saying goodbye to CEO Niklas Zennstrom, and, most significant, only paying out <strong>$530-million of a potential $1.7-billion</strong> earn-out. As Henry Blodget proclaims <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/10/its-finally-off.html">&#8220;Skype has Bombed&#8221;</a>.</p>
<p>Looking back, the question that has to be asked by investors and eBay board is: what was senior management thinking? How could they have made such an expensive strategic mistake? Did CEO Meg Whitman <strong>get suckered by Google</strong>, which was also apparently interested in buying Skype? Probably.</p>
<p>If you ask me, the eBay-Skype deal was/is part of the weird Silcon Valley ecosystem where everyone&#8217;s buying and selling from each other. If you remember, Tim Draper, a leading Silicon Valley VC, was at a Silicon Valley conference around talking about how Skype was worth at least $1-billion. The next thing you know, eBay&#8217;s got the checkbook out with an offer that blows everyone away.</p>
<p>So now what? Unless eBay really wants to take a bath, it&#8217;s stuck with Skype. One option might be spinning off Skype into a quasi-autonomous business that it could <strong>IPO within a couple of years</strong>.</p>
<p>If you want to read some serious spin, check out Skype co-founder <a href="http://www.janusfriis.net/2007/10/01/not-just-another-monday/">Janus Friis&#8217; post</a> on what&#8217;s happening. It&#8217;s funny and sad at the same time.</p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/10/01/ebay-skype-i-hate-to-say-i-told-you-so/' addthis:title='eBay-Skype: I Hate to Say I Told You So&#8230;. ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/10/01/ebay-skype-i-hate-to-say-i-told-you-so/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Urban Myth: The Workaround</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/04/16/tech-urban-myth-the-workaround/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/04/16/tech-urban-myth-the-workaround/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOIP Services, Competition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/2007/04/16/tech-urban-myth-the-workaround/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there such a thing as a &#8220;workaround&#8221; that actually, well, works? It strikes me that whenever a company gets in trouble for infringing on someone else&#8217;s IP, the company doing the infringing says &#8220;No worries, we&#8217;ve got a workaround somewhere around here that we had put aside for a rainy day&#8221;. Vonage, for example, [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/04/16/tech-urban-myth-the-workaround/' addthis:title='Tech Urban Myth: The Workaround ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/vonage-1.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/vonage-1.jpg' rel="prettyPhoto[2264]",'popup','width=195,height=45,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/vonage-1-tm.jpg" height="50" width="216" border="0" align="left" hspace="10" vspace="10" alt="Vonage-1" /></a><br />
Is there such a thing as a &#8220;workaround&#8221; that actually, well, works? It strikes me that whenever a company gets in trouble for infringing on someone else&#8217;s IP, the company doing the infringing says &#8220;No worries, we&#8217;ve got a workaround somewhere around here that we had put aside for a rainy day&#8221;. Vonage, for example, claimed it had a workaround after a U.S. judge ruled it had infringed on technology owned by Verizon, while Research in Motion talked about a workaround during the latter stage of its legal woes with NPT Inc.</p>
<p>We never found out whether or not RIM did have a workaround because it ended up forking over more than six hundred extra-large ones (aka millions) to make NTP go away. Now, Vonage has admitted <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/telecom/2007-04-15-vonage-usat_N.htm">it doesn&#8217;t have a workaround</a> after suggesting last week it had a workaround in development . Even worse, Vonage isn&#8217;t sure that a workaround is &#8220;feasible&#8221; given the extent of Verizon&#8217;s patents. This is bad news because it means Vonage will likely be unable to sign up new customers unless it reaches a patent deal with Verizon. Maybe Vonage&#8217;s new CEO, Jeff Citron (who used to be the old CEO), will be able to strike a deal with Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg.</p>
<p>For more, check out <a href="http://thomashowe.blogspot.com/2007/04/vonage-is-stuck.html">Thomas Howe</a>, who is incredulous Vonage can&#8217;t create a workaround, as well as <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/16/vonage-no-workaround-were-pretty-much-screwed/">Engadget</a>.</p>
<p><!-- technorati tags start -->
<p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Vonage" rel="tag">Vonage</a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags end --></p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/04/16/tech-urban-myth-the-workaround/' addthis:title='Tech Urban Myth: The Workaround ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/04/16/tech-urban-myth-the-workaround/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vonage: From Bad to Worse</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/04/12/vonage-from-bad-to-worse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/04/12/vonage-from-bad-to-worse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOIP Services, Competition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/2007/04/12/vonage-from-bad-to-worse/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If losing a crucial legal decision to Verizon recently isn&#8217;t bad enough, Vonage now has find itself a new CEO after Michael Snyder resigned. As important, the company said it plans to slash operating costs by $140-million to &#8220;enhance shareholder value and improve its competitiveness in the marketplace&#8221;. This is particularly bad news for Web [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/04/12/vonage-from-bad-to-worse/' addthis:title='Vonage: From Bad to Worse ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/oldphone.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/oldphone.jpg' rel="prettyPhoto[2257]",'popup','width=93,height=125,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/oldphone-tm.jpg" height="100" width="74" border="0" align="left" hspace="10" vspace="10" alt="Oldphone" /></a><br />
If losing a <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=anDrCRkj4nn0&amp;refer=home">crucial legal decision</a> to Verizon recently isn&#8217;t bad enough, Vonage now has find itself a new CEO after <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/070412/nyth038.html">Michael Snyder resigned</a>. As important, the company said it plans to slash operating costs by <strong>$140-million</strong> to &#8220;enhance shareholder value and improve its competitiveness in the marketplace&#8221;. This is particularly bad news for Web sites that have reaped the benefits of Vonage&#8217;s aggressive marketing efforts given the company has been spending nearly <strong>$200-million online</strong> <strong>a year</strong>. </p>
<p>Since Snyder joined Vonage in March 2006, <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=VG">Vonage&#8217;s shares</a> have tumbled from about $14 to $3.09. The company has been battered by an ocean of red ink, increasing competition from cablecos getting into the VOIP business, inconsistent service, and a high churn rate that has forced Vonage to <strong>spend like a drunken sailor</strong> on marketing to attract new customers. From the very start, Vonage&#8217;s prospects as a business have been unclear given its growth strategy was tied to attracting as many customers as fast as it could by offering a low-cost product in a market with little barriers to entry. </p>
<p>To me, Vonage was always more of an investment play by co-founder (and now interim CEO) Jeffrey Citron, who figured someone would snap it up to establish a foothold in the VOIP market. As it turned out, no one was willing to step up to the plate. This forced Vonage to make a $17-a-share IPO, which amazingly was over-subscribed. You could make a solid argument that <strong>Vonage single-handedly killed the tech IPO market</strong>, which isn&#8217;t such a bad thing given it has forced many companies to focus on growing their businesses, while keeping overly-enthusiastic investors from throwing themselves into risky investment vehicles.</p>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> Check out this <a href="http://www.clickz.com/showPage.html?page=3625523">ClickZ story</a> on how Vonage&#8217;s trouble could impact the online ad industry. As well, <a href="http://blogs.pulver.com/jarnold/archives/2007/04/vonage_speaks.html">Jon Arnold</a> has an extensive post on Vonage&#8217;s conference call this morning.</p>
<p><!-- technorati tags start -->
<p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Vonage" rel="tag">Vonage</a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags end --></p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/04/12/vonage-from-bad-to-worse/' addthis:title='Vonage: From Bad to Worse ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/04/12/vonage-from-bad-to-worse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Low Can Vonage Go?</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/03/26/how-low-can-vonage-go/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/03/26/how-low-can-vonage-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOIP Services, Competition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/2007/03/26/how-low-can-vonage-go/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After being hit with an injunction last week that prevents it from using VoIP technology owned by Verizon, Vonage shares plunged a record low of $2.98 on Friday before bouncing back to $3.37 today. Since its 17-a-share IPO, Vonage has dropped a staggering 80%. The obvious question is when does Vonage start to represent good [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/03/26/how-low-can-vonage-go/' addthis:title='How Low Can Vonage Go? ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After being hit with <a href="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=21780&amp;hed=Judge+Hits+Vonage+with+Injunction">an injunction</a> last week that prevents it from using VoIP technology owned by Verizon, <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=VG">Vonage shares</a> plunged a record low of $2.98 on Friday before bouncing back to $3.37 today. Since its 17-a-share IPO, Vonage has dropped a staggering 80%. The obvious question is when does Vonage start to represent good value to investors and/or good acquisition material for someone looking to instantly add 2.2-million subscribers.</p>
<p>For investors, the question of value comes down to assessing whether Vonage can maintain its subscriber momentum amid increasingly fierce competition; whether it can keep more of its existing customers, which would allow it to dial back the dollars spent on marketing; and whether it can shrink its losses. </p>
<p>In many ways, Vonage is running in a marathon, and it can&#8217;t afford to stop spending if it wants to build a big enough subscriber base to establish a solid foothold. If Vonage decides to spent less on marketing, the cablecos will start to eat its lunch &#8211; which explains why Vonage is all over the NCAA basketball tournament, for example. At the very least, Vonage needs to keep pushing forward even if it runs into pesky hurdles such as injunctions, a stock heading south, large losses and a troubling churn rate.</p>
<p>In terms of the injunction,<a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/070326/clm173.html"> Vonage said</a> the market is over-reacting (really, does anyone expect them to say otherwise?). In breaking the rule never to paraphrase Mark Twain in a press release, Vonage CEO Mike Snyder paraphrased Mark Twain by saying &#8220;the rumors of Vonage&#8217;s death have been greatly exaggerated. Friday&#8217;s events represented one small step in what is sure to be a long legal battle.&#8221;</p>
<p><!-- technorati tags start -->
<p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Vonage" rel="tag">Vonage</a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags end --></p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/03/26/how-low-can-vonage-go/' addthis:title='How Low Can Vonage Go? ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/03/26/how-low-can-vonage-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vonage: Bullish or Bearish?</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/02/16/vonage-bullish-or-bearish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/02/16/vonage-bullish-or-bearish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOIP Services, Competition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/2007/02/16/vonage-bullish-or-bearish/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, the good news from Vonage&#8217;s fourth-quarter results: the VoIP service provider now has 2.22 million subscribers after it add another 166,000 customers in the quarter. Meanwhile, it only lost $65-million as revenue nearly doubled from a year earlier. Now, the bad news: the stock tumbled to a record low, $5.25, amid concerns subscriber growth [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/02/16/vonage-bullish-or-bearish/' addthis:title='Vonage: Bullish or Bearish? ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/Vonage.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/Vonage.jpg' rel="prettyPhoto[2106]",'popup','width=195,height=45,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://markevanstech.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/Vonage-tm.jpg" height="50" width="216" border="0" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" alt="Vonage" /></a><br />
First, the good news from <a href="http://pr.vonage.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=230057">Vonage&#8217;s fourth-quarter results</a>: the VoIP service provider now has 2.22 million subscribers after it add another 166,000 customers in the quarter. Meanwhile, it only lost $65-million as revenue nearly doubled from a year earlier.</p>
<p>Now, the bad news: the stock tumbled to a record low, $5.25, amid concerns subscriber growth slowing. Vonage said it expects to have between 2.9-million to 3.1 million customers by the end of this year, compared with analyst expectations about about 3.5 million. The company also expects to lose $150-million to $170-million this year before becoming profitable in early-2008.</p>
<p>So what do you focus on: the good news or bad news? The narrower loss in the quarter or the concerns about subscriber growth? There&#8217;s no doubt the competitive landscape is getting more intense as the cablecos and, increasingly, the carriers become more aggressive. Then, you&#8217;ve got players such as SunRocket and 8&#215;8. That said, Vonage has 2.2 million customers so it can&#8217;t be dismissed. The question is whether Vonage can continue to see strong enough growth to become profitable, establish a solid competitive foothold, and get investors excited again about a stock that has tumbled from its IPO price of $17.</p>
<p>For more, check out <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/vonage-narrows-4q-loss-to-65-million/n20070215185709990004">AOL Money &#38; Finance</a>; <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/vonage-narrows-4q-loss-to-65-million/n20070215185709990004">Russell Shaw</a>, who is troubled by the subscriber slowdown, including soft sales during the holidays, and <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=4507">Larry Dignan</a>, who wonders if Vonage has a future, and looks at a possible takeover (current price: $836-million) given the company&#8217;s depressed stock price.</p>
<p><!-- technorati tags start -->
<p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Vonage" rel="tag">Vonage</a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags end --></p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/02/16/vonage-bullish-or-bearish/' addthis:title='Vonage: Bullish or Bearish? ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/02/16/vonage-bullish-or-bearish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

