| Subscribe via RSS

Video Comments: Huh?

May 14th, 2008 | 10 Comments | Posted in Blogs, Video

Like Fred Wilson, I don’t get video comments on blogs.

To me, it’s a technology (video) looking to solve a problem that doesn’t exist. It’s just not clear how video comments are better and/or different from text comments, or how they enhance/change a conversation.

Still, there’s no lack of companies looking to force video comments on to the market. The latest is Disqus and Seesmic, which are teaming up to offer video comments. I really like what Disqus is doing but my advice is they should focus on making their text comment system better and more feature-rich (e.g. trackbacks would be nice, as well as a way to backup comments) rather than running into the video market.

Speaking of Seesmic, I don’t get it either. Lots of hype led by a savvy CEO, Loic Le meur.

Update: In contrast to me bearishness about video comments, She Geeks is enthusiastic about the idea, especially how user-friendliness of the Disqus-Seesmic service. Mathew Ingram, meanwhile, is cautiously optimistic.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Related Posts

What’s With All the Puppets?

April 9th, 2008 | 5 Comments | Posted in Video

Sock Puppet
Back in the height of the dot-com boom, the Pets.com socket puppet dog was extremely popular while Pets.com, the business, floundered despite raising gobs of venture capital. The puppet appeared on ABC’s Good Morning America, Nightline, Live with Regis and Kathie Lee, and had a balloon for the 1999 Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade.

Although the rights to the puppet were sold after Pets.com went out of business, the use of puppets within the online world pretty much disappeared…until now.

It seems puppets are back, they’re hot and resonating with a multi-tasking, time-strapped audience. For example, 1938Media’s Loren Feldman has scored a huge hit with a funny, but sometimes cruel, puppet series featuring Shel Israel (the puppet, not the social media consultant) doing a series of interviews. The series has become so popular that it even has a new sponsor - Zong, mobile platform company - and Feldman may not be able to get himself back in front of the camera any time soon.

Next on the puppet stage is Flickr, which has just released a new video service, which oddly is limited to 90-seconds and uploading just for Flickr Pro customers (see TechCrunch’s mini-review). To illustrate the new service, the Flickr blog users two puppets, which, by the way, are no way as cut as the sock puppet dog or Shel Israel, the puppet, not the social media consultant.

Puppets are cute and all but we’re adults; we’re not supposed to be watching puppet shows because puppet shows are for children. If real people aren’t good enough to make a point or launch a new service, why not embrace Common Craft’s Paperworks concept, which are smarter and, well, a lot more mature.

More: There’s no lack of comment/coverage about Flickr Video but Silicon Valley Insider has an interesting post looking at whether Flickr’s decision to limit video uploading to its $25/year Pro customers could actually be a business model for video.

Update: Speaking of puppets, Shel Israel (The Puppet, not the social media consultants) interview with Seesmic’s Loic Lemur is pretty good and funny. The puppet asks pretty good questions.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Related Posts

A Simple Path to Success

March 23rd, 2008 | 5 Comments | Posted in Video

Picture 1-62
(Update: The New York Times has a story (April 12) looking at older consumers want simple products as opposed to things with lots of bells and whistles.)

David Pogue’s column this week in the NYT is about the surprising success of the Flip, a no-frills video recorder that has captured 13% of the camcorder market in the past year.

For all you gadget geeks out there, the Flip is nothing to write home about. It has few bells and whistles and none of the you-really-need-to-read-the-manual frills that many geeks demand in new products. As Pogue notes: “…on paper, the Flip looks like a cheesy toy that no self-respecting geek would fool with, let alone a technology columnist.”

Then again, the Flip is also dead easy to use - so simple that my daughter was happily recording videos within minutes of receiving it as a present for Christmas.

What’s interesting about Pogue’s review and the Flip’s strong sales is how a simple product can be so successful. At a time where too many products are over-engineered and many consumers barely scratch the surface of the available features, the Flip demonstrates how simplicity - rather than complexity - can rule the day.

Unfortunately, there’s not enough simplicity when it comes to technology. This probably has a lot to do with the fact that more features is a major tool that product makers deploy when trying to convince consumers they need to upgrade or buy the “new and improved” model. For example, why live with your antiquated 7.2 megapixel digital camera when the new 10 megapixel model will do an even better job.

While there may, in fact, be lots of good reasons for complexity, there’s also a need for simple, intuitive and user-friendly technology. In fact, as life gets busier with more choices than ever before, simplicity could rule the day.

This may explain why the Flip has done so well. To make a video using a Flip, all you do is turn it one, hit the record button and then hit stop. To watch it, you press the play button. For most consumers, this basic feature set will meet all of their needs.

Here are a few other examples of how simplicity has resonated so well with consumers:

- Twitter: You can only type 140-character messages, and there are few bells and whistles despite calls (including mine) for more features. Twitter is a simple, clean and effective communications tool. It is somewhat ironic that it’s lack of complexity has been a key reasons why geeks have embraced it so enthusiastically.

- Blackberry: While Research in Motion has added more features (a better telephone, an MP3 player and an improved, yet still inadequate, browser) as it drives harder into the pro-sumer market, the Blackberry rocks because it does one thing extremely well - mobile e-mail. It’s why millions of people are buying Blackberrys in a market where there’s no lack of choice.

- Google: Its search engine dominates because it’s easy to use with a clean, lean interface. And, like the Blackberry, it works really well, which is why once someone uses Google, there is little chance they will try another search engine.

I’m sure there are plenty of other examples of simple products and services that are thriving because they work well despite have a minimum number of features. Anyone have any ideas/nominations.

Update: Robert Scoble suggests the secret to Twitter is how many people you follow, while Michael Arrington suggests the best third-party Twitter service is Quotably.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Related Posts

Garry Marr: Video Star

February 5th, 2008 | 7 Comments | Posted in Video

Hey look, the National Post has turned my friend, Garry Marr, into a video star.

They’ve just launched a new series called Marred by Taxes that features Marr talking about taxes. The first video (below) has him talking about the many hidden car rental taxes. What makes the video work so well is it reflects Garry’s true personality. He’s not acting; this is the real Garry, and he delivers like he’s been doing videos for years. I think he may have found his calling.

Technorati Tags:

Related Posts

Me and Craigslist’s Jim Buckmaster

June 8th, 2007 | No Comments | Posted in Video

Thanks to the folks at mDialogue, a video of my mesh keynote with Craigslist CEO Jim Buckmaster is now available. In watching it, it’s hard not to be impressed by Buckmaster’s stage presence. He’s comfortable, insight and funny - something the SRO audience ate up.

Related Posts

Everyone’s Doing Video

June 7th, 2007 | No Comments | Posted in Video

I was walking along Queen St. in downtown Toronto yesterday afternoon and came across a film crew doing “streeters” for TV or the Web, which usually involve a pretty young girl asking people passing by what they think about something fairly simple (e.g. Are people in Toronto still polite? How do you deal with summer heat?). It used to be that seeing a film crew was a big deal because there weren’t that many around. Like moths to light (or Cinderella to the spindle), you would find yourself mysteriously attracted to the “spectacle” even if was just some guy with good hair talking about weather. After all, this was TV happening right in front of you.

Today, everyone’s doing TV or online video. With the barriers to entry lower than ever (lower-cost cameras; inexpensive, easy to use editing software, and cheap bandwidth), it’s easier than ever to “do TV”. Suddenly, the guy who interested in doing TV can do it and, if they’re lucky like Ze Frank or Andrew Barron, become quasi-famous. Last week at the mesh conference, i watched 1938media’s Loren Feldman walk around shooting video using a really small Casio camera with a 2GB memory card. In no time at all, he was putting 60 second to three-minute interview clips on the Web.

What I did learn was Loren was although making TV is easier and cheaper than ever, it’s still a challenge to be able to do something in front of the camera that’s worth watching. What Feldman and Ze Frank have is “presence”, although their styles couldn’t be more different. Feldman, an ex-actor, is clearly comfortable in front of the camera and has a unique and engaging view of the world. It works. That’s why he can attract an audience.. The way I see it, the biggest challenge facing the video revolution is not the making of video but how consumers find the good stuff amid a sea of choice.

Technorati Tags:

Related Posts

How Fast Do We Need to Go?

June 5th, 2007 | 2 Comments | Posted in ILEC News, Analysis, Video, Web-based Services

Speed
A new study by eMarketer looking at the number of global broadband subscribers expected to happen by 2011 (567 million) got me thinking about how much bandwidth is enough to meet the needs of most consumers. Right now, 5Mbps seems to be the standard, although some South Korean ISPs are offering as much as 100Mbps.

Obviously, the need for an ultra big pipe is driven by demand for music, video games and video, particularly high-definition video. But it is becoming clear that the bigger the pipe, the higher the price for consumers. This reality has been seized as a marketing opportunity by the carriers and cablecos, which are slicing and dicing high-speed services into a variety of packages based on what consumers think they need. The flip side is ISPs have also been able to raise prices by emphasizing speed - something that resonates with consumers even if they don’t really need it.

What seems to be lost amid the focus on speed is whether high-speed networks can actually deliver at a time when video is eating up an increasing amount of bandwidth. This strikes me as a strange discussion when you realize it wasn’t that long ago that people were talking about a bandwidth glut and the existence of too much dark fiber. The amount of noise on the network has sparked a discussion about whether a new Internet needs to be created to complement the Web. This New Internet - which sounds like Canada’s CaNet4 and Internet2 in the U.S.- would see a network devoted to R&D activity, universities and other special projects.

In terms of the eMarketer study, the research firm expects the number of broadband subscribers will reach 567 million over the next four years from 285 million now. This will include 55 million fiber-to-the-home subscribers. eMarketer analyst Ben Macklin said a growing trend is broadband trade-up where consumers are migrating to “very high-speed connections. Plain old vanilla ADSL is quickly turning into the new ‘dial-up;”.

Update: According to a new report, N53% of US households now subscribe to a high-speed Internet service, and that high-speed now accounts for about 72% of all home subscriptions – compared to 60% last year.

Broadband Growth

Related Posts

It’s Good to be Niklas Zennstrom

May 10th, 2007 | 1 Comment | Posted in Venture Capital, Video

Must be good to be Nikas Zennstrom these days. You sell Skype to eBay for a lofty $3.1-billion, and then decide to launch another start-up, Joost, to disrupt the television/video industry. It turns out investors like your track record and the Joost story so they agree to pony up $45-million in venture capital. I guess there’s nothing like a successful track record to give investors (Sequoia Capital, Index Ventures, CBS Corporation, Viacom and Chinese billionaire Li Ka-shing) a sense of confidence about a new venture. That said, it seems like an awful lot of money for a business that has its fair share of hiccups in recent months amid a flurry of buzz and hyperbole. And it’s not like Joost has no competition.

Related Posts

Don’t Get Suckered by Motorola “Study”

May 3rd, 2007 | 7 Comments | Posted in Video

There’s lots of buzz within the blogosphere today about an “independent” study by Motorola that 45% of European now watch TV online. First, there’s no such thing as a truly independent study from a company that happens to supply equipment to watch TV online. Second, the “study” isn’t focused on the European population but 2,500 broadband users in the U.K., France, Germany, Italy and Spain. I guess Europeans and/or broadband users in Belgium, Scandanavia, Holland and Eastern Europe don’t count.

If you’re already suspicious or skeptical, the study breathlessly proclaims the “TV itself appears to be evolving from a static ‘box in the corner of the living room’ into an interactive entertainment and communications tool.” Well, wonders never cease, do they!?

And then there’s a “quote” from Karl Elliott, a Motorola executive (note: why is a Motorola executive quoted in an independent study?), who announces that “These results show that viewers across Europe are no longer satisfied with fitting into schedules dictated by broadcasters and are turning to the choice and flexibility offered by TV over the internet. We are witnessing a nation of citizen schedulers who are in control of their entertainment, allowing them to watch what they want, how and when they want it.”

Related Posts

The Unclear Prospects of IP-TV

April 1st, 2007 | 1 Comment | Posted in Main Page, Video

Not sure what to make of BCE’s decision to put the brakes on a plan to spend C$1.2-billion to upgrade its residential high-speed network in Ontario and Quebec. According to the Globe & Mail, BCE has only spent $400-million so far because it wants to allocate capital where it “best serves the interest of the business”. For BCE, this means spending money on upgrading its wireless network, improving customer service, and growing its retail presence.

But what does this decision mean for BCE’s IP-TV plans? The $1.2-billion project was supposed to give BCE a big enough pipe into 4.3 million homes so it could deliver IP-TV services to compete against the cablecos, which are aggressively moving into the $10-billion local phone business. Does BCE’s decision to spend money on other projects mean those projects have better ROI prospects? And/or does it suggest BCE is unsure if it can get enough bang for the buck by pouring money into IP-TV? Or Maybe BCE thinks it can get just as much strategic play from its satellite-TV business rather than pouring money into a new TV business.

For all the bullishness out there about IP-TV (53 million worldwide subscribers by 2009, according to Infonetics), the biggest issue/question is why many consumers would switch from cable other than lower prices or triple/quadruple play bundles. It’s not like IP-TV can offer consumers something so different and better than they feel compelled to cancel their cable service. Then again, many carriers have little choice but to press ahead with IP-TV if they want to play in the bundle war against the cablecos. This is an expensive proposition with, at best, uncertain prospects.

Note: BCE’s original plan was to complete the $1.2-billion project by 2008. Now, it’s talking about 2011.

Related Posts




  • Wikio - Top Blogs - Technology