Learn how we work with startups and entrepreneurs to deliver marketing strategies and tactical execution

inbox

What’s More Important to Startups: Design or Utility?

Over the past few weeks, there has been an interesting debate raging about design versus utility for startups looking to capture the spotlight.

The key issues are whether the look and feel of a service is more important than how it actually works. If a service looks crappy, does it impact its appeal, or can a service be compelling even with bad design?

The issue was thrust into the spotlight when entrepreneur and developer Jon Yongfook Cockle published a post that “design is horseshit”. At the core of his thesis is the belief “design enhances value, it does not create it”, and startups that create a sparkly products that don’t solve a problem aren’t creating value.

It was not surprising to Cockle’s post struck a chord given how enamoured we’ve become with design – a trend stoked by our good friends at Apple. It explains why there are posts such as “Silicon Valley’s New Secret Weapon: Designers Who Found Startups” and “Did you know about billions worth of value created by tech startups with designer co-founders?”

To me, there has to be equilibrium between design and utility because one can’t thrive without the other. For startups, it’s a tough balancing act because consumers are fickle and time-strapped so first impressions (aka design) are important. At the same time, consumers are also quick recognize if a well-designed Web site offers little value (aka putting lipstick on a pig).

Yes, I’m fence-sitting but design and utility are important to startups. But if I were to choose I’d go with utility over design. Why? There’s so much competition that startup need to do solve a problem, make something easier, or delight. Otherwise, people will simply move on to the next service.

If forced to choose, I would politely suggest a valuable service with  a modicum of design has a better chance of resonating than a beautiful service that is little more than eye-candy.

Of course, the best startups not only offer something of value and good design but strong messaging, creative branding and a flair for positioning themselves with target audiences.

What do you think? What’s more important? Design or utility?

For more on design vs. utility, check out this blog post on .Net.

Subscribe to "This Week in Canadian Startups"
A weekly newsletter delivered to your inbox!

This entry was posted in Social Media, Startups and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://dashthis.com Stephane Guerin

    As you said, a great mix of both is the best case scenario. However, with limited resources, I’d go with utility first. Form follows function!

    On the other hand, “crappy” design is a good way to validate an idea. I mean, we succeeded in converting users into clients despite a crude website and design. Now that we put more resources on design and got a new website, we expect to see even more conversions.

  • http://www.GiftOasis.com Ron Clabo

    Which is more important: the look and feel of a service or how it actually works? I think the question presents a false choice. To me, they are _both_ more important, more important than a lot of other things that entrepreneurs often spend time on.

    Entrepreneurs wear alot of hats and must oversee or directly work on tasks from a wide variety of disciplines. It’s not uncommon for us to question how our time is spent and the value of each task that demands attention. These are good questions to be asking. But when it comes to getting the services right and getting the look and feel right, the time invested is likely well spent.

    -Ron

    • http://www.markevanstech.com Mark Evans

      Ron: I agree they are both necessary elements. I think part of the debate is how design is seen as sexy while utility is taken as a given. The reality is both are sexy and a given! Thanks for the comment. Mark

  • Pingback: MacStartup » Startups: How Design Is Done