Crashing Hard Drives & the Goodness of the Cloud

How’s this for having a bad week: First, the spinning beachball of death starts to get even worse on my MacBook Pro. Then, I boot up my relatively new iMac, and rather than a beautiful blue screen, I get the white screen of death with a file folder blinking back at me, which is never a good sign.

First reaction: “Crap”.

Second reaction: “I hope my AppleCare hasn’t expired”.

Third reaction: “Great, another trip to Carbon Computing”.

If there is a silver lining to a double shot of computer woes, it is that an increasing amount of my computing has migrated to the cloud. I’m a big user of Google Docs to handle word documents and spreadsheets. I made the move to Google Apps and GMail a few months ago. And DropBox has become a “virtual” harddrive/storage depot for lots of personal and professional documents.

It means that having hard drives go crash and burn isn’t a catastrophe as much as an aggravation. When I was told the hard drive on the MacBook Pro would likely have to be replaced, I just cut and paste a bunch of data into DropBox, which was a snap because I happily pay $99/year for 50GB of storage.

Putting your computing world into the cloud can be a leap of faith but it’s a no-brainer for people like myself who are mobile and use different devices to access data and services. At the end of the day, hard drive problems are still a pain in the rear end but rather than being a disaster, they’re bumps in the road.

And, of course, I had everything backed up on an external hard drive just in case because it’s always good to have a backup plan!

Connected’s Delightful Approach to CRM

One of my core beliefs about online startups is how they have to delight users. It means offering users a service that addresses their needs in a user-friendly, intuitive and accessible way to meet a need or solve a problem.

Without the delight “factor”, most startups will struggle to capture the attention and loyalty of users no matter how well they are at digital marketing, social media, media coverage, etc.

For anyone looking for an excellent example of delight, here’s one I discovered recently: Connected, which was recently acquired by LinkedIn. As part of the deal, Connected has gone from $9.99/month to free.

Connected is a customer relationship management service that describes itself as “the easiest way to manage your professional contacts”. For anyone who has used CRM, they can be labour-intensive and not terribly user-friendly, particularly for small business owners who don’t have the time to constantly update and tend a database.

A CRM Made Easy

What makes Connected different and delightful is the ease of creating and maintaining a contact database and, as important, getting information and intelligence out of it.

Connected’s power starts with the ability to import contacts from LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook, address books, applications such as Google Voice and Evernote, and e-mail marketing tools such as MailChimp and Constant Contact. In little time, Connected creates an extensive database that can then be searched, annotated, enhanced and expanded.

Even more delightful is the ability to look up a contact, and quickly see recent status updates on Twitter and LinkedIn, blog posts, their LinkedIn profile, mutual contacts and a healthy amount of personal information (e-mail address, corporate information and personal Web sites such as their blog, speaking About.me page, etc.)

For anyone who has resisted the use of CRM or never thought about using a CRM, Connected is a simple and straightforward way to use a tool that offers lots of information, easy navigation and plenty of value without investing a lot of time and effort.

In other words, Connected has created a CRM that delights, which probably explains why it was snapped up by LinkedIn.

Startups and the Importance of Storytelling

After my post yesterday on how Canadian start-ups should get more attention, David Crow wrote a spirited rebuttal on StartupNorth taking issue with parts of my argument.

This included that fact that “…as an entrepreneur you need to learn how to rise above the noise and tell stories that the media want to share with their readers.”

I wanted to highlight “tell stories” because it a crucial element many startups fail to embrace. They build interesting or valuable services or products only to discover what they’re doing doesn’t resonate with consumers, reporters or bloggers.

In many cases, it’s not the product or service but that consumers, reporters and bloggers don’t understand what it does, the benefits and why they should be interested in it. In a competitive marketplace, a failure to communicate is a startup killer. If your target audiences don’t quickly “get” what you’re pitching, they move on to the next thing.

The challenges for startups is they tend to not be good storytellings. They’re good developers, product visionaries and entrepreneurs but they may not have the skills and insight to create compelling stories.

A good story does a couple of things: It tells people what the product or service does and the benefits of using (aka Why should I, the consumer, care about what you do?/What’s in it for me?). This is table stakes. The next step is taking is taking the story and putting it into context or part of a bigger story.

Too many startups attempt to attraction attention for what they’re doing. It the: “Hey, look at us, we’ve built something new and cool with some neat bells and whistles that no one else has so you should pay attention”. Unless you’ve got the luck of the Irish, it’s highly unlikely this approach will work.

Instead, startups have to think big picture. They need to look at what they have built, the benefits of their product/service, and the points of pain they’re addressing, and insert themselves into a larger story they are a part of rather than trying to be the focus.

For example, a startup may have created a service to have conversations with other people while watching TV. In and of itself, that may be interesting but it’s likely not terribly compelling or attention-worthy.

If, however, you create a story on how the couch potato is being killed off because people want TV-watching to be engaging and interactive, and include examples of this new phenomena, it may be a story that could resonate with the media and reporters.

The other important thing about the media and bloggers is getting coverage can be a crapshoot. Even with well-crafted stories, there are no guarantees a reporter or blogger will decide to write about what you. They are inundated with pitches, and there is only so much time and space to write stories or posts. Sometimes, they just have to choose among one of many interesting ideas.

Given this landscape, there’s another key ingredient to remember: relationship building. It’s easier to get coverage if you know a reporter or blogger. Truth be told, reporters and bloggers will write stories or include companies within stories if they like the people involved.

As David mentioned in his post, one of the reasons Sprouter has attracted so much coverage is Sarah Prevette and Erin Bury have done a terrific job of building relationships with reporters and bloggers. This got the company coverage even though Sprouter was struggling as a business.

The bottom line is you’re a startup that wants coverage, create compelling stories – and get some external help if that’s what it takes to get it done – and reach out to bloggers and the media. It doesn’t ensure coverage but it’s a step in the right direction.

Do Canadian Startups Get Enough Attention?

During the meshwest conference earlier this week in Edmonton, a startup panel featuring Jevon MacDonald, Maura Rodgers and Dups Wijayawardhana spawned a discussion about whether Canadian startups get enough media and blogger attention.

At the risk of being assailed by newspapers, magazines, Web sites and blogs that do write about Canadian startups, I would suggest the answer to whether startups get enough attention is “No”.

Granted, I’m biased because I’m fairly immersed in the startup world. But the fact is there are a lot of great startup stories that go unreported or receive a smidgen of the coverage they deserve. It is a situation that frustrates entrepreneurs, investors and people within the startup community who believe the spotlight should be burning a lot hotter.

Where’s the Love?

So why aren’t Canadian startups getting more love and attention?

When it comes to traditional media, I would suggest startups aren’t that big of a deal for most business editors. Unless a startup raises a lot of money – let’s say more than $25-million – or gets acquired for a lot of money – let’s say $50-million – there’s not much appetite for stories about startups.

When I was a newspaper reporter, one of the most common questions I got from editors when pitching a startup story was “What’s their revenue?”.  As privately-owned companies, I didn’t know, which does little to get an editor excited. Another issue is smaller newsroom, which means there are few, if any, reporters devoted to technology.

Within the Canadian blogosphere, the situation is somewhat better, although not overwhelming.

There’s a solid group of blogs such as Startup North, TechVibes, Next Montreal, Maple Butter and Startup CFO writing about startups, but selfishly I’d like to see a lot more blogs writing about startups. (Note: If you’re a blogger who writes about Canadian startups, wave the flag in the comments!).

A Great Time for Startup Coverage to Flourish

If there was ever a time for startup coverage to flourish in Canada, it’s now. As I have mentioned several times before (let me know if I’m sounding like a broken record!), this is the most exciting time for Canadian startups in the past 15 years. There’s never been so many entrepreneurs doing so many interesting things.

At the same time, it appears Canada may finally be getting a solid enough investment ecosystem to support more of these entrepreneurs so they can turn ideas or bootstrapped businesses into something with real traction and customers.

What do you think? Do Canadian startups getting enough attention? Who are the traditional media or bloggers doing it?

To 4S or Not 4S, That is the Problem

Apple, Apple, Apple. So brilliant, seductive and alluring.

The hits keep coming and the new products keep on getting released, even if they are just minor upgrades to the previous product such as the iPhone 4S.

Even though there was disappointment, the 4S wasn’t a iPhone5, it’s still something new from Apple, which is always a good thing for the growing Apple Nation.

The question is whether we’re strong enough to resist the temptation to upgrade. Is getting the new thing irresistible, or should we live with what we’ve got.

The iPhone4S called out to me yesterday when, coincidentally, my battered and bruised 3GS fell on the floor. The glass panel shattered, bringing on agony but, at the same time, the ecstatic realization that it had created a window of opportunity to get a 4S. It was like a spiritual Steve Jobs had lightly pushed my 3GS off the shelf.

So what to do, what to do? Spend $300 or $400 on a 4S, or hold onto the 3GS given saving money seems to a good thing these days. Or should I buy an iPhone4 that the carriers have slashed prices on to move out excess inventory?

The back and forth when considering Apple products is agonizing. One minute, a 4S is a slam-dunk; the next minute you decide not to jump on the bandwagon.

In the end, I got the 3GS fixed. For now, I have a functional iPhone again, which will suit my needs and, as important, provide some more time to decide whether to get the 4S.

Can Teenagers Save the BlackBerry?

It may seem strange to talk about the much-beleaguered BlackBerry as the iPhone5 is making its debut but given there will be a tsunami of iPhone5 coverage but I thought it might be a good idea to go against the smartphone grain.

So, here’s my thinking about the BlackBerry, which struck me again when I went to a friend’s 20th anniversary party last weekend, and saw many of the teenage children using BlackBerrys.

While the cool kids and geeks love the iPhone, teenagers seem – and this is purely anecdotal - to like the BlackBerry. The biggest reason seems to be the keyboard makes it easy to use Facebook, Twitter, text-messaging and BBM. The BlackBerry may not be as sexy anymore but it meets the needs of a large and influential demographic at a time when touchscreen-based smartphones are here, there and everywhere.

The question is what Research in Motion should do about teenagers. Embrace them? Ignore them? The biggest challenges are two-fold: the BlackBerry has mostly been a corporate tool used by older people (aka more than 30-years-0ld), and RIM is not a particularly savvy marketing company.

This could make it difficult to RIM to effectively pursue and engage teenagers unless it embraces a new approach and arms itself with executives and an advertising agency that get teenagers.

A Split Personality

At the same time, RIM also needs to solidify its strong foothold in the corporate market. It means RIM may have to sport a split-personality by focusing its sales and marketing efforts at divergent parts of the smartphone market: older corporate, suit-wearing types and teenagers.

Can RIM pull it off? Time will tell but the upside for RIM is it appears the new BlackBerry 9900 has enough goodness to establish itself as an attractive option for both demographics that still find the BlackBerry to be compelling or, at least, a better option than the iPhone.

Links:

- A survey in the U.K. shows that older mobile users went for the iPhone4, while teenagers prefer BlackBerrys.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...