Pretty soon, Nortel will finally disappear after two and a half years of bankruptcy protection.
The final chapter will be written when an auction of 6,000 patents will be completed – a process that has apparently attracted more than 100 interested parties, including Google and Research in Motion. The auction is expected to generate $1.5-billion.
It’s sad ending to what was a telecom powerhouse and Canada’s leading high-tech company. It was only a decade ago that then-CEO John Roth was talking about Nortel reaching $40-billion in sales.
There are a myriad of reasons why Nortel went from the penthouse to the outhouse – a lengthy list that includes bad acquisitions, terrible strategic decisions, CEOs that never should have been CEOs, financial scandals and intense competition.
But perhaps the hardest pill to swallow is how Nortel, specifically its senior management and the board, surrendered rather than fight on. After filing for bankruptcy protection, Nortel could have restructured to emerge as a smaller, more focused, more competitive and less debt-laden entity.
Instead, Nortel CEO Mike Zafirovski and the board, no doubt pressured by debt holders, decided to launch a scorched earth strategy by selling everything. While these sales have generated billions of dollars for creditors, Nortel will soon be no more.
The sale of Nortel’s patents is disheartening because there is so much great technology within the portfolio, particularly the company’s long-term evolution technology that will increase the speed and capacity of mobile networks. A former Nortel director, Sorin Cohn, estimates the buyers of Nortel’s patents could make as much as $15-billion from creating new products.
Astounding and saddening.
In an ideal world, Nortel would still be alive and well. Maybe it would only be a company with 5,000 employees operating in a few markets such as wireless. But that’s a better scenario that completely disappearing from the telecom landscape.
RIP, Nortel.
I think the faulty presumption is that the acquirers of said patents intend to go off and build something. No, the primary reason for purchasing the patents is as a defense against competitors, allowing them to sue pretty-much anyone who innovates independently within the vicinity of the patents.
It is yet another example of the idiocy of patent law that they survive insolvency and are perceived as “assets” abstract of the artefacts that they describe. This is bullshit and must come to an end so that we can innovate.
Ian,
Good insight. Thanks for the comment. cheers, Mark
RIM chaos overestimated, but . . . : Canada's online magazine: Politics, entertainment, technology, media, arts, books: backofthebook.ca
[...] With all the talk about Research in Motion’s financial and marketshare struggles, many people tend to overlook the fact that it is still a wireless behemoth, albeit one with intense and growing competition. But it’s not just another “a Nortel.”. [...]
Nortel Goes Out With a Bang
[...] I mentioned in a blog post on Mark Evans Tech recently, Nortel was also the victim of the puzzling decision to surrender rather than fight on. A [...]