Is the World Finally Ready for the Social Browser?

In 2005, Flock launched amid extensive…and then is promptly bombed.

Released as an alpha (a dumb idea no matter how you try to slice it), Flock attempted to become the “social browser”. One of its many shortcomings is it tried to be all things to all people, which only confused everyone. While Flock is still around, it never recovered from its inauspicious debut.

Fast-forward five years and we’ve got another much-hyped social browser, Rockmelt. There are two things that differentiates Rockmelt from Flock. One, the world is probably ready for a social browser whereas Flock was likely ahead of its time. Second, Rockmelt is backed by Marc Andresseen, the guy who created the Netscape browser before it was swamped by Internet Explorer.

My first impression of Rockmelt is mixed. I guess the biggest hurdle is the tight integration with Facebook. To get Rockmelt, you need to provide your Facebook username and password, and provide Rockmelt with access to a lot of your data. As a recalcitrant Facebook user, this is far from ideal – it would be better to have a standalone download.

The upside is Rockmelt looks solid, and avoids Flock’s mistake of trying to do too much. It looks and feels like a Web browser, which may appear like a straightforward proposition but, nevertheless, is important given people will compare how it performs to IE, Firefox and Chrome. (See the screenshot below that displays a Facebook stream.)

It also has solid integration with Facebook and Twitter. You can post updates on Facebook and Twitter directly from Rockmelt, as well as check out your Facebook and Twitter streams, and see the status of Facebook friends within a stream that sits on the left-hand side of the browser. I’m not totally clear about feeds feature, which strikes me as a frill as opposed to something that will appeal to many users.

Rockmelt’s biggest challenge, of course, is trying to gain a foothold in the highly-competitive browser market, particularly given that Google’s Chrome has changed the dynamics by stealing Firefox’s title as the hot, new kid on the block.

There is no doubt Rockmelt’s usage and investment prospects hinge on its Facebook integration. If positioned and marketed properly, Rockmelt could become the browser for many of the 540 million Facebook users looking for a browser that meets their need to browse the Web and be connected to Facebook.

By becoming the Facebook browser before Facebook could create one itself, it seems like a no-brainer Rockmelt will eventually be purchased by Facebook.

Of course, this is the way Silicon Valley works when everyone is so connected. A nudge here, a wink there, a few million dollars in venture capital, and, voila, the next hot start-up is purchased by one of the Web giants.

Why Social Media Programs Fail

There is no lack of focus on social media success stories, even though we keep talking about the same ones (e.g. Old Spice, Dell, Starbucks, Dunkin’ Donuts, etc.) over and over again.

But what about social media failure? There’s little attention paid to campaigns and programs that drop the ball, blow up or, frankly, are a waste of time and money. The thing about failure is it shouldn’t be shoved into the corner and alone. Failure needs to be scrutinized, explored and studied so we can understand how to create successful efforts.

Here are some of the leading reasons why success can be so elusive:

1. Unrealistic expectations: Like anything new and exciting, many companies have completely unrealistic goals about what social media can achieve. It can’t turn good products into good, it can’t transform your brand overnight, and it can’t turn bad customer service into stellar customer service. By setting the bar way too high, companies set themselves up for disappointment.

2. A failure to execute: There’s a lot of talk about social media but far too often not a lot of walk. Everyone gets excited about social media strategic and tactical plans but when it comes to actually implementing them, the ball gets drops. This usually happens after the novelty of social media wears off. It stops being exciting, and start to become a daily grind. Let’s be honest, social media on a day-to-day basis is hard work with little glamour, which explains why execution can be so challenging.

3. A lack of transparency: It is impossible to reinvent yourself on social media. A company can’t suddenly embrace a new identity. Instead, it needs to use social media to gradually change how it does business and deals with customers. But at the same time, it has to be true to itself.

4. Too much of a focus on sales: Social media not about the hard sell; it’s a soft sell environment. There is lots of talk about how Dell has sold several million dollars of products on Twitter but people forget that Dell’s total revenue is more than $50 billion, which makes its social media sales a drop in the bucket. Companies that try use overtly social media to drive sales as opposed to provide value-added information about their products/services or engage with customers will fail.

5. Un-social goals such as boosting Twitter followers or Facebook “Likes”: Social media isn’t a numbers game; it’s a platform to build relationships and your brand, and encourage conversations with existing and potential customers, employees, suppliers, etc. Getting lots of followers or “Likes” is a dividend of having an engaged social media program.

6. Too much attention paid to creating something to go viral: It is difficult, if not impossible, to create something that will go viral on social media. Something that goes viral has as much to do with luck and being in the right place at the right time as it is about great content and creativity.

7. Trying to be all things to all people: This is otherwise known as the “shotgun approach” in which a company embraces lots of social media tools to establish an extensive presence. What often happens is they spread themselves too thin and, as a result, do everyone in a mediocre way. A better approach is doing fewer things but doing those things as well as you can.

8. The lack of a corporate champion. Since social media is a relatively new corporate activity, it is important to have someone within the organization who can lead the charge every day. This is someone who believes in the potential of social media at a time when there is more focus on return on investment.

9. Bad or not enough content: There is lot of focus on the tools but content is still king, and that includes social media. Without a steady supply of content (blog posts, tweets, updates, video, photos, contests, etc.), it is difficult to engage consumers a regular basis. That being said, content is not easy to create but it can be a great investment.

10. A lack of social media talent to operate programs: The tools let you do lots of different and interesting things but people use and power them. Without good and experienced talent, social media efforts can be for naught.

Note: This post originally appeared on the Sysomos blog.

My Week in Blogging

Although Mark Evans Tech is my personal blog, it’s not the only one that I write on a regular basis. I have a Twitter-focused blog called Twitterrati and, as Sysomos’ director of communications, I write its corporate blog. And then, there’s my “Start” column for the Globe & Mail. With so much content being written each week, I thought it might be helpful to highlight a few posts:

Mark Evans Tech
- The Harsh Truth of Social Media Tactical Economics, which looks at how social media tactics is poised to become a low-margin business as companies look at the costs of making social media happen on a regular basis.
- The Renaissance of the Web Site: Social media might be getting a lot of attention but my consulting business is more busy building new Web sites or refreshing existing sites.

Sysomos
- 10 Reasons Why Social Media Fails: A look at some the leading reasons why social media efforts fall flat.
- Five Key Ingredients for a Successful Corporate Blog

Twitterrati
- Twitter’s Ecosystem Revenue Conundrum: The challenges Twitter faces driving revenue and making sure it keeps the developer ecosystem healthy as well.

Globe & Mail “Start”
- Klout Measures Influence level on Twitter: A Q&A with Klout.com founder Joe Fernandez

The Renaissance of the Web Site

If there has been a major theme within my consulting business in 2010, it hasn’t been social media. That may be a surprise to many people given the buzz about social media and how it is being increasingly embraced.

But, by far, the most popular request from clients has been the creation of new or refreshed Web sites, which not only includes design and development but new content, including videos.

My take is many companies ignored their Web sites during the economic boom because why changes something when you don’t have to do it. But now that the economic landscape is still volatile and the Web has become more important as a communications, marketing and sales vehicle, many companies have decided now is the time to refresh and update their Web sites.

At the same time, many customers want more control over the look and feel of their Web sites. They don’t want to depend on a Web developer to make small changes and, as important, get charged for them. This is why we have been building most of Web sites using WordPress because it gives customers control over content – something they have been enthusiastic about.

Given this approach, it was interesting to see the Yellow Pages announce plans to build Web sites for smaller clients as the company attempt to drive more digital revenue.

From the outside looking in, Yellow Page will build cookie-cutter Web sites for small businesses that have more to do with being Google-friendly than have great design. This approach is good if you want a functional Web site but probably doesn’t do much if you’re looking for a Web site that really engages visitors. Then again, many businesses don’t have Web sites so the Yellow Pages is probably a good way to get started.

“Artistic value doesn’t rank very high – doesn’t rank anywhere on the Google algorithm,” said Yellow Pages CEO Marc Tellier in describing the company’s approach.

For many companies, this cookie-cutter approach is fine but from what we’ve been seeing, there are lots of companies looking for a high-quality Web site that does more than appeal to Google’s algorithm. As well, a compelling Web site is more than having some widgets and a few pages, it also needs good content.

Need an Email Nudge? Try NudgeMail

If you’re like me and spend a lot of time in your inbox, here’s a new tool that may make your life easier.

It’s called NudgeMail, and it’s a simple, yet smart, tool to remind yourself about important e-mails as opposed to trying to put them in special folders or trying to remember them.

NudgeMail lets you send yourself reminders about things that have to be done, meetings, conference calls, etc. All you need to do is send an e-mail to an nudgemail.com address to set things up. Even better, NudgeMail is free and you don’t have to register.

So, here’s how it works. Let’s say you have a phone call tomorrow. To create a reminder, you would send or forward an e-mail to tomorrow@nudgemail.com. Or you could send an email to nov4@nudgemail.com. These are just a few examples of NudgeMail’s different commands.

While NudgeMail may not be for everyone, it’s a pretty interesting service for those of us with too many emails and too much to remember. NudgeMail works with pretty much anything – GMail, iPhone, Blackberry, Outlook, Android, etc.

The Harsh Truth of Social Media Tactical Economics

After a company has created a strategic plan for social media, the next move is tactical execution. And while the tools are free, it costs money to use them. A company may need to hire someone internally to run their social media activities, which could cost $50,000 to $75,000 depending on the program being implemented and how much experience may be required to do the job.

Another option is outsourcing social media tactics by hiring a contractor or public relations agency. Here’s where the economics of social media start to get complicated and more interesting.

Let’s assume that you need someone to put in at least two to three hours/day to be engaged on social media and create content. At $40/hour, this works out to $1600 to $2500/month, which is probably a reasonable investment given it provides social media coverage without the need to hire a full-time employee.

The other scenario is hiring a PR agency. The biggest and immediate sticking point is $40/hour for a PR agency would be dirt cheap – something that doesn’t work within the current economic of the public relations agency.

For now, PR agencies are charging $75 to $150/hour to do social media tactics. This means a company needs to spend $3000 to $6000/month, which is pretty hefty investment, particularly for companies just starting to get into social media. For PR agencies, however, social media tactics is currently a high-margin service that is filling the void as traditional PR activities such as creating and distributing press releases starts to disappear. As a result, PR agencies are reluctant to do anything to kill the golden social media goose.

The problem, however, is they may no choice but to eventually align themselves to the new economic reality. If $40 to $50/hour become the standard to do social media tactics, then PR agencies will have to drop their prices. This means they will need to adopt a new approach that doesn’t see them charging $75 to $150/hour. It could mean hiring younger and cheaper employees to do social media tactics. It may become a low-margin business, which could mean that the money comes from offering creative and content services.

I do not expect this economic reality to hit home soon but it’s coming. As companies get more familiar social media, they are going to weigh the benefits of hiring someone internally for $50,000 to $75,000, or hire an external partner. Unless outsourcing PR offers tangible and significant economic advantages, it makes complete to sense to hire someone who drinks the corporate Kool-Aid every day.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...