Google Buzz’s launch earlier this week has attracted as much attention about the “why” as the “what”. Among the leading “why” questions:
1. Why did Google launch Buzz?
Is it merely to establish a better foothold in the social media universe given Google has a low presence? Does Google see a problem that it can tackle such as filtering the amount of social media “noise”? Or, as Steve Rubel suggests, is Google Buzz an attempt by Google to protect GMail from Facebook’s bigger plans for the e-mail market.
2. Why has Google spent the past few days upgrading, fixing and re-loading on Buzz, highlighted today by a “new start-up experience”? It’s difficult not to get the impression that Buzz was rushed out the door before it was fully baked. I mean, Google has an army of product development people who could have easily picked off some of complaints before Buzz went prime-time. Instead, Buzz has been abuzz with fixes fueled by a flurry of feedback.
3. Why isn’t Buzz’s value proposition more compelling? Sure, it has some interesting bells and whistles such as the ability to write updates longer than 140 characters and integration to other services but Buzz doesn’t a compelling raison d’etre that would convince people to give up Facebook or Twitter.
There’s no doubt Buzz will likely attract a group of enthusiastic users but right now it doesn’t appear to be Killer anything; instead Buzz looks like a nice, niche service. After using it for a few days, it’s one of those services that you check a few times before moving on.
Any thoughts about these questions?



