Google Buzz: Why, Why, Why?

Google Buzz’s launch earlier this week has attracted as much attention about the “why” as the “what”. Among the leading “why” questions:

1. Why did Google launch Buzz?

Is it merely to establish a better foothold in the social media universe given Google has a low presence? Does Google see a problem that it can tackle such as filtering the amount of social media “noise”? Or, as Steve Rubel suggests, is Google Buzz an attempt by Google to protect GMail from Facebook’s bigger plans for the e-mail market.

2. Why has Google spent the past few days upgrading, fixing and re-loading on Buzz, highlighted today by a “new start-up experience”? It’s difficult not to get the impression that Buzz was rushed out the door before it was fully baked. I mean, Google has an army of product development people who could have easily picked off some of complaints before Buzz went prime-time. Instead, Buzz has been abuzz with fixes fueled by a flurry of feedback.

3. Why isn’t Buzz’s value proposition more compelling? Sure, it has some interesting bells and whistles such as the ability to write updates longer than 140 characters and integration to other services but Buzz doesn’t a compelling raison d’etre that would convince people to give up Facebook or Twitter.

There’s no doubt Buzz will likely attract a group of enthusiastic users but right now it doesn’t appear to be Killer anything; instead Buzz looks like a nice, niche service. After using it for a few days, it’s one of those services that you check a few times before moving on.

Any thoughts about these questions?

A Weekly Content Recap

I spend a lot of time writing and reading so figured it might be a good idea to share of the more interesting things that I’ve written and come across:

My posts:
- A Pragmatic Approach to Social Media, which suggests that companies should be strategic when it comes to social media.
- Is There a Limit to Our Public-Ness? – an exploration of how much information people happily share on the Web.
- Google’s Biggest Challenge: Capturing Digital Turf, which looks at how Google Buzz may find it difficult to get people to leave or spend less time with Facebook, Twitter, Friendfeed, etc.
- The Mysteries of the Viral Video, a look at why some videos go viral (Sysomos blog)

Interesting posts from other bloggers:
- eMarketer: Why You Need a Social Media Strategy
- Evolving in Social Media Monitoring (Engaging Times)
- Measuring Return on Social Engagement (eMarketer)
- How to test if your startup idea will succeed (Untemplar)

Other interesting stuff:
- I started using Dropbox for the first time with a client this week. Excellent tool.
- W3 Total Cache, a plug-in that promises to offer WordPress performance optimization
- GoPetition, a free and user-friendly online petition service. Check out the petition I created to save programming at the arena in my community.

The First Real-Time Olympics

In many ways, the Olympic Games happening this month in Vancouver are the first real-time/social media Olympics.

If you’ve been following Twitter during the opening ceremonies, it gives you a completely different perspective on Olympic coverage – it’s real-time, cutting, critical, honest and extremely funny and entertaining.

I can’t wait until the Olympics actually start, and the athletes start performing. In real-time, performances are going to be praised, applauded, criticized, poked and prodded.

In many ways, I think the social media coverage will be far more interesting and entertaining than the Olympics itself.

Google Here, Google Everywhere

I started using Google Chrome recently. Although it’s an extension-free version, it’s very good – fast and with a cool search feature that also doubles as the place where URL addresses appear. It’s yet another Google tool with my digital toolbox, along with search (regular, blog and image), GMail, Google Reader, Google Maps and YouTube.

As much as you may want to resist, it’s difficult to not be part of the ever-expanding Google empire. Most of their services work really well, and they’re free. Before you know it, your digital world is dominated by Google.

One of the questions it raises is whether there’s a limit to the size of Google’s empire, and whether are any markets that it is not prepared to enter. This week, for example, Google’s strategic “diary” included:

- The launch of Google Buzz, an attempt to establish a foothold in the fast-growing social media universe
- The purchase Aardvark, an online Q&A service, for $50-million.
- An ambitious plan to build a high-speed fiber network.

Whether it’s new services, acquisitions and major projects, Google is the Roman Empire of the 21st Century. Its reach, dominance and portfolio of services is amazing and, at the same time, somewhat troubling. At the end of the day, the question is whether is Google is good for the Internet? Does its dominance and strategic ambitious allow for a vibrant and innovative Internet that features a healthy ecosystem with a variety of players in each marketplace?

Maybe it’s not a question that can be answered right now but it’s a subject worth spending more time on. As much as Google’s products and services are great, there’s a price to be paid even though they’re free.

A Pragmatic Approach to Social Media

Given the amount of buzz, hype and enthusiasm surrounding social media, a lot of companies are scrambling to climb on the bandwagon. They’re convinced that if they don’t move now, it will be too late. Much of its anxiousness is propelled by high-profile social media success stories such as Dell, Starbucks or Comcast. It has created a situation where many business want to embrace social media as soon as possible.

This is the wrong approach.

The reality is social media is still in its infancy. The success stories that attract attention from bloggers and the mainstream media are exceptions to the rule. They’re the “lottery winners” who have succeeded due to a combination of timing, luck and being in the right place at the right time. It also helps if you make a major investment in social media at a time when many competitors aren’t even in the game.

Given this situation, I’ve become a social media pragmatist. While it’s important and necessary for many companies to embrace social media as a way to expand and enhance their marketing, communications and sales efforts, there’s still plenty of time to develop the right approach that meets your strategic needs and objectives.

Over the past few months, I’ve been working with a growing number of clients interested in social media. Here are three questions that I ask:

1. Why do you want to do social media? Is it because social media is cool and new? Are competitors using it? Does it fit into how a company does business, particularly companies that are consumer-facing, and want to engage with customers in a new and different way? These questions establish a company’s motivations, and whether social media is really what they want to do and worth the investment required.

2. What kind of social media do you want to do? This means getting a good handle on a company’s customers, their Web savviness, and what kind of social media services they are using. If many of a company’s customers are into Facebook, then Facebook might be fertile territory to establish a social media presence.

3. Who’s going to do social media, and are you willing to make a long-term commitment? For many companies, this is the biggest hurdle because it means getting past the tools, and focusing on who within the organization is going to implement a social media tactical plan and, as important, sustain it on a day-in-day-out basis. Getting started with social media is relatively easy; grunting it out each day can be a challenge.

These questions might seem simplistic or straightforward but they’re fundamental in determining whether a company understands what’s involved with social media, and whether it’s really willing to do what it takes to make it happen. If a company can work through these three questions, then it’s a lot easier to move on to tactics.

Google Buzz’s Biggest Challenge: Digital Turf

I haven’t been able to try Google Buzz yet but here are some more thoughts from the outside looking in.

The decision to use GMail as the platform to establish a foothold within social media is smart – probably the second best thing Google could have done aside from buying Twitter. The idea of creating a service within something that 175 million people use each month makes total sense.

Google Buzz also scores points with a nice suite of features so it can be used to provide links to other social media platforms – something will expand down the road. Being able to create mini-Web sites from each update is also interesting.

That said, Google Buzz faces some major challenges. Perhaps the biggest is how willing people will be embrace yet another social media service when many people are already using Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, LinkedIn, Ning, etc.

Once someone has their social media “tool box”, it can be difficult to squeeze in another tool – even if it has some utility. It’s the reason, for example, that I have resisted multiple invitations to join Plaxo. While I’ve heard good things about Plaxo, I don’t have the appetite or interest in using it because it would just be yet another tool.

Google Buzz could face the same challenge trying to establish a foothold beyond bleeding-edge users. Its adoption could come down to whether it proves itself to be more useful and user-friendly so it starts to replace other tools – Facebook, Twitter, etc. in digital tool boxes.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...