I’m doing a presentation this week in Burlington looking at the most interesting technology trends for 2010, and one of the no-brainer items is the real-time Web. The problem, however, is the more time I spend looking at the real-time Web, the more I wonder about why people are so excited.
I get that information published on Twitter, Facebook and blogs will be instantly and readily available. I get that news reporting will be instantaneous, and I get that search will become a lot more interesting because it will deliver up-to-the-second information. That’s all very exciting but is it enough to justify the hype surrounding real-time? In other words, is that it?
I guess it might come across as naive but shouldn’t there be a lot more involved? What is the significance of the real-time Web other than information gets published, delivered and consumed faster than ever before? How does that really change things?
In a sense, it’s difficult not be think that the hype about real-time reflects its potential as opposed to the current reality. Looking ahead, you can see that real-time could have a major impact on online collaboration. As well, the ability to analyze a huge amount of data in real-time will have a major impact on e-commerce, pricing and inventory management.
That’s all well and good but for now, real-time strikes me as interesting but not tangible enough to get caught up on the hype machine.







One Comment
the real time web is in its infancy. With time, more tools, relevance, and technology will be added