<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Loses as Social Media Wins?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2010/01/23/what-loses-as-social-media-wins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2010/01/23/what-loses-as-social-media-wins/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Startups, Entrepreneurs and the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:25:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Long</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2010/01/23/what-loses-as-social-media-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-346674</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 18:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=5476#comment-346674</guid>
		<description>I personally find myself being slowly trained to be less capable of concentrating on a single thing for a long period of time. Even when I am trying to write a document at work, I find myself &quot;switching&quot; rapidly to check Outlook or my IM every few minutes. This is a pattern of behavior that has been trained based on how Outlook functions, by checking email every 10-15 minutes. A new email must be responded to or read right away, of course, and this trains our brains to &quot;fragment&quot; our attention. 

The antidote? For me, it&#039;s meditation. Practicing single-pointed awareness for 10 to 20 minutes at a time is just the beginning, but undertaken as  daily practice, I think it can be quite balancing to the always-on mentality of the modern world. 

Love the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally find myself being slowly trained to be less capable of concentrating on a single thing for a long period of time. Even when I am trying to write a document at work, I find myself &#8220;switching&#8221; rapidly to check Outlook or my IM every few minutes. This is a pattern of behavior that has been trained based on how Outlook functions, by checking email every 10-15 minutes. A new email must be responded to or read right away, of course, and this trains our brains to &#8220;fragment&#8221; our attention. </p>
<p>The antidote? For me, it&#8217;s meditation. Practicing single-pointed awareness for 10 to 20 minutes at a time is just the beginning, but undertaken as  daily practice, I think it can be quite balancing to the always-on mentality of the modern world. </p>
<p>Love the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2010/01/23/what-loses-as-social-media-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-194052</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=5476#comment-194052</guid>
		<description>Based on the last two comments, then what we lose is the amount of attention given to the information we process. It doesn&#039;t matter if its for work or for recreative pourposes. The quantity of our attention decreases. This has a subsequent impact: If we reduce the amount of quantity of attention, we will decrease the quality also. Then there is simple question to be asked... Which information is worth the time to process and which not?... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on the last two comments, then what we lose is the amount of attention given to the information we process. It doesn&#039;t matter if its for work or for recreative pourposes. The quantity of our attention decreases. This has a subsequent impact: If we reduce the amount of quantity of attention, we will decrease the quality also. Then there is simple question to be asked&#8230; Which information is worth the time to process and which not?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @karenmanley</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2010/01/23/what-loses-as-social-media-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-193923</link>
		<dc:creator>@karenmanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=5476#comment-193923</guid>
		<description>I think people tend to half do many things at the same time, so I find myself with FB on in the background of my screen, TV on and talking to friends on MSN or something, so no one thing gets 100% of my attention. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think people tend to half do many things at the same time, so I find myself with FB on in the background of my screen, TV on and talking to friends on MSN or something, so no one thing gets 100% of my attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Loses as Social Media Wins?&#160;&#124;&#160;netdesk</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2010/01/23/what-loses-as-social-media-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-193907</link>
		<dc:creator>What Loses as Social Media Wins?&#160;&#124;&#160;netdesk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=5476#comment-193907</guid>
		<description>[...] Loses as Social Media Wins?  Just reading an interesting article by Mark Evans (Thanks Mark, got me thinking) on what loses out as your time on Social Media increases. I though [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Loses as Social Media Wins?  Just reading an interesting article by Mark Evans (Thanks Mark, got me thinking) on what loses out as your time on Social Media increases. I though [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Panic Attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2010/01/23/what-loses-as-social-media-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-193894</link>
		<dc:creator>The Panic Attacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=5476#comment-193894</guid>
		<description>[...] What Loses as Social Media Wins? &#124; Mark Evans Tech [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What Loses as Social Media Wins? | Mark Evans Tech [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @thomaspower</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2010/01/23/what-loses-as-social-media-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-193889</link>
		<dc:creator>@thomaspower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=5476#comment-193889</guid>
		<description>we simply process more information in a day than our parents did in a month </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we simply process more information in a day than our parents did in a month</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention What Loses as Social Media Wins? &#124; Mark Evans Tech -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2010/01/23/what-loses-as-social-media-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-193886</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention What Loses as Social Media Wins? &#124; Mark Evans Tech -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=5476#comment-193886</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mark Evans, marcopolis, Fred Carpenter, Bob Bicknell, Lior and others. Lior said: What Loses as Social Media Wins? http://bit.ly/66O8lU [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mark Evans, marcopolis, Fred Carpenter, Bob Bicknell, Lior and others. Lior said: What Loses as Social Media Wins? <a href="http://bit.ly/66O8lU" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/66O8lU</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

