<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Life Beyond &#8220;Conversation&#8221; and &#8220;Engage&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/10/27/life-beyond-conversation-and-engage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/10/27/life-beyond-conversation-and-engage/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Startups, Entrepreneurs and the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:25:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Lane</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/10/27/life-beyond-conversation-and-engage/comment-page-1/#comment-192222</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/10/27/life-beyond-conversation-and-engage/#comment-192222</guid>
		<description>Ha!  Nice breakdown, Jason! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha!  Nice breakdown, Jason!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Dojc</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/10/27/life-beyond-conversation-and-engage/comment-page-1/#comment-192219</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Dojc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/10/27/life-beyond-conversation-and-engage/#comment-192219</guid>
		<description>All Jargon goes through a lifecycle: 
 
Early adoption: Someone comes out with a new idea (or a brilliant re-packaging of an old idea) such as &quot;You should monitor the conversation and engage your customers)&quot; and others think, hey that sounds somewhat wacky but it could work. I mean we&#039;re living in this brave new tech world. 
 
Mass Adoption: Everyone latches onto the buzz words. We now drop &quot;conversation&quot; and &quot;engagement&quot; as a matter of course in every day speech. It makes us sound &#039;current&#039; and &#039;with it&#039; not because we are &#039;current&#039; and &#039;with it&#039; but because we fear that if we don&#039;t mention them, we won&#039;t have a chance of being &#039;current&#039; and &#039;with it&#039;.  
 
Oversaturation and slow death: The more something gets used, the less cool it becomes. Some indications that we&#039;ve reached that stage: a) Your boss, client, manager, starts asking you for a conversation strategy in the same manner as the McDonald&#039;s server asking &quot;if you want fries with that&quot; b) Your parents/grandparents tell you that you&#039;re not &quot;engaging with them enough and should call more so you can have more &quot;conversations&quot; and/or c) Blog posts like this proliferate lamenting the overuse of once cool jargon. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All Jargon goes through a lifecycle: </p>
<p>Early adoption: Someone comes out with a new idea (or a brilliant re-packaging of an old idea) such as &quot;You should monitor the conversation and engage your customers)&quot; and others think, hey that sounds somewhat wacky but it could work. I mean we&#039;re living in this brave new tech world. </p>
<p>Mass Adoption: Everyone latches onto the buzz words. We now drop &quot;conversation&quot; and &quot;engagement&quot; as a matter of course in every day speech. It makes us sound &#039;current&#039; and &#039;with it&#039; not because we are &#039;current&#039; and &#039;with it&#039; but because we fear that if we don&#039;t mention them, we won&#039;t have a chance of being &#039;current&#039; and &#039;with it&#039;.  </p>
<p>Oversaturation and slow death: The more something gets used, the less cool it becomes. Some indications that we&#039;ve reached that stage: a) Your boss, client, manager, starts asking you for a conversation strategy in the same manner as the McDonald&#039;s server asking &quot;if you want fries with that&quot; b) Your parents/grandparents tell you that you&#039;re not &quot;engaging with them enough and should call more so you can have more &quot;conversations&quot; and/or c) Blog posts like this proliferate lamenting the overuse of once cool jargon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Lane</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/10/27/life-beyond-conversation-and-engage/comment-page-1/#comment-192214</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/10/27/life-beyond-conversation-and-engage/#comment-192214</guid>
		<description>Is creating fresh vocabulary really a concern?  Completely agree that the words you&#039;re citing are beyond overused, but these sorts of terms also create a quick reference point to enable people to exchange ideas without barriers to entry into the discussion.   
As for your drinking game at conferences, you&#039;re probably right, but doesn&#039;t that speak as much to the creativity and originality of the speakers (and conference programmers&#039; reliance on &quot;the usual suspects&quot;) as it does to the need for new vocabulary? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is creating fresh vocabulary really a concern?  Completely agree that the words you&#039;re citing are beyond overused, but these sorts of terms also create a quick reference point to enable people to exchange ideas without barriers to entry into the discussion.<br />
As for your drinking game at conferences, you&#039;re probably right, but doesn&#039;t that speak as much to the creativity and originality of the speakers (and conference programmers&#039; reliance on &quot;the usual suspects&quot;) as it does to the need for new vocabulary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

