<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toronto Company Kills Word Sales</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/08/12/toronto-company-kills-word-sales/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/08/12/toronto-company-kills-word-sales/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Startups, Entrepreneurs and the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:25:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AffableAl</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/08/12/toronto-company-kills-word-sales/comment-page-1/#comment-190864</link>
		<dc:creator>AffableAl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 03:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/08/12/toronto-company-kills-word-sales/#comment-190864</guid>
		<description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/2008\/PER-xml-20080205\/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;XML spec&lt;/a&gt; says: &quot;XML was developed by an XML Working Group (originally known as the SGML Editorial Review Board) formed under the auspices of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) in &lt;b&gt;1996&lt;/b&gt;&quot;.  I was surprised to find out that patent &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/patft.uspto.gov\/netacgi\/nph-Parser\?Sect2=PTO1&amp;amp\;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;amp\;p=1&amp;amp\;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&amp;amp\;r=1&amp;amp\;f=G&amp;amp\;l=50&amp;amp\;d=PALL&amp;amp\;RefSrch=yes&amp;amp\;Query=PN%2F5787449&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;5787449&lt;/a&gt; was filed on June 2, &lt;b&gt;1994&lt;/b&gt;. The patent sounds alot like a description of XML to me.  Seems like i4i could go after alot of companies that make tools that display xml documents in formats other than plain text. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/2008\/PER-xml-20080205\/" target="_blank">XML spec</a> says: &quot;XML was developed by an XML Working Group (originally known as the SGML Editorial Review Board) formed under the auspices of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) in <b>1996</b>&quot;.  I was surprised to find out that patent <a href="http:\/\/patft.uspto.gov\/netacgi\/nph-Parser\?Sect2=PTO1&#038;amp\;Sect2=HITOFF&#038;amp\;p=1&#038;amp\;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&#038;amp\;r=1&#038;amp\;f=G&#038;amp\;l=50&#038;amp\;d=PALL&#038;amp\;RefSrch=yes&#038;amp\;Query=PN%2F5787449" target="_blank">5787449</a> was filed on June 2, <b>1994</b>. The patent sounds alot like a description of XML to me.  Seems like i4i could go after alot of companies that make tools that display xml documents in formats other than plain text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Moreno</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/08/12/toronto-company-kills-word-sales/comment-page-1/#comment-190829</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Moreno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/08/12/toronto-company-kills-word-sales/#comment-190829</guid>
		<description>Sometimes I wonder if Microsoft is the bad guy or just a victim. I thought XML is an open standard </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes I wonder if Microsoft is the bad guy or just a victim. I thought XML is an open standard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

