<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Twitter Kill Conference Q&amp;A?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/04/08/will-twitter-kill-conference-qa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/04/08/will-twitter-kill-conference-qa/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Startups, Entrepreneurs and the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:25:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: markevans</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/04/08/will-twitter-kill-conference-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-171781</link>
		<dc:creator>markevans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4645#comment-171781</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in the moderator camp. I would argue that a good moderator is as important as good panelists. Without strong moderation, a panel can lose its focus. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m in the moderator camp. I would argue that a good moderator is as important as good panelists. Without strong moderation, a panel can lose its focus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/04/08/will-twitter-kill-conference-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-171780</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4645#comment-171780</guid>
		<description>Agreeing with Trevor...to build on the point I would say that a moderator should have the ability to not just &quot;reign in&quot; participants and panelists but to actively fuel the conversation by suggesting links between comments and challenging panelists to expand on their ideas if they&#039;re not complete enough. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreeing with Trevor&#8230;to build on the point I would say that a moderator should have the ability to not just &quot;reign in&quot; participants and panelists but to actively fuel the conversation by suggesting links between comments and challenging panelists to expand on their ideas if they&#039;re not complete enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/04/08/will-twitter-kill-conference-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-171760</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4645#comment-171760</guid>
		<description>re: moderation. I had a conversation with April Dunford about how relevant the moderator was to a good session. We both agreed that they were ESSENTIAL. Why? Because the moderator, in a perfect world, has a macro, 10,000 ft. view of the subject under discussion. He or she is also experienced enough to know when to reign in both questions and panelists. This is a skill and an art and has been true at Mesh since its inception. 
 
What I do like about Twitter-based interaction is that it can act to screen  &#039;questions&#039; from people who mostly want to get up on a soapbox or tout something personal to them and irrelevant to most everyone else. 
 
  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: moderation. I had a conversation with April Dunford about how relevant the moderator was to a good session. We both agreed that they were ESSENTIAL. Why? Because the moderator, in a perfect world, has a macro, 10,000 ft. view of the subject under discussion. He or she is also experienced enough to know when to reign in both questions and panelists. This is a skill and an art and has been true at Mesh since its inception. </p>
<p>What I do like about Twitter-based interaction is that it can act to screen  &#039;questions&#039; from people who mostly want to get up on a soapbox or tout something personal to them and irrelevant to most everyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bastien</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/04/08/will-twitter-kill-conference-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-171673</link>
		<dc:creator>Bastien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4645#comment-171673</guid>
		<description>I remember that Carsonified does sometimes the same at their conferences fowa or fowd. Maybe it helps to get more question, and the moderator is able to filter useless questions. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember that Carsonified does sometimes the same at their conferences fowa or fowd. Maybe it helps to get more question, and the moderator is able to filter useless questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Dawe</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/04/08/will-twitter-kill-conference-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-171351</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Dawe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4645#comment-171351</guid>
		<description>I think people are shy and worried that they will embarrass themselves. The bigger the crowd, the more shy they become.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think people are shy and worried that they will embarrass themselves. The bigger the crowd, the more shy they become..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

