<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Cell Phones a Right?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/01/11/are-cell-phones-a-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/01/11/are-cell-phones-a-right/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jamshid</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/01/11/are-cell-phones-a-right/comment-page-1/#comment-159380</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamshid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4419#comment-159380</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not about &quot;rights&quot;, it&#039;s about a country maintaining its competitive advantage. In today&#039;s world a country cannot afford NOT to give all its kids internet access. Of course healthcare, food, etc. are more important basic necessities, but a country where only rich kids have broadband is dooming itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not about &#8220;rights&#8221;, it&#8217;s about a country maintaining its competitive advantage. In today&#8217;s world a country cannot afford NOT to give all its kids internet access. Of course healthcare, food, etc. are more important basic necessities, but a country where only rich kids have broadband is dooming itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/01/11/are-cell-phones-a-right/comment-page-1/#comment-157374</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4419#comment-157374</guid>
		<description>I think that having a cell phone is a luxury.  They were only invented 20 years ago, if human civilization could live without them for thousands of years... I&#039;m pretty sure that people can still survive without them now.  As for a home phone, I agree that everyhome should have one, mainly for emergencies for free though.  A monthly fee should still be charged for any kind of social or non-emergency type of calls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that having a cell phone is a luxury.  They were only invented 20 years ago, if human civilization could live without them for thousands of years&#8230; I&#8217;m pretty sure that people can still survive without them now.  As for a home phone, I agree that everyhome should have one, mainly for emergencies for free though.  A monthly fee should still be charged for any kind of social or non-emergency type of calls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike K.</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/01/11/are-cell-phones-a-right/comment-page-1/#comment-157137</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4419#comment-157137</guid>
		<description>No human has a right to any thing that must be created by another human. 

Rights are those actions capable of being performed by a human which all other humans are morally bound not to impede. A possible action is considered to be a right when and only when the action is never destructive in any way to the life of any other non-consenting human.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No human has a right to any thing that must be created by another human. </p>
<p>Rights are those actions capable of being performed by a human which all other humans are morally bound not to impede. A possible action is considered to be a right when and only when the action is never destructive in any way to the life of any other non-consenting human.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can We Keep Human Rights Up To Date With Technology? &#124; SheGeeks</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/01/11/are-cell-phones-a-right/comment-page-1/#comment-157135</link>
		<dc:creator>Can We Keep Human Rights Up To Date With Technology? &#124; SheGeeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4419#comment-157135</guid>
		<description>[...] discovered this article via Mark Evan’s blog where he voices his opinion on the topic. Once again, I disagree for many of the same reasons that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discovered this article via Mark Evan’s blog where he voices his opinion on the topic. Once again, I disagree for many of the same reasons that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corvida</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2009/01/11/are-cell-phones-a-right/comment-page-1/#comment-157130</link>
		<dc:creator>Corvida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4419#comment-157130</guid>
		<description>I agree with you. I don&#039;t think you&#039;re being cold hearted at all. It&#039;s a privilege. Having a cellphone for free in order to be &quot;economically engaged&quot; is a ridiculous excuse to waste money. They&#039;re still economically engaged if they have a house phone and who doesn&#039;t have one of those or at least know someone with one.

As aforementioned, there are way more important things that should be free. What&#039;s the world coming to? If there&#039;s a free cellphone before there&#039;s free health-care, something is seriously wrong with the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you. I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re being cold hearted at all. It&#8217;s a privilege. Having a cellphone for free in order to be &#8220;economically engaged&#8221; is a ridiculous excuse to waste money. They&#8217;re still economically engaged if they have a house phone and who doesn&#8217;t have one of those or at least know someone with one.</p>
<p>As aforementioned, there are way more important things that should be free. What&#8217;s the world coming to? If there&#8217;s a free cellphone before there&#8217;s free health-care, something is seriously wrong with the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
