<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Are Blog Search Engines So Bad?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/12/18/why-are-blog-search-engines-so-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/12/18/why-are-blog-search-engines-so-bad/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/12/18/why-are-blog-search-engines-so-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-159567</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4364#comment-159567</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark, 

I have to agree with both your post and the comment about Technorati. They seem to be doing a half decent job, but somehow the site just doesn&#039;t have the feel of a true market leader.. Don&#039;t know how to explain it.

Do you have an idea about what is missing or should be available to blog search? I would assume that the classic indexing approach to blog search somehow fails because it doesn&#039;t filter the actual post topics well enough.. Any ideas?

Cheers,
Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark, </p>
<p>I have to agree with both your post and the comment about Technorati. They seem to be doing a half decent job, but somehow the site just doesn&#8217;t have the feel of a true market leader.. Don&#8217;t know how to explain it.</p>
<p>Do you have an idea about what is missing or should be available to blog search? I would assume that the classic indexing approach to blog search somehow fails because it doesn&#8217;t filter the actual post topics well enough.. Any ideas?</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beau</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/12/18/why-are-blog-search-engines-so-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-156272</link>
		<dc:creator>Beau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4364#comment-156272</guid>
		<description>I agree that there is significant room for improvement when it comes to blog search tools.  I&#039;ve been involved in an effort to create a blog search capability focusing on sports blogs (&lt;a href=&quot;http://buzztap.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;buzztap.com&lt;/a&gt;).  Ultimately, I think specialized blog search engines will be able to better fill the need in areas where generalized search engines are failing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that there is significant room for improvement when it comes to blog search tools.  I&#8217;ve been involved in an effort to create a blog search capability focusing on sports blogs (<a href="http://buzztap.com" rel="nofollow">buzztap.com</a>).  Ultimately, I think specialized blog search engines will be able to better fill the need in areas where generalized search engines are failing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/12/18/why-are-blog-search-engines-so-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-152124</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4364#comment-152124</guid>
		<description>Ian,

Thanks for the comment. To be honest, Technorati&#039;s biggest challenge is convincing people that it&#039;s a service that works well to do blog searches. At one point it was the go-to service but that reputation has waned in recent years.

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment. To be honest, Technorati&#8217;s biggest challenge is convincing people that it&#8217;s a service that works well to do blog searches. At one point it was the go-to service but that reputation has waned in recent years.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Kallen</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/12/18/why-are-blog-search-engines-so-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-151814</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Kallen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4364#comment-151814</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark,
FWIW, Technorati had your post indexed within a few minutes of the ping. The spam is vastly reduced in our index and we&#039;re doing a lot of retooling that we think will help serve bloggers and their readers better.
-Ian
Technorati</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark,<br />
FWIW, Technorati had your post indexed within a few minutes of the ping. The spam is vastly reduced in our index and we&#8217;re doing a lot of retooling that we think will help serve bloggers and their readers better.<br />
-Ian<br />
Technorati</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
