<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s the Right Buyer for Twitter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/11/24/whos-the-right-buyer-for-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/11/24/whos-the-right-buyer-for-twitter/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: omar</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/11/24/whos-the-right-buyer-for-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-164128</link>
		<dc:creator>omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4286#comment-164128</guid>
		<description>Twitter did not declined the facebook deal becouse it was to low. It was declined becouse 80% was on stock and we all know about facebook shady valuation maybe 500 m in facebook stock is not 500 m in real life. I will prefer twitter to be independent if not news corp and google are my top choices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter did not declined the facebook deal becouse it was to low. It was declined becouse 80% was on stock and we all know about facebook shady valuation maybe 500 m in facebook stock is not 500 m in real life. I will prefer twitter to be independent if not news corp and google are my top choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/11/24/whos-the-right-buyer-for-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-140851</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4286#comment-140851</guid>
		<description>Facebook has enough similarity to Twitter with the status updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook has enough similarity to Twitter with the status updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Stubblebine</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/11/24/whos-the-right-buyer-for-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-140452</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Stubblebine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4286#comment-140452</guid>
		<description>Comcast. Twitter could keep being Twitter, but the data could be fed back into targeted advertising on both web and cable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comcast. Twitter could keep being Twitter, but the data could be fed back into targeted advertising on both web and cable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Should Buy Twitter? &#124; Twitterrati</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/11/24/whos-the-right-buyer-for-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-140045</link>
		<dc:creator>Who Should Buy Twitter? &#124; Twitterrati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4286#comment-140045</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter, it does beg the question if it&#8217;s not Facebook, then who should buy Twitter. On my &#8220;other&#8221; blog, I dig into it a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter, it does beg the question if it&#8217;s not Facebook, then who should buy Twitter. On my &#8220;other&#8221; blog, I dig into it a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/11/24/whos-the-right-buyer-for-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-140032</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4286#comment-140032</guid>
		<description>Considering that, years later, MySpace is still plagued with errors and a painful interface, NewsCorp should be avoided at all costs, IMO.  I can see Facebook, though, that makes sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering that, years later, MySpace is still plagued with errors and a painful interface, NewsCorp should be avoided at all costs, IMO.  I can see Facebook, though, that makes sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/11/24/whos-the-right-buyer-for-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-140016</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4286#comment-140016</guid>
		<description>Call me crazy, but $500 million sure does sound like a lot of money, especially considering the current economic climate. Twitter has a fraction of # of users compared to MySpace in 2005 for the same price. 

@Twitter: Sell, sell, sell!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me crazy, but $500 million sure does sound like a lot of money, especially considering the current economic climate. Twitter has a fraction of # of users compared to MySpace in 2005 for the same price. </p>
<p>@Twitter: Sell, sell, sell!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/11/24/whos-the-right-buyer-for-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-139955</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4286#comment-139955</guid>
		<description>Rob,

It should be fascinating to see what bidders emerge. We may be surprised...or Facebook will simply increase its offer to deal with any valuation concerns Twitter may have. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob,</p>
<p>It should be fascinating to see what bidders emerge. We may be surprised&#8230;or Facebook will simply increase its offer to deal with any valuation concerns Twitter may have. <img src='http://www.markevanstech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Diana</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/11/24/whos-the-right-buyer-for-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-139954</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=4286#comment-139954</guid>
		<description>Personally, I like the News Corp idea as they could eventually integrate Twitter with MySpace. I thought about major newspapers like NYT, but I just don&#039;t think they can afford them. I also struggle trying to find benefits for the newspapers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I like the News Corp idea as they could eventually integrate Twitter with MySpace. I thought about major newspapers like NYT, but I just don&#8217;t think they can afford them. I also struggle trying to find benefits for the newspapers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
