<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tumbling off the Apple Cart?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/29/tumbling-off-the-apple-cart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/29/tumbling-off-the-apple-cart/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vava</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/29/tumbling-off-the-apple-cart/comment-page-1/#comment-112793</link>
		<dc:creator>Vava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3993#comment-112793</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know... Macs are like Starbucks lattes - a big part of their attractiveness is the price. Premium price equals premuim product, or so we are lead to believe. The problem is that Starbucks is projecting sliding sales because in tougher economic times people are less likely to pay $2.50 for a coffee, so why would they choose a $1500 entry level Mac when a PC version can be had for half the price? I understand my argument ignores the OS debates and all, but I&#039;d be hard pressed to pay double for something that MAY work better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know&#8230; Macs are like Starbucks lattes &#8211; a big part of their attractiveness is the price. Premium price equals premuim product, or so we are lead to believe. The problem is that Starbucks is projecting sliding sales because in tougher economic times people are less likely to pay $2.50 for a coffee, so why would they choose a $1500 entry level Mac when a PC version can be had for half the price? I understand my argument ignores the OS debates and all, but I&#8217;d be hard pressed to pay double for something that MAY work better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
