<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chrome May Be Shiny &#038; New But&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/03/chrome-may-be-shiny-new-but/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/03/chrome-may-be-shiny-new-but/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Buzzlair Voufincci</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/03/chrome-may-be-shiny-new-but/comment-page-1/#comment-123190</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzzlair Voufincci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3846#comment-123190</guid>
		<description>I heard about Chrome. I love google, but never have intention to try Chrome. Same as u, im a Firefox hu ha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard about Chrome. I love google, but never have intention to try Chrome. Same as u, im a Firefox hu ha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathon Chase</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/03/chrome-may-be-shiny-new-but/comment-page-1/#comment-104763</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon Chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3846#comment-104763</guid>
		<description>Google Chrome is impressively fast, but doesn't support the Active X or Java I need to use LogMeIn.com and access my home computer, bringing me right back to Firefox 3.0 again. I have the same problem with the 1601 error on my desktop running WinXP Pro w/SP3, but no problems installing it on my laptop with Vista Home Premium w/SP1.

Complete agree with what you said Mark. Go with what you know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Chrome is impressively fast, but doesn&#8217;t support the Active X or Java I need to use LogMeIn.com and access my home computer, bringing me right back to Firefox 3.0 again. I have the same problem with the 1601 error on my desktop running WinXP Pro w/SP3, but no problems installing it on my laptop with Vista Home Premium w/SP1.</p>
<p>Complete agree with what you said Mark. Go with what you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Toms</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/03/chrome-may-be-shiny-new-but/comment-page-1/#comment-101161</link>
		<dc:creator>George Toms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3846#comment-101161</guid>
		<description>Google Chrome is really fast!
Now I can sort 200,000 records inside of Browser (Chrome) just in 1 sec. (Faster than Microsoft Excel):
http://www.ardentedge.com/ex_if.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Chrome is really fast!<br />
Now I can sort 200,000 records inside of Browser (Chrome) just in 1 sec. (Faster than Microsoft Excel):<br />
<a href="http://www.ardentedge.com/ex_if.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ardentedge.com/ex_if.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Schmitt</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/03/chrome-may-be-shiny-new-but/comment-page-1/#comment-101158</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Schmitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3846#comment-101158</guid>
		<description>I think what Google has done is actually pretty impressive.  I installed it and worked great right out of the gate.  And they tell a really good story with their multi-process architecture. Seems like the way for browsers to go... 

But am I going to switch?  I don't really see the need right now.  Why go to the trouble? Firefox works great.

Google has to prove why their design and architecture is the best (in real life, not just in a comic book) and that people running web-based apps can't live without it.  If they can do that then I'll be one of the first to switch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what Google has done is actually pretty impressive.  I installed it and worked great right out of the gate.  And they tell a really good story with their multi-process architecture. Seems like the way for browsers to go&#8230; </p>
<p>But am I going to switch?  I don&#8217;t really see the need right now.  Why go to the trouble? Firefox works great.</p>
<p>Google has to prove why their design and architecture is the best (in real life, not just in a comic book) and that people running web-based apps can&#8217;t live without it.  If they can do that then I&#8217;ll be one of the first to switch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PRJack</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/03/chrome-may-be-shiny-new-but/comment-page-1/#comment-101127</link>
		<dc:creator>PRJack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3846#comment-101127</guid>
		<description>on a different facet... how different is the launch of Chrome with the launch of cuil.com? The latter over promised and took pot-shots at competitors. The former admitted it may have some flaws (hey, it's a BETA version, right?) but didn't over promise anything. I can tell you who scored bigger from a Marketing Communications standpoint, that's for sure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on a different facet&#8230; how different is the launch of Chrome with the launch of cuil.com? The latter over promised and took pot-shots at competitors. The former admitted it may have some flaws (hey, it&#8217;s a BETA version, right?) but didn&#8217;t over promise anything. I can tell you who scored bigger from a Marketing Communications standpoint, that&#8217;s for sure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suresh</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/03/chrome-may-be-shiny-new-but/comment-page-1/#comment-100968</link>
		<dc:creator>suresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3846#comment-100968</guid>
		<description>Well i installed crome.

It has some good features like getting automatic speed dial like opera and appeal is also good.

I do use fire fox also and give a try for crome also now and then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well i installed crome.</p>
<p>It has some good features like getting automatic speed dial like opera and appeal is also good.</p>
<p>I do use fire fox also and give a try for crome also now and then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/03/chrome-may-be-shiny-new-but/comment-page-1/#comment-100922</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3846#comment-100922</guid>
		<description>Steve,

Having not used Chrome yet, I can't fully appreciate some of the nuances you talk about in your post. But as someone who has a lot of tabs going - some applications, some content - all day long, I definitely like the idea of them operating with some sense of independence. Now, if I could fix my Windows Installer 1601 error, I'd be good to go.

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>Having not used Chrome yet, I can&#8217;t fully appreciate some of the nuances you talk about in your post. But as someone who has a lot of tabs going - some applications, some content - all day long, I definitely like the idea of them operating with some sense of independence. Now, if I could fix my Windows Installer 1601 error, I&#8217;d be good to go.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.markevanstech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Hodson</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/03/chrome-may-be-shiny-new-but/comment-page-1/#comment-100915</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hodson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 23:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3846#comment-100915</guid>
		<description>and once people get past the fact that it's a browser (yawn) they might start seeing that this is more about changing work flows and the desktop. I wrote about this aspect of it yesterday while I was playing around with Chrome and the more I work with it the more I stand by what I wrote

http://www.winextra.com/2008/09/02/thanks-google-now-im-going-to-hell/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and once people get past the fact that it&#8217;s a browser (yawn) they might start seeing that this is more about changing work flows and the desktop. I wrote about this aspect of it yesterday while I was playing around with Chrome and the more I work with it the more I stand by what I wrote</p>
<p><a href="http://www.winextra.com/2008/09/02/thanks-google-now-im-going-to-hell/" rel="nofollow">http://www.winextra.com/2008/09/02/thanks-google-now-im-going-to-hell/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
