<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next, Google Should Buy Wordpress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/02/next-google-should-buy-wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/02/next-google-should-buy-wordpress/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alice Verheij</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/02/next-google-should-buy-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-113141</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice Verheij</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3828#comment-113141</guid>
		<description>Dear all,

If ever (!) Google would acquire WordPress I shall be the first to dump Wordpress. Google works for me for mail and maps and services like that. But my writing spot is to dear to me to hand it over into the arms of a company like Google. They behave themselves on the net like the banks did in the financial industry. In the end even Google will experience a downfall resulting from a lack of moral.

If indeed it might ever happen I will kickstart my own blogging server in stead, granting me independancy as a writer.

WordPress will stay open source, I sincerely hope.
And Google's browser is not interesting for me anyway as I prefer Mac's and - again - Google is slow in supporting OSX as a OS platform. 

Last but not least of all I am not interested in a service connected to a simple browser like Chrome where I have a wonderful open source browser platform in FireFox.

Regards,
Alice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear all,</p>
<p>If ever (!) Google would acquire WordPress I shall be the first to dump Wordpress. Google works for me for mail and maps and services like that. But my writing spot is to dear to me to hand it over into the arms of a company like Google. They behave themselves on the net like the banks did in the financial industry. In the end even Google will experience a downfall resulting from a lack of moral.</p>
<p>If indeed it might ever happen I will kickstart my own blogging server in stead, granting me independancy as a writer.</p>
<p>WordPress will stay open source, I sincerely hope.<br />
And Google&#8217;s browser is not interesting for me anyway as I prefer Mac&#8217;s and - again - Google is slow in supporting OSX as a OS platform. </p>
<p>Last but not least of all I am not interested in a service connected to a simple browser like Chrome where I have a wonderful open source browser platform in FireFox.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Alice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10: Posts on WordPress &#171; Top Tenner</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/02/next-google-should-buy-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-101478</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10: Posts on WordPress &#171; Top Tenner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3828#comment-101478</guid>
		<description>[...] Google should buy WordPress [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google should buy WordPress [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Rosen</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/02/next-google-should-buy-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-100823</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Rosen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3828#comment-100823</guid>
		<description>How would buying WordPress be resolved with Google owning Blogger? It would be a two-way strategy - although perhaps that makes sense given that I'm still confused by Google launching Chrome just days after announcing their continued support of Mozilla Firefox.

Looks like someone likes to hedge their bets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would buying WordPress be resolved with Google owning Blogger? It would be a two-way strategy - although perhaps that makes sense given that I&#8217;m still confused by Google launching Chrome just days after announcing their continued support of Mozilla Firefox.</p>
<p>Looks like someone likes to hedge their bets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Chrome at Impactante locución latina</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/02/next-google-should-buy-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-100686</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Chrome at Impactante locución latina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3828#comment-100686</guid>
		<description>[...] el nuevo navegador de Google, &#8220;Chrome&#8221;, me entero de que ahora prentende comprar Wordpress&#8230;uhmm&#8230;aquí huele a monopolio y yo no he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] el nuevo navegador de Google, &#8220;Chrome&#8221;, me entero de que ahora prentende comprar Wordpress&#8230;uhmm&#8230;aquí huele a monopolio y yo no he [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google detrás de wordpress, recursos educativos open source, nómadas digitales, guerra navegadores, etc&#8230; &#124; El caparazón</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/02/next-google-should-buy-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-100635</link>
		<dc:creator>Google detrás de wordpress, recursos educativos open source, nómadas digitales, guerra navegadores, etc&#8230; &#124; El caparazón</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3828#comment-100635</guid>
		<description>[...] Google podría estar pensando en comprar también Wordpress: Tras Chrome en el mercado de los navegadores, Wordpress, en el de los blogs autoalojados. La potencia de la compañía es realmente excepcional y nos dirige hacia un monopolio que hace muy poco sólo imaginábamos&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google podría estar pensando en comprar también Wordpress: Tras Chrome en el mercado de los navegadores, Wordpress, en el de los blogs autoalojados. La potencia de la compañía es realmente excepcional y nos dirige hacia un monopolio que hace muy poco sólo imaginábamos&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuvi</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/02/next-google-should-buy-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-100596</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuvi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3828#comment-100596</guid>
		<description>+1 Aaron. I like my wordpress working and not-behind-iron-curtains thank-you-very-much</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 Aaron. I like my wordpress working and not-behind-iron-curtains thank-you-very-much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suresh</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/02/next-google-should-buy-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-100583</link>
		<dc:creator>suresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3828#comment-100583</guid>
		<description>Looking like a good idea.
Any way blog spot is also a good platform .
The flexibility it offers in editing the code is not offered by word press.
Free word press blog can not have third party ads like google.

Google has to integrate the good features of word press in blog spot( in fact it is trying to do so like giving option of comment form with blogspot draft...) and make it more attractive.

Two different platforms with one owner may effect the precepts of any one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking like a good idea.<br />
Any way blog spot is also a good platform .<br />
The flexibility it offers in editing the code is not offered by word press.<br />
Free word press blog can not have third party ads like google.</p>
<p>Google has to integrate the good features of word press in blog spot( in fact it is trying to do so like giving option of comment form with blogspot draft&#8230;) and make it more attractive.</p>
<p>Two different platforms with one owner may effect the precepts of any one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/02/next-google-should-buy-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-100550</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3828#comment-100550</guid>
		<description>Mark,

acquiring WP would certainly (in my eyes) give Google a better blogging platform but not a bigger on. Check out the disparity between blogger.com and wordpress.com on Alexa (not conclusive but certainly illustrative).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>acquiring WP would certainly (in my eyes) give Google a better blogging platform but not a bigger on. Check out the disparity between blogger.com and wordpress.com on Alexa (not conclusive but certainly illustrative).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Blog Platform</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/02/next-google-should-buy-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-100531</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Blog Platform</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3828#comment-100531</guid>
		<description>[...] Evans suggested this morning that Google buy WordPress.com for name recognition and platform familiarity. The idea is to bolster the suite of services that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Evans suggested this morning that Google buy WordPress.com for name recognition and platform familiarity. The idea is to bolster the suite of services that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Brazell</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/09/02/next-google-should-buy-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-100515</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Brazell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3828#comment-100515</guid>
		<description>I think it's just as likely that Google could start their own WordPress powered blogging platform. Of course, there would be internal conflict with Blogger, but then there's no reason that a WordPress powered blog platform could not be the replacement for Blogger.

At the end of the day, the real selling point between Blogger and WordPress.com, as free blog hosting competitors, is the management issue. WordPress.com gets high marks on the anti-splog front. Engineers could replicate the Blogger domain hosting as WP.com has. Engineers could counnter the WP.com restrictions around javascript by allowing javascript as they do on Blogger.

No reason why Google couldn't use the WP open source platform to transform their crappy Blogger service if they wanted to.

That would, of course, pour loads of resources into the development of the software, something those of us in the WP community would welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s just as likely that Google could start their own WordPress powered blogging platform. Of course, there would be internal conflict with Blogger, but then there&#8217;s no reason that a WordPress powered blog platform could not be the replacement for Blogger.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, the real selling point between Blogger and WordPress.com, as free blog hosting competitors, is the management issue. WordPress.com gets high marks on the anti-splog front. Engineers could replicate the Blogger domain hosting as WP.com has. Engineers could counnter the WP.com restrictions around javascript by allowing javascript as they do on Blogger.</p>
<p>No reason why Google couldn&#8217;t use the WP open source platform to transform their crappy Blogger service if they wanted to.</p>
<p>That would, of course, pour loads of resources into the development of the software, something those of us in the WP community would welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
