After pining for an iPod Touch for months, I finally pulled the trigger recently – and now wonder why I waited so long.
In short, the Touch is sublime. It is a wonderfully designed and multi-functional product that probably doesn’t get the attention it deserves because of the obsession with the iPhone. Sure, it doesn’t have a phone or camera but Wi-Fi connectivity and ever-growing bounty of applications makes the Touch an interesting and useful device.
Since getting the Touch a couple of weeks ago, I’ve not only rediscovered my digital music collection but spent a lot of time on iTunes App Store downloading applications (mostly free ones) – everything from travel and food apps (Hotels.com, UrbanSpoon, BlackBook Guides and What the Locals Like) to utilities (Zenbe – a list-making app) and social media services (Wordpress, Twitterific). Using the iTunes store, you can customize the Touch or iPhone to meet your personal or professional interests.
As for why I decided to buy a Touch rather than an iPhone, it came down to economics. Buying the Touch meant a one-time cost while getting an iPhone from Rogers meant locking into a three-year contract that would have cost $1,080 just for data. It wasn’t something I could justify. CBC suggests the three-year contract is the second most expensive in the world.
While I don’t pine for always-on access to the Web, it would be nice if the Touch had a camera and the ability to use VoIP. You could easily see a company such as Belkin make a camera peripheral that would plug into the Touch’s input jack or the dock connector, while VoIP seems like a remote possibility so Apple doesn’t piss of the carriers. (Check out petitinvention what an iPod Touch camera would look like.)
As well, Kevin Purdy makes a strong case for the Touch vs. the iPhone with a post entitled “Forget the iPhone–The iPod Touch is Good Enough”.
Before signing off, this is the first in a series of posts this week about the wireless Web. My thesis is while the iPhone and other smartphones such as the Blackberry Bold are amazing devices, they are not going to have as much of an impact on the mobile economy than most people think.
Technorati Tags: Apple, iPhone, iPod Touch
14 Comments
Re VoIP- iPod Touch would also need a mic.
Jim,
I wonder if there would be someway to re-engineer the input jack with a software update. Probably unlikely, I guess.
While I don’t pine for always-on access to the Web, it would be nice if the Touch had a camera and the ability to use VoIP.
Agreed. If the iPod Touch offered VoIP, I’d be in line to buy one right now…
I’m in the same boat. I got a touch a few weeks ago with the same idea you had: check out the wifi and the apps. It’s too light an storage to replace my 60g iPod. Funny, with it’s seamless integration of Microsoft outlook through the webmail feature, I’m now looking more seriously at getting an iPhone.
Another point is Belkin made a device for recording on a regular iPod called a tunetalk. I’d imagine it wouldn’t be unreasonable for them to make a mix and software to turn the touch into a voip phone.
Is there such a product as the “iPhone Touch”? I thought it was just called iPhone?
I think you’ve a typo epidemic going, being that the intro sentence leads with “pining for an iPhone Touch”, as does the URL and title of the first link…
I’m going to get one of these “free” with a laptop purchase and use it to start developing iPhone/Touch apps. I’m pretty excited and look forward to using it.
Shumizzle,
My bad – just edited first sentence to read iPod Touch.
Steve Romej: That’s what I did; spent the extra $100 to upgrade to the 16GB model.
Someone did make a mic for the touch. TUAW had it on their site like 6 months ago.
I’d disagree. To me, the reason I’m so excited about my recently purchased iPhone is precisely that I never have to worry about finding wi-fi – whether I’m on the bus, walking down the street or in a store (like the LCBO, where I can look at wines I’ve noted down in Evernote) I’m always connected. The point, to me anyway, is that I have constant access not only to ‘the Web’ but to all my information floating around in the cloud. I think the Touch is great but I don’t think that wi-fi can replace the ubiquity of cellular coverage.
Still, I’m interested to hear your thoughts on why mobile is being over-hyped.
I agree with Nav. That is why I want an iPhone (but will wait for one with a better camera and more storage).
@ Mark McKay: I think this what you saw on TUAW: http://touchmods.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/scope-with-line-in/
actually, you can ‘jailbreak’ your iTouch and get Skype or another VOIP solution working, and YES, there’s also a microphone hack. actually, there’s more than one. Google is your friend. one place to start is touchmods.wordpress.com, but there are other sites with alternate solutions and details. did Apple really think that someone – or several someone’s – wouldn’t find a way to soup up the Touch?
I wonder why you waited so long too…since the iPod touch got updated today!
Jay,
I guess I should have waited. Then, I could have taken advantage of the student discount and got a newer iPod.
Mark
4 Trackbacks
[...] iPod Touch is great, but… Blogger Mark Evans describes why he opted for an iPod Touch rather than an outright iPhone. [...]
[...] Next on this week’s wireless agenda is a hard look at the projections for mobile advertising and entertainment. Part one of this wireless series was yesterday’s look at “sublime” iPod Touch. [...]
[...] The good news was that Apple was running a student promotion in which you received a free iPod if you purchased a new MacBook. Since my wife is a student, she was kind enough to “buy” the MacBook for me so I could get the new the iPod Touch, which I had was salivating over for months. [...]
[...] Evans acquired an iPod Touch back in August after deciding he did not need an iPhone; as a result of his recent employment status change, he is [...]