<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trying to Get the Genie Back in the Bottle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/06/24/trying-to-get-the-genie-back-in-the-bottle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/06/24/trying-to-get-the-genie-back-in-the-bottle/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Saatchi &#38; Saatchi Promise JC Penny the Impossible &#171; MyMediaMusings</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/06/24/trying-to-get-the-genie-back-in-the-bottle/#comment-73903</link>
		<dc:creator>Saatchi &#38; Saatchi Promise JC Penny the Impossible &#171; MyMediaMusings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3534#comment-73903</guid>
		<description>[...] Trying to Get the Genie Back in the Bottle [via Zemanta] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Trying to Get the Genie Back in the Bottle [via Zemanta] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/06/24/trying-to-get-the-genie-back-in-the-bottle/#comment-73886</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3534#comment-73886</guid>
		<description>@ Larry. Yeah, I think Mike Masnick makes a great point. It's the "Methinks the lady doth protest too much" approach to marketing.

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Larry. Yeah, I think Mike Masnick makes a great point. It&#8217;s the &#8220;Methinks the lady doth protest too much&#8221; approach to marketing.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.markevanstech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JcPenney Removes Racy Ad &#8216;Speed Dressing&#8217; From Youtube &#171; Social Media Meanderings</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/06/24/trying-to-get-the-genie-back-in-the-bottle/#comment-73764</link>
		<dc:creator>JcPenney Removes Racy Ad &#8216;Speed Dressing&#8217; From Youtube &#171; Social Media Meanderings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3534#comment-73764</guid>
		<description>[...] Trying to Get the Genie Back in the Bottle [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Trying to Get the Genie Back in the Bottle [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Borsato</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/06/24/trying-to-get-the-genie-back-in-the-bottle/#comment-73666</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Borsato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3534#comment-73666</guid>
		<description>You might want to read Techdirt's take on this - http://techdirt.com/articles/20080624/1504301500.shtml. Perhaps this is all about generating more PR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to read Techdirt&#8217;s take on this - <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080624/1504301500.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://techdirt.com/articles/20080624/1504301500.shtml</a>. Perhaps this is all about generating more PR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dean collins</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/06/24/trying-to-get-the-genie-back-in-the-bottle/#comment-73555</link>
		<dc:creator>dean collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3534#comment-73555</guid>
		<description>I think the commercial is fantastic.

It's a shame they made it for such a staid company like JC Penny.

If a client wants to 'sue' their vendor then the client needs to take responsibility for vendor selection as JC Penny obviously made the wrong choice in partners.

Pesonally I think the reason why JC Penny is finding fault with this advertisement is exactly whats wrong with the JC Penny brand - old foggeys who dont have a clue.

Listen to your marketing consultants....this is exactly what the brand needs.

Cheers,
Dean Collins
www.Cognation.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the commercial is fantastic.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame they made it for such a staid company like JC Penny.</p>
<p>If a client wants to &#8217;sue&#8217; their vendor then the client needs to take responsibility for vendor selection as JC Penny obviously made the wrong choice in partners.</p>
<p>Pesonally I think the reason why JC Penny is finding fault with this advertisement is exactly whats wrong with the JC Penny brand - old foggeys who dont have a clue.</p>
<p>Listen to your marketing consultants&#8230;.this is exactly what the brand needs.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Dean Collins<br />
<a href="http://www.Cognation.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.Cognation.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/06/24/trying-to-get-the-genie-back-in-the-bottle/#comment-73506</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3534#comment-73506</guid>
		<description>Well, they're real but apparently produced and released without permission by a firm that works for Saatchi. So, they're really unauthorized. The "fake" part is that they people think they're real...if that makes sense.

:)

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, they&#8217;re real but apparently produced and released without permission by a firm that works for Saatchi. So, they&#8217;re really unauthorized. The &#8220;fake&#8221; part is that they people think they&#8217;re real&#8230;if that makes sense.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.markevanstech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/06/24/trying-to-get-the-genie-back-in-the-bottle/#comment-73366</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3534#comment-73366</guid>
		<description>Mark, what do you mean "fake" ad? Was it created by Saatchi? If so, was it not meant to be made public? Or was it not created by Saatchi but intended to look like a real J.C. Penney ad?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, what do you mean &#8220;fake&#8221; ad? Was it created by Saatchi? If so, was it not meant to be made public? Or was it not created by Saatchi but intended to look like a real J.C. Penney ad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael O'Connor Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/06/24/trying-to-get-the-genie-back-in-the-bottle/#comment-73350</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael O'Connor Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3534#comment-73350</guid>
		<description>It's almost too obvious a point to make (almost, but not quite - at least not for yours truly, Captain Obvious himself) - but just imagine how much cooler their staid, dusty old brand would seem in the eyes of affluent teenagers throughout the US if they embraced this instead of trying to slap it down.

Brand credibility fail!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s almost too obvious a point to make (almost, but not quite - at least not for yours truly, Captain Obvious himself) - but just imagine how much cooler their staid, dusty old brand would seem in the eyes of affluent teenagers throughout the US if they embraced this instead of trying to slap it down.</p>
<p>Brand credibility fail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
