<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Browser Renaissance?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/05/26/a-browser-renaissance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/05/26/a-browser-renaissance/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:09:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Web Browser Wars : The Blog Herald</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/05/26/a-browser-renaissance/comment-page-1/#comment-64474</link>
		<dc:creator>The Web Browser Wars : The Blog Herald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 08:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3444#comment-64474</guid>
		<description>[...] Flock took money, $15 million, and it doesn&#8217;t surprise me one bit. As Mark Evans notes, there&#8217;s a lot of potential money in social networks in the future, but the immediate money [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Flock took money, $15 million, and it doesn&#8217;t surprise me one bit. As Mark Evans notes, there&#8217;s a lot of potential money in social networks in the future, but the immediate money [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Gibbons</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/05/26/a-browser-renaissance/comment-page-1/#comment-64319</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 15:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/?p=3444#comment-64319</guid>
		<description>The revenue models that emerge in the new browser wars will be interesting. Firefox&#039;s model (in which almost all of their revenue derives from the search deal with Google) is interesting, but while $50 million is a lot for Mozilla corp., it is hardly enough to go around if the market gets crowded.

I&#039;m not saying that it won&#039;t be possible to create many other streams of revenue around the browser, and I agree with Cheng&#039;s point about the strategic value of being a gateway to countless sites and services -- but any thoughts on where else the revenue might come from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The revenue models that emerge in the new browser wars will be interesting. Firefox&#8217;s model (in which almost all of their revenue derives from the search deal with Google) is interesting, but while $50 million is a lot for Mozilla corp., it is hardly enough to go around if the market gets crowded.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that it won&#8217;t be possible to create many other streams of revenue around the browser, and I agree with Cheng&#8217;s point about the strategic value of being a gateway to countless sites and services &#8212; but any thoughts on where else the revenue might come from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
