Net Neutrality Finally Rears Ugly Head in Canada

Netneutrality
At one time, Canada was among the world leaders in Internet access, ranking second beyond South Korea in broadband penetration.

Those days now seem like a distance memory as Canada moves ever closer to becoming a second-tier online country that discourages innovation.

Case in point is network neutrality, a debate that has raged in the U.S. but has been ignored or shoved under the carpet by the federal government and regulators in Canada. Either no wants to discuss net neutrality or it’s ignored. Meanwhile, the two largest ISPs in Canada – Bell and Rogers – are openly throttling and shaping broadband traffic all in the name of “managing” their networks.

Canada’s Industry Minister, Jim Prentice, said recently he would prefer to see consumers deal with their complaints against Bell and Rogers as opposed to the federal government getting involved. That’s inspiring leadership given the Internet has not only become a quasi-public utility but a key pillar for innovation and economic development.

Meanwhile, Rogers, Bell, Telus and other broadband providers are racking up bigger profits while hiking prices and treating bandwidth as a scare resource by shaping/throttling traffic and introducing bandwidth caps. In other words, they’re creating artificial scarcity – something Mike Masnick could explain better than I.

What’s particularly sad and ironic about the federal government’s approach to Net Neutrality are two key developments:

1. In 2005, Rogers and Bell were allowed to purchase Inukshuk – a nation-wide wireless broadband network. By approving the deal, the federal government removed the possibility for consumers to have more competition and choice. Ironically, the federal government is currently trying to introduce competition and choice in the wireless market after letting the fourth national carrier, Microcell, be acquired by the leading carrier, Rogers, in 2004.

2. The CRTC, the federal telecom and media regulator, recently said it will start to explore the idea of regulating the Internet (Ha!) after deciding in 1999 that it was not going to regulate the Internet. If you want to encourage innovation, economic growth and productivity, regulating the Internet is a joke unless your goal is to create bureaucracy, policy and opportunities for lobbyists.

For all the talk about the federal government encouraging the technology sector, the sad truth is it isn’t doesn’t truly walk the walk when it comes to encouraging innovation.

More: The government and Mr. Prentice may have to acknowledge the Net Neutrality issue sooner rather than later in the wake of the NDP MP Charlie Angus (a former rock musician) introducing a private members bill, C-552, earlier this week that would:

“prohibit network operators from engaging in network management practices that favour, degrade or prioritize any content, application or service transmitted over a broadband network based on its source, ownership or destination, subject to certain exceptions.”

As well, there was a public rally earlier this week on Parliament Hill in Ottawa. You can learn more about how to support Net Neutrality at SaveOurNet.

Technorati Tags: , ,

How Do You Hire Better and Smarter?

During the mesh conference last week, it was exciting to be the emcee for 15 Minutes of Fame – where three entrepreneurs each day get five minutes to talk about what their startups are doing and why they’ll be successful.

With only five minutes to present, their focus was spent on the product/service they were developing. If they had more time, I suspect it would they all would have talked about the importance of building good teams and hiring the right people. As Wufoo.com’s Kevin Hale succinctly said during his presentation at meshU, “if you have a bad team, you’ll have a bad product”.

What makes the hiring landscape interesting – particularly in Toronto and perhaps elsewhere – is the strong demand for talent. At mesh, we installed three blank whiteboard with four words on them “Jobs Needed” and “Jobs Wanted”. By the end of mesh, all three whiteboards were full of companies looking for people.

The need for people is just one half of the hiring equation. It’s easy to ask, the more difficult part is making sure you actually hire the right people. This is where it gets challenging and complicated, particularly for start-ups that need to hire the right person at the right time if they want to be successful.

The challenge is how you do it. The most common way is you advertise a position or ask friends and colleagues for referrals. The resumes flow in, you pick the ones that look interesting, and arrange for interviews. Then, you interview candidates maybe once or twice for an hour before you making a hiring decision.

Think about it: you’ve got a key position to fill, and you’ve maybe invested three hours from start to finish. If you’re lucky or have a knack for finding the right people, the person you hire really works out or works out well enough so your company can move forward.

But is there there a better and/or smarter way to hire people? Are there ways that you can improve your chances of hiring the right person? Is it just a matter of doing more interviews so you’re really comfortable before pulling the trigger? Or are there other ways?

A friend of mine, Ben Baldwin, may have another way. He runs a company called Careerious, which recently launched a new online job matching service that uses personality, experience and education to help predict hiring success. It’s a fascinating process that I’ll get into with Ben in the near future but it is definitely worth checking out if you want more than just the same-old, same-old hiring process.

The inspiration for this post is a speech given recently by New Yorker writer Malcolm Gladwell, who talked about the disconnect in the hiring process. His thesis is that the hiring criteria for many positions is disconnected with the actual skills needed to do a particular job well. He talks about, for example, why policemen are hired because they are big and burly when the skills they really need do not necessarily requirement brute force but negotiating and diplomatic skills.

It’s great food for thought given the importance of making the right hires. While hiring can never become a science with precise and expected results, there are tools and techniques out there to improve the chances of a successful hire – something all companies, especially start-ups, should think more about.

Some Geek Goodness

Picture 2-42
Here’s a shout out to the Little Geeks Foundation, philanthropic organization that collects, refurbishes and re-distributes donated free home computers (and Internet access) to underprivileged children in Toronto

For those of wondering whether to buy a new MacBook or MacBook Pro or whether Vista is worth the investment, Little Geeks provides some healthy and much-need perspective.

On June 12, Little Geeks will be holding an event where it will be giving refurbished computers – complete with XP and Office – to 100 families.

Here are the details:

St Andrew’s United Church, 117 Bloor Street E., Toronto
3 p.m. to 7 p.m.

If you have a child who needs computer or want to learn more about what Little Geeks is doing, visit the Little Geeks Web site.

Technorati Tags:

Breaking Out Blogger “Pay”

Fred Wilson sparked a nice conversation about how many bloggers get “paid” when people leaving comments, and how this payment system is breaking down as blog content and comments becomes splattered over the Web through services such as Friendster and Shyftr.

While the idea of “blogger” and “getting paid” are an oxymoron to the vast majority of bloggers, Fred does put the spotlight on how bloggers are compensated for pounding away day after day.

1. Advertising: If you’re lucky (like Fred) and get enough traffic, you’ll get to run advertising other than AdSense, and maybe generate enough revenue to treat yourself to a nice dinner every so often. For 99% of bloggers, AdSense is it so, for example, your blog gets 1,000 page views/day, you’re looking at about $30/month in revenue, although it could be higher if you’re in a niche such as digital cameras.

2. Comments: If you’re not into blogging for the money, comments are the reward. There’s nothing more disheartening to write something brilliant and/or provocative, but have no one comment while some off-the-cuff post written by Robert Scoble is pounded with comments.

As Fred points out, comments are happening in many places other than blogs so bloggers aren’t aware of comments being made. As well, comments are becoming more difficult to attract because the comment-erati (aka people who leave comments) are being wooed by Friendfeed, Twitter, etc.

3. Tips: In theory, a good concept based on the idea that if someone likes your blog, they will tip you. Reality: it doesn’t work. Tipjoy, which offers a tip widget, has attracted 7736 tips worth a whopping $2683.51 for bloggers since February – or less than $25/day.

4. Branding and profile: Like those Mastercard commercials, it’s hard to place a value on a blog that raises your profile and personal brand.

For more, check out Steve Hodson, who suggests that WordPress should acquired Disqus, which is attracting a growing number of bloggers with its comment service. A WordPress-Disqus deal makes sense given WordPress has lots of cash to make acquisitions, and Disqus is a cool service with, to date, no business plan. For more on Disqus, check out this Q&A that I did with co-founder Daniel Ha. Stowe Boyd also offers some good insight on Fred’s post.

More: For more thoughts on comment copyright, check out Hank Williams.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Leapin’ Leopards: Another Update

Leopard-1
It’s only been seven months since Leopard leapt onto the scene but Apple’s now on its third major update with the release of OSX 10.5.3 (Note: There really should be names associated with these updates to give them some more marketing appeal because 10.5.3 does nothing to capture the imagination!)

Coming in at a whopping 450 420MB, 10.5.3 fixes a whole bunch of things (MacWorld reports that it’s precisely 70) that will surely make your Mac running better, faster, smarter and even better than Vista – or something like that. It does make you wonder, however, why there’s been three major upgrades for a product that was in development for four years.

Yeah, I know operating systems are complex beasts and software development always involves bugs but this is Apple we’re talking about – the king of design, ease-of-use, etcetera.

In any event, it is interesting to see how Apple updates are received differently than Windows updates. With Apple, most people say, “Cool, a Leopard update and proceed to download it right away”. With Windows, there’s a lot more skepticism to upgrade at a time when many people would love to downgrade from Vista.

Technorati Tags: ,

Loren, You’re Wrong About Twitter

Now, I’m not one for poking a wasp’s nest (been there, done that!) but Lorne Feldman is wrong about Twitter.

His post explaining why people tolerate Twitter’s up-and-down service features wide, sweeping generalizations, highlighted by the fact he believes Twitter users are frustrated bloggers with no readers and no comments, or people who are just bored with life or work.

There are many people who fall into these categories but Loren isn’t looking at Twitter’s potential as an interesting, focused and useful communications tool.

What Loren fails to acknowledge is you can use Twitter in whatever way you want. If, as Loren suggests, you want to write “pablum” you can do that, and there many people who happily do that, although it’s beyond me who would want to actually read the everyday details of your life (e.g. Traffic jam on I-95; Eating a cheeseburger, Hey, it’s sunny outside, etc.)

But Twitter can also be used to receive and consume information; you can use it to keep in touch with friends, peers and colleagues; you can use it as a marketing vehicle; or as a mini-blogging platform.

It’s the multi-dimensional aspect that has drawn people to Twitter despite its ongoing technical woes. I’m not suggesting Twitter is going to go mainstream any time soon or at all but it does deserve a little respect.

Perhaps the most fascinating part of Twitter is people keep sticking around as opposed to trying other services such as Pownce or Jaiku. Maybe it’s like drinking Coca-Cola; once you grow accustomed to the taste, there’s no way you’re going to try Pepsi even if it tastes as good or better.

Here’s Loren’s video if you’re curious:

Technorati Tags:

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...