<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Original Blog Thought is So Difficult</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/</link>
	<description>A Canadian Take on the Web</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Isaac</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/#comment-72499</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 04:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/#comment-72499</guid>
		<description>Hello -- I just happened to stumble across this blog post from floating around on google.  I figured I'd chime in and add a "me too" post in which I believe that the majority of blog responses by and large in just about any community has little to no relative value beyond just someone mindlessly adding yelling their comment just to be heard.  I think the general lack of Big Thoughts is symptomatic of our Here! Now! Simple! Fast! commercial society.  Generally, people don't have a NEED to think critically, nor are they given time to do so.  Even a person's down time to relax and collect themselves at the end of the day is usually full of preparing for the next day, or watching TV, cluttered with commercials jamming more simple thoughts into their minds.  Critical thinking, big thoughts, and intelligent conversation seems to be slowly fading away in our society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello &#8212; I just happened to stumble across this blog post from floating around on google.  I figured I&#8217;d chime in and add a &#8220;me too&#8221; post in which I believe that the majority of blog responses by and large in just about any community has little to no relative value beyond just someone mindlessly adding yelling their comment just to be heard.  I think the general lack of Big Thoughts is symptomatic of our Here! Now! Simple! Fast! commercial society.  Generally, people don&#8217;t have a NEED to think critically, nor are they given time to do so.  Even a person&#8217;s down time to relax and collect themselves at the end of the day is usually full of preparing for the next day, or watching TV, cluttered with commercials jamming more simple thoughts into their minds.  Critical thinking, big thoughts, and intelligent conversation seems to be slowly fading away in our society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gregory</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/#comment-71985</link>
		<dc:creator>gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/#comment-71985</guid>
		<description>i blame google ... page rank to be precise  .... also responsible for splogs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i blame google &#8230; page rank to be precise  &#8230;. also responsible for splogs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quality: When Enough Is Enough - Gnorb.NET - Online Home of Norbert Cartagena</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/#comment-63485</link>
		<dc:creator>Quality: When Enough Is Enough - Gnorb.NET - Online Home of Norbert Cartagena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 18:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/#comment-63485</guid>
		<description>[...] with that question came this link which asks about original blogging, and why it&#8217;s so difficult. Fact is, if you&#8217;ve never [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with that question came this link which asks about original blogging, and why it&#8217;s so difficult. Fact is, if you&#8217;ve never [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ardi XIV</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/#comment-55812</link>
		<dc:creator>Ardi XIV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/#comment-55812</guid>
		<description>[...] Deze post over origineel bloggen is alleszins het lezen waard.     No Comments, Comment or Ping [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Deze post over origineel bloggen is alleszins het lezen waard.     No Comments, Comment or Ping [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3by9 &#187; Stop Following Everybody, Stop Information Diarrhea, Start Being Interesting, Start Thinking For Yourself</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/#comment-55133</link>
		<dc:creator>3by9 &#187; Stop Following Everybody, Stop Information Diarrhea, Start Being Interesting, Start Thinking For Yourself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/#comment-55133</guid>
		<description>[...] opinions, you just have 16,000 things you read and you picked one to agree with. Once this happens, posting original thought to your blog is nearly impossible and you resort to the easy way out of analyzing someone [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] opinions, you just have 16,000 things you read and you picked one to agree with. Once this happens, posting original thought to your blog is nearly impossible and you resort to the easy way out of analyzing someone [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rubel is right &#171; The displaced Kiwi</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/#comment-54491</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rubel is right &#171; The displaced Kiwi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/#comment-54491</guid>
		<description>[...] has never been harder for those who don&#8217;t blog for a living. This is simply because it requires original thought - something people don&#8217;t have the time or patience to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has never been harder for those who don&#8217;t blog for a living. This is simply because it requires original thought - something people don&#8217;t have the time or patience to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/#comment-54420</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/#comment-54420</guid>
		<description>Kevin,

I'm not suggesting that because ignoring the news of the day would be wrong. What I am suggesting is if you're going to write on the news of the day, offer some perspective/insight as opposed to parroting what other people have to say. As well, writing original content that's not on Techmeme or TechCrunch is a fine idea too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not suggesting that because ignoring the news of the day would be wrong. What I am suggesting is if you&#8217;re going to write on the news of the day, offer some perspective/insight as opposed to parroting what other people have to say. As well, writing original content that&#8217;s not on Techmeme or TechCrunch is a fine idea too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Restivo</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/#comment-54419</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Restivo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/#comment-54419</guid>
		<description>So what's your final verdict? Think what you're saying is that you'd rather not write about the news of the day, according to Techmeme, TechCrunch, et al.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what&#8217;s your final verdict? Think what you&#8217;re saying is that you&#8217;d rather not write about the news of the day, according to Techmeme, TechCrunch, et al.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mindy McAdams</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/#comment-53725</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindy McAdams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/#comment-53725</guid>
		<description>Don't different blogs serve different purposes? We don't need two dozen Techmeme clones. Some blogs are very good "filter" blogs -- they link to lots of interesting stuff many times a day. Some blogs try to do that but are not as good at picking the best bits to link. 

Cyndy Aleo-Carreira siad (comment 18): "People don’t read a 1500-word piece about the future of digital music," but there's another way to say that -- VERY FEW PEOPLE "read a 1500-word piece about the future of digital music."

How many people read The New Yorker compared with the number who read People magazine? Diiferent vehicles for different content, different purposes, different results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t different blogs serve different purposes? We don&#8217;t need two dozen Techmeme clones. Some blogs are very good &#8220;filter&#8221; blogs &#8212; they link to lots of interesting stuff many times a day. Some blogs try to do that but are not as good at picking the best bits to link. </p>
<p>Cyndy Aleo-Carreira siad (comment 18): &#8220;People don’t read a 1500-word piece about the future of digital music,&#8221; but there&#8217;s another way to say that &#8212; VERY FEW PEOPLE &#8220;read a 1500-word piece about the future of digital music.&#8221;</p>
<p>How many people read The New Yorker compared with the number who read People magazine? Diiferent vehicles for different content, different purposes, different results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Blank: Publishing, Innovation &#38; the Web &#187; Blog Archive &#187; News of the Week 4/6/08</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/#comment-53670</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Blank: Publishing, Innovation &#38; the Web &#187; Blog Archive &#187; News of the Week 4/6/08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 18:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/30/why-original-blog-thought-is-so-difficult/#comment-53670</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Original Blog Thought is So Difficult &#34;The question that begs to be asked is why does there seem to be so much me-too blogging as opposed to people contributing different perspectives?&#34; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Original Blog Thought is So Difficult &quot;The question that begs to be asked is why does there seem to be so much me-too blogging as opposed to people contributing different perspectives?&quot; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
