<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SearchMe: Search with a Visual Twist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/29/searchme-search-with-a-visual-twist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/29/searchme-search-with-a-visual-twist/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leigh</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/29/searchme-search-with-a-visual-twist/#comment-53129</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/29/searchme-search-with-a-visual-twist/#comment-53129</guid>
		<description>The thing with search is, the goal is generally to find stuff.  

Tried the beta.  Total waste of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing with search is, the goal is generally to find stuff.  </p>
<p>Tried the beta.  Total waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Chen</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/29/searchme-search-with-a-visual-twist/#comment-52905</link>
		<dc:creator>John Chen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 07:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/29/searchme-search-with-a-visual-twist/#comment-52905</guid>
		<description>I hate it. 

Mark why do you cover sites like SearchMe. Just because Arrington covered them doesn't mean you have to do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate it. </p>
<p>Mark why do you cover sites like SearchMe. Just because Arrington covered them doesn&#8217;t mean you have to do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yakov</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/29/searchme-search-with-a-visual-twist/#comment-52902</link>
		<dc:creator>Yakov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 06:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/29/searchme-search-with-a-visual-twist/#comment-52902</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately for them, the best way to "beat" Google is not by building a better search destination site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately for them, the best way to &#8220;beat&#8221; Google is not by building a better search destination site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thusenth</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/29/searchme-search-with-a-visual-twist/#comment-52895</link>
		<dc:creator>Thusenth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/29/searchme-search-with-a-visual-twist/#comment-52895</guid>
		<description>I don't think SearchMe is in the same field as Idee and Riya.  From the looks of it, SearchMe seems to be more about displaying an actually screenshot of the website, and offering a more graphical and simple user interface to search - like the predefined categories with their own icons etc.

Idee and Riya are visual search engines relating to image similarities not the way the results are presented.  Riya's application of their image identification algorithms in Like.com is a great example of its usefulness.  Throw in a search term regarding a pair of shoes you want to find.. then hit the like button and you've got a lot of similar looking shoes, the materials its made of, and the shades that exist in them.  It's great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think SearchMe is in the same field as Idee and Riya.  From the looks of it, SearchMe seems to be more about displaying an actually screenshot of the website, and offering a more graphical and simple user interface to search - like the predefined categories with their own icons etc.</p>
<p>Idee and Riya are visual search engines relating to image similarities not the way the results are presented.  Riya&#8217;s application of their image identification algorithms in Like.com is a great example of its usefulness.  Throw in a search term regarding a pair of shoes you want to find.. then hit the like button and you&#8217;ve got a lot of similar looking shoes, the materials its made of, and the shades that exist in them.  It&#8217;s great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/29/searchme-search-with-a-visual-twist/#comment-52665</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/29/searchme-search-with-a-visual-twist/#comment-52665</guid>
		<description>I'm willing to give SearchMe the benefit of the doubt given it's still in private beta. I'm not suggesting it's ready for prime time but it has potential. I'll check as Splunk as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m willing to give SearchMe the benefit of the doubt given it&#8217;s still in private beta. I&#8217;m not suggesting it&#8217;s ready for prime time but it has potential. I&#8217;ll check as Splunk as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tris Hussey</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/29/searchme-search-with-a-visual-twist/#comment-52657</link>
		<dc:creator>Tris Hussey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/29/searchme-search-with-a-visual-twist/#comment-52657</guid>
		<description>I signed up for the beta ... I think it looks cool, but for day to day searching, yeah I agree with Daniel ... not useful enough.

When I want something I want to see all the  results and quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I signed up for the beta &#8230; I think it looks cool, but for day to day searching, yeah I agree with Daniel &#8230; not useful enough.</p>
<p>When I want something I want to see all the  results and quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/29/searchme-search-with-a-visual-twist/#comment-52656</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/29/searchme-search-with-a-visual-twist/#comment-52656</guid>
		<description>Daniel probably works for Google (or Splunk)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel probably works for Google (or Splunk)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Gibbons</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/29/searchme-search-with-a-visual-twist/#comment-52653</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 15:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/29/searchme-search-with-a-visual-twist/#comment-52653</guid>
		<description>I have a beta account for SearchMe and have found it spectacularly annoying to use. Google's success is all about better search, which means better results. In short, it's a utility from which the gimmick of SearchMe's interface simply distracts.

There is infinitely more innovation in the niche and vertical search players (Splunk, for instance).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a beta account for SearchMe and have found it spectacularly annoying to use. Google&#8217;s success is all about better search, which means better results. In short, it&#8217;s a utility from which the gimmick of SearchMe&#8217;s interface simply distracts.</p>
<p>There is infinitely more innovation in the niche and vertical search players (Splunk, for instance).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
