<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time for the Blog Portal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/25/time-for-the-blog-portal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/25/time-for-the-blog-portal/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Startups, Entrepreneurs and the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:25:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Gibbons</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/25/time-for-the-blog-portal/comment-page-1/#comment-52299</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/25/time-for-the-blog-portal/#comment-52299</guid>
		<description>I agree, this could be a great way to sort through the clutter. However the GigaOm example is an interesting one. I find that the fragmentation of the site into all the sub-sites has gone hand in hand with a sharp decline in the quality of the content. The result? I never read anything from that entire group of sites, meaning I miss out on Om&#039;s insight and analysis. Sometimes the issue is that there is just too much low value content chasing after pageviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, this could be a great way to sort through the clutter. However the GigaOm example is an interesting one. I find that the fragmentation of the site into all the sub-sites has gone hand in hand with a sharp decline in the quality of the content. The result? I never read anything from that entire group of sites, meaning I miss out on Om&#8217;s insight and analysis. Sometimes the issue is that there is just too much low value content chasing after pageviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/25/time-for-the-blog-portal/comment-page-1/#comment-52284</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/25/time-for-the-blog-portal/#comment-52284</guid>
		<description>Steve: You&#039;re right, using Netvibes et al is one way of creating a customized &quot;blog portal&quot;. I&#039;m just suggesting that the big blog networks might make themselves more user-friendly by embracing another format to distribute content. 

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve: You&#8217;re right, using Netvibes et al is one way of creating a customized &#8220;blog portal&#8221;. I&#8217;m just suggesting that the big blog networks might make themselves more user-friendly by embracing another format to distribute content. </p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveh</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/25/time-for-the-blog-portal/comment-page-1/#comment-52283</link>
		<dc:creator>steveh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/25/time-for-the-blog-portal/#comment-52283</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused...how is this &#039;blog portal&#039; any different than setting up a Netvibes (or Pageflakes, etc.) layout using only your most pertinent blog RSS feeds?  Or better, with &#039;sub-feeds&#039; from different topics from each blog.  (assuming each blog actually breaks down their content into more granular feeds)

Bonus: if the RSS feeds are constructed and populated well, you never have to actually go to the blog with the poor &#039;one post below the other&#039; layout. (ads are still included in RSS feeds, so the blog won&#039;t necessarily lose much in that area either)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused&#8230;how is this &#8216;blog portal&#8217; any different than setting up a Netvibes (or Pageflakes, etc.) layout using only your most pertinent blog RSS feeds?  Or better, with &#8216;sub-feeds&#8217; from different topics from each blog.  (assuming each blog actually breaks down their content into more granular feeds)</p>
<p>Bonus: if the RSS feeds are constructed and populated well, you never have to actually go to the blog with the poor &#8216;one post below the other&#8217; layout. (ads are still included in RSS feeds, so the blog won&#8217;t necessarily lose much in that area either)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdhedengren</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/25/time-for-the-blog-portal/comment-page-1/#comment-52280</link>
		<dc:creator>tdhedengren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/25/time-for-the-blog-portal/#comment-52280</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re not really talking about a portal here, Mark, you&#039;re talking about a dedicated front page with cover stories.

And yes, absolutely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re not really talking about a portal here, Mark, you&#8217;re talking about a dedicated front page with cover stories.</p>
<p>And yes, absolutely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: felix</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/25/time-for-the-blog-portal/comment-page-1/#comment-52269</link>
		<dc:creator>felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/25/time-for-the-blog-portal/#comment-52269</guid>
		<description>A new layout might work, but with more content on the homepage, I fear that it might also require more clicking since they probably would just show summaries instead of full posts? My own solution to the problem is Google Reader - let&#039;s me easily find older stuff that I&#039;m looking for either starred or with the search. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new layout might work, but with more content on the homepage, I fear that it might also require more clicking since they probably would just show summaries instead of full posts? My own solution to the problem is Google Reader &#8211; let&#8217;s me easily find older stuff that I&#8217;m looking for either starred or with the search. <img src='http://www.markevanstech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smallman</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/25/time-for-the-blog-portal/comment-page-1/#comment-52267</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/25/time-for-the-blog-portal/#comment-52267</guid>
		<description>Agreed.

It&#039;s bad enough suffering from Social Network Fatigue without being stricken with Information Diarrhea, too.

A portal makes a lot of sense, so long as we can add tags to sort the content we&#039;re most interested in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s bad enough suffering from Social Network Fatigue without being stricken with Information Diarrhea, too.</p>
<p>A portal makes a lot of sense, so long as we can add tags to sort the content we&#8217;re most interested in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/25/time-for-the-blog-portal/comment-page-1/#comment-52265</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/03/25/time-for-the-blog-portal/#comment-52265</guid>
		<description>I think that&#039;s a great idea.  I hate having to scroll down to find some story I&#039;m looking for.  I would rather be able to see a lot at once with a short description next to the title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s a great idea.  I hate having to scroll down to find some story I&#8217;m looking for.  I would rather be able to see a lot at once with a short description next to the title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

