<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Reporters Have Private Blogs? Sure.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/01/24/should-reporters-have-private-blogs-sure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/01/24/should-reporters-have-private-blogs-sure/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Startups, Entrepreneurs and the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:25:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dykeman</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/01/24/should-reporters-have-private-blogs-sure/comment-page-1/#comment-40803</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/01/24/should-reporters-have-private-blogs-sure/#comment-40803</guid>
		<description>Mark, I have a different take on this situation.

First, the journalist, Will Leitch, wrote the blog post about Cuban at Valleywag as a sort of guest post, not at his own blog.  I&#039;m not that familiar with Valleywag, but I doubt it could be considered Leitch&#039;s private blog, despite his affiliation with Deadspin.

Second, the post wasn&#039;t centered around the fact that Leitch interviewed Cuban, it was centered around Leitch&#039;s opinion that Cuban would never stand a chance of being able to buy a Major League Baseball team (at least that&#039;s my take on Leitch&#039;s post.)

I would say that Cuban would be more angry about the implication that he couldn&#039;t join an old boys club than the fact that the report chose to wrote a blog post about him without asking.  I wager that Cuban might be using this so-called betrayal of trust as an excuse.  I doubt Cuban would have complained if Leitch&#039;s blog post was more charitable.

In principle, I don&#039;t think there&#039;s an issue with a journalist commenting on their own work in their own private sandbox.  I just don&#039;t think this scenario was a good example of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, I have a different take on this situation.</p>
<p>First, the journalist, Will Leitch, wrote the blog post about Cuban at Valleywag as a sort of guest post, not at his own blog.  I&#8217;m not that familiar with Valleywag, but I doubt it could be considered Leitch&#8217;s private blog, despite his affiliation with Deadspin.</p>
<p>Second, the post wasn&#8217;t centered around the fact that Leitch interviewed Cuban, it was centered around Leitch&#8217;s opinion that Cuban would never stand a chance of being able to buy a Major League Baseball team (at least that&#8217;s my take on Leitch&#8217;s post.)</p>
<p>I would say that Cuban would be more angry about the implication that he couldn&#8217;t join an old boys club than the fact that the report chose to wrote a blog post about him without asking.  I wager that Cuban might be using this so-called betrayal of trust as an excuse.  I doubt Cuban would have complained if Leitch&#8217;s blog post was more charitable.</p>
<p>In principle, I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s an issue with a journalist commenting on their own work in their own private sandbox.  I just don&#8217;t think this scenario was a good example of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

