<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Markus Frind: Work a Little, Make a Lot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/01/12/markus-frind-work-a-little-make-a-lot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/01/12/markus-frind-work-a-little-make-a-lot/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:09:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/01/12/markus-frind-work-a-little-make-a-lot/comment-page-1/#comment-37011</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/01/12/marcus-frind-work-a-little-make-a-lot/#comment-37011</guid>
		<description>Free - has a huge part of it... 

a) if you&#039;re looking for love, why not cast a free net too...

b) as Tom mentioned, he doesn&#039;t really care if people go elsewhere as well (see a.)

c) I&#039;m guessing a LOT of users use the ads as shortcuts back to their pay dating site of choice. I&#039;d be interested to know how many UNIQUE click-throughs POF generates to other dating sites.

(Added benefit is Dating is likely a hugely competitive keyword space - so CPC is probably $$$$)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free &#8211; has a huge part of it&#8230; </p>
<p>a) if you&#8217;re looking for love, why not cast a free net too&#8230;</p>
<p>b) as Tom mentioned, he doesn&#8217;t really care if people go elsewhere as well (see a.)</p>
<p>c) I&#8217;m guessing a LOT of users use the ads as shortcuts back to their pay dating site of choice. I&#8217;d be interested to know how many UNIQUE click-throughs POF generates to other dating sites.</p>
<p>(Added benefit is Dating is likely a hugely competitive keyword space &#8211; so CPC is probably $$$$)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/01/12/markus-frind-work-a-little-make-a-lot/comment-page-1/#comment-36996</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/01/12/marcus-frind-work-a-little-make-a-lot/#comment-36996</guid>
		<description>I had never actually thought of it from that perspective but it makes a lot of sense. Still, there has to be a reason that POF gets so much traffic given there are so many other slicker online dating services. Perhaps, free is also part of the secret advantage too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had never actually thought of it from that perspective but it makes a lot of sense. Still, there has to be a reason that POF gets so much traffic given there are so many other slicker online dating services. Perhaps, free is also part of the secret advantage too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Purves</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/01/12/markus-frind-work-a-little-make-a-lot/comment-page-1/#comment-36995</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Purves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markevanstech.com/2008/01/12/marcus-frind-work-a-little-make-a-lot/#comment-36995</guid>
		<description>I am convinced that the terribleness of the site is it&#039;s biggest secret advantage. The interface is _just_ functional enough to attract an audience, but more than crappy enough (in an oh-so-we-didn&#039;t-know-better-looking) to continually drive a steady stream of click-thrus to the advertising partners - almost all of whom are slick, for-pay dating services (probably with great affiliate payouts per new refered customer).

it&#039;s sad/funny how, sometimes, the worse the design, the better the business model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am convinced that the terribleness of the site is it&#8217;s biggest secret advantage. The interface is _just_ functional enough to attract an audience, but more than crappy enough (in an oh-so-we-didn&#8217;t-know-better-looking) to continually drive a steady stream of click-thrus to the advertising partners &#8211; almost all of whom are slick, for-pay dating services (probably with great affiliate payouts per new refered customer).</p>
<p>it&#8217;s sad/funny how, sometimes, the worse the design, the better the business model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
