<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog OverLoad, Anyone?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/10/23/blog-overload-anyone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/10/23/blog-overload-anyone/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:09:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Omar Ismail</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/10/23/blog-overload-anyone/comment-page-1/#comment-8688</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Ismail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/2007/10/23/blog-overload-anyone/#comment-8688</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s one &quot;top 100&quot; blog I can think of that posts an inordinate amount of content that is ridiculous. It&#039;s gotten to the point where I&#039;m thinking of unsubscribing the feed. And I definitely agree with you about quality, which isn&#039;t to say length. ReadWriteWeb does a good job of giving deep analysis, sometimes it can go TOO deep, but often they hit the right sweet spot.

Frankly, most people already subscribe to TechCrunch so there&#039;s no point in just announcing news. Giving unique perspectives and insight let&#039;s you talk about the &quot;hot&quot; news of the day and gives readers something useful to work with, not just another me-too headline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s one &#8220;top 100&#8243; blog I can think of that posts an inordinate amount of content that is ridiculous. It&#8217;s gotten to the point where I&#8217;m thinking of unsubscribing the feed. And I definitely agree with you about quality, which isn&#8217;t to say length. ReadWriteWeb does a good job of giving deep analysis, sometimes it can go TOO deep, but often they hit the right sweet spot.</p>
<p>Frankly, most people already subscribe to TechCrunch so there&#8217;s no point in just announcing news. Giving unique perspectives and insight let&#8217;s you talk about the &#8220;hot&#8221; news of the day and gives readers something useful to work with, not just another me-too headline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
