Comments on: Google Stock to the Moon? Why Not? http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/10/09/google-stock-to-the-moon-why-not/ Thoughts on Startups, Entrepreneurs and the Web Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:25:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: E Guy http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/10/09/google-stock-to-the-moon-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-48010 E Guy Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:08:52 +0000 http://markevanstech.com/2007/10/09/google-stock-to-the-moon-why-not/#comment-48010 Follow up...Google shares now at $450. Still think $2000 is within reach? “Those that are ignorant or forget history are destined to repeat it”... Follow up…Google shares now at $450. Still think $2000 is within reach?

“Those that are ignorant or forget history are destined to repeat it”…

]]> By: Rojo: Video AdSense; Buyout Fever; Bubble Watch 2.0 at Food Safety Trends http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/10/09/google-stock-to-the-moon-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-7123 Rojo: Video AdSense; Buyout Fever; Bubble Watch 2.0 at Food Safety Trends Sun, 14 Oct 2007 01:14:29 +0000 http://markevanstech.com/2007/10/09/google-stock-to-the-moon-why-not/#comment-7123 [...] was bought by CBS for $10 million. There are differences from the 1.0 boom, such as Google stock cracking the $600 barrier based on billions in profits (via Mark Evans). Say what you like about the last bubble, at least it [...] [...] was bought by CBS for $10 million. There are differences from the 1.0 boom, such as Google stock cracking the $600 barrier based on billions in profits (via Mark Evans). Say what you like about the last bubble, at least it [...]

]]> By: Andrew Andreoli http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/10/09/google-stock-to-the-moon-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-7093 Andrew Andreoli Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:49:15 +0000 http://markevanstech.com/2007/10/09/google-stock-to-the-moon-why-not/#comment-7093 Fodder like Mr. Blodget's is the reason why Google's stock just might triple - again. It's similar to the call for $100 oil. It just might happen, as much by irrational behaviour than financial prudence. Fodder like Mr. Blodget’s is the reason why Google’s stock just might triple – again. It’s similar to the call for $100 oil. It just might happen, as much by irrational behaviour than financial prudence.

]]> By: E Guy http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/10/09/google-stock-to-the-moon-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-7083 E Guy Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:31:01 +0000 http://markevanstech.com/2007/10/09/google-stock-to-the-moon-why-not/#comment-7083 Irrational investors do not remain investors for long. It is hard to invest with zero assets. Irrational investors do not remain investors for long. It is hard to invest with zero assets.

]]> By: Mark Evans http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/10/09/google-stock-to-the-moon-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-7071 Mark Evans Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:27:18 +0000 http://markevanstech.com/2007/10/09/google-stock-to-the-moon-why-not/#comment-7071 Rational analysis may not justify $2,000 but who says investors are rational? Rational analysis may not justify $2,000 but who says investors are rational?

]]> By: E Guy http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/10/09/google-stock-to-the-moon-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-7069 E Guy Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:35:35 +0000 http://markevanstech.com/2007/10/09/google-stock-to-the-moon-why-not/#comment-7069 "Those that are ignorant or forget history are destined to repeat it". It's about the fundamentals not hype. Remember when eBay could do no wrong? How about Nortel? The list of overhyped stocks is legendary from not only the dot com era but also the 1920s, South Sea Bubble etc. Rational analysis simply does not project Google at $2,000 per share in the near term. “Those that are ignorant or forget history are destined to repeat it”. It’s about the fundamentals not hype. Remember when eBay could do no wrong? How about Nortel? The list of overhyped stocks is legendary from not only the dot com era but also the 1920s, South Sea Bubble etc.

Rational analysis simply does not project Google at $2,000 per share in the near term.

]]>