| Subscribe via RSS

Wordpress Help, Please

September 30th, 2007 | 2 Comments | Posted in Aside

I’ve got a small blog side project happening. One issue I’ve been unable to resolve is changing the permalink structure. Right now, it’s http://thisisablog.com/?p=155 but I want it to be http://thisisablog.com/2007/09/28/wordpress-help-please. I’ve fiddled around the permalink option within Wordpress and some re-direct plug-ins but it appears I need to do something with htaccess so I can keep the old permalinks links “alive” while implementing new permalinks for all posts. Any help would be much appreciated.

Related Posts

Is Vista Becoming New Coke?

September 28th, 2007 | 6 Comments | Posted in Microsoft

Vista-2
When Coca-Cola decided to “improve” the formula for its flagship product in 1985, it was a marketing disaster. Soon after New Coke hit the market, consumers were demanding for the return of Old Coke. After some posturing, Coca-Cola did an embarrassing strategic reversal by bringing back the old formula a few months later. While New Coke wasn’t pulled off the market, it died a slow, ignominious death.

In some respects, Microsoft now finds itself in a similar predicament. Vista is supposed to be a superior operating system to XP. Five years in the making, it is supposed to be a major upgrade over XP - much more than XP was an improvement over Windows 98.

Unfortunately, Vista is threatening to become New Coke. While Microsoft and Windows are always big, juicy targets for criticism, Vista has been given a rough ride - perhaps unfairly - by consumers and the media. Vista’s problems have not only left many consumers pining for XP but encouraging many people to stick with XP. For the billions of dollars sunk into Vista’s creation, the growing love affair with XP must be frustrating for many people in Redmond.

So what does Microsoft do? If it admits Vista is a problem child, then it cuts the knees out from under its new flagship OS and a new, high-margin source of revenue growth. At the same time, Microsoft needs to meet the needs of its consumers. If many of them want XP because it’s more stable and has fewer problems, Microsoft should, in theory, do what consumers want - something Seth Godin would likely give his stamp of approval.

While Microsoft is not going to abandon Vista, it is making modest concessions when it comes to XP. The latest move is a decision to extend the availability of XP for computer makers and retailers for another five months until June 30, 2008. It will also continue to make XP available in emerging markets where people have computers that don’t have a powerful processor and/or lots of RAM and memory. This is a significant concession even though it appears to be a minor move.

Microsoft is trying to spin this decision as a recognition “some customers need a little more time to make the switch to Vista” but the reality is many customers have no interest in Vista because they’re content with XP - at least for the time being.

If Microsoft’s not careful and continues to insist on ramming Vista into the market, do not be surprised if there is a backlash among some consumers. Much like New Coke spawned the Old Cola Drinkers of America to be organized, can it only be a matter of time before the “XP Lovers Unite” is created?

Ballmer

If I were Steve Ballmer, I’d play to consumers rather than force-feeding them Vista. If consumers like XP and want to keep using it, why not institute a new Windows portfolio strategy that features Vista and XP. Clearly, they play into two different markets with different needs. If you support both, it will make consumers happy and give Microsoft more time to improve Vista. If Vista gets better, XP customers will eventually migrate.

That said, I would be highly surprised if Microsoft decided to give XP more love and attention. After all, it’s an old operating system that served its purpose, while Vista is designed what for consumers need today and in the years ahead. If may take consumers some time to realize it but Microsoft is not going to abandon a product evolution strategy that has served it well for more than 20 years.

More: Mary Jo Foley wonders if XP is too good for Microsoft’s own good, including a quote from a Microsoft executive who concedes the one year phase-out period for XP may be too ambitious. Ars Technica adds one “other thing working against XP’s demise is the poor reputation—deserved or not—that Vista has begun to acquire.”

Related Posts

Does it Really Matter?

September 27th, 2007 | No Comments | Posted in Microsoft

A couple of big developments today - Microsoft introducing a new and improved Live Search, while LinkedIn gets really radical by giving people the ability to - wait for it - add photos to their profiles.

Question: Does it really matter?

For all the excitement about a better Live Search that quadruples its coverage range, how much of a difference will it really make in winning people over from Google? And why should anyone be excited about being able to add a photo to LinkedIn? Big deal. If LinkedIn were really savvy, they would be opening up their API as soon as possible so it can encourage people to develop cool add-ons/extensions.

Yes, you can accuse me of being overly critical. After all, the only way Microsoft is going to be able to close the huge gap between itself and Google is by making improvements. They may not be radical or work wonders overnight but if you’re going to stay in the game, even getting a little bit better is a good thing.

The big difference between Microsoft and LinkedIn is Microsoft is playing catchup while LinkedIn risks losing its stature as a leading social network for business people by not moving fast enough. The rapid emergence of Facebook’s applications shows the value of creating a large and vibrant ecosystem that only enhances the parent.

The reality is Microsoft and LinkedIn are doing what’s necessary to stay viable but neither move warrants a flurry of news coverage.

Related Posts

Bill Gross’ Next Gig(s)

September 27th, 2007 | No Comments | Posted in Search Engines

Bill Gross
Bill Gross has always been someone who has fascinated me. As one of the leading entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley, Gross has pursued his own path - sometimes enjoying spectacular success (CitySearch) and sometimes major disappointment (eToys).

While Gross probably doesn’t get nearly enough credit for it, he’s also the guy who pretty much invented the ultra-lucrative paid-search concept with Overture - a concept that a couple of young entrepreneurs named Larry and Sergey “borrowed” as they scrambled to find a business model for some cool search technology they had developed but couldn’t quite figure out how to monetize. While Google is now worth about $175-billion, the payoff for Gross was a paltry $1.6-billion when Overture was snapped up by Yahoo in 2003.

During the dot-com boom, Gross was right in the midst of it with his Idealab incubator - a start-up/entrepreneurial machine that churned out companies like they were going out of style. When the boom went bust, everyone - including Gross - licked their wounds and waited for the next investment cycle to begin.

And while Web 2.0 has captured the imagination of millions and created a second wave of dot-com start-ups, Gross has decided to place his bets elsewhere. Rather than Web 2.0, Gross is engross in Energy 2.0, particularly solar power and clean technology. His current portfolio includes Energy Innovations (low-cost roof-top solar electricity); eSolar (grid scale arrays); Aptera Motors (an aerodynamic vehicle); and Stirling Cycles (a low-cost engine to generate electricity in your home).

Gross was all over alternative energy long before the rest of Silicon Valley caught the bug. While green is suddenly hip and politically correct, Gross was already investing and innovating. If you’re looking for an entrepreneur to show you where the best opportunities are happening, Gross is someone you definitely have to watch.

For more on Gross, check out Erick Schonfeld’s interview with him in the last issue of Business 2.0.

Related Posts

Let’s Go Shopping..or It’s an M&A Bonanza!

September 26th, 2007 | No Comments | Posted in M&A

Deals
I’m not quite sure I agree with Kara Swisher’s view that Silicon Valley is getting more delusional by the minute but there’s certainly a huge amount of bullishness and cash gushing around these days.

While the IPO is still trying to figure out whether it wants to come back to life, there have been a flurry of deals consummated recently that clearly suggest everyone is feeling pretty optimistic about how the Web is evolving into a place where business is happening. Here’s a short list of some of the acquisitions recently announced:

- Yahoo-BlueLithium ($300-million cash)
- Yahoo-BuzzTracker ($5-million)
- Yahoo-Zimbra ($350-million cash)
- EMC-Mozy.com $76-million)
- Echostar - Sling Media ($380-million)
- Real Networks - Gametrust ($50-million)
- Sugar Publishing - ShopStyle.com (n/a)

Then, you’ve got major financings. As everyone knows by now, Facebook is apparently auctioning off a very small stake for a very large amount of cash, while Glam Media hopes to raise a whopping $200-million.

So why the extreme bullishness? And what does all the deal-making suggest? It great to see this kind of activity but there seems to be a strange disconnect when given the economic volatility now happening in the U.S.

Related Posts

Where are the Apple Knockoffs?

September 26th, 2007 | 2 Comments | Posted in Aside

The power supply on my MacBook crapped out, which seems to be a common issue judging by some of the forums I visited. When I went looking for a replacement, one thing that struck me is how Apple has tight control over the peripheral market. The only power supply available was a $99 unit from Apple. Isn’t there some large factory in China pumping out knockoffs for $20. At that price, I’d buy a power supply for home and one for work.

Related Posts

Can You Say EchoBox?

September 25th, 2007 | No Comments | Posted in M&A

Sling-1
The Slingbox is downright cool. It’s one of those devices that you never realize how much you like until you actually use it to remotely watch your home television over the Web.

As much I love the Slingbox, I always had two questions about the company. Is it possible to build a big enough business by selling a $100 to $250 product that may not have mainstream appeal? And who would eventually buy Sling Media at a high enough price to justify the more than $50-milllion of venture capital it has received?

Not sure if the first question will be answered soon but the second answer is: EchoStar Communications, which has scooped up Sling for $380-million. Along with Goldman Sachs, Liberty Media, Allen & Co., Doll Capital, Mobius Venture Capital and The Hearst Corp., EchoStar participated in Sling’s $46.6-million financing round in January 2006.

EchoStar must figure it can use the Sling platform to meet the needs of mobile couch potatoes, especially those who use its DISH pay-TV service. And it’s a nice marketing tool to compete against rivals such as DirecTV, Comcast and Time-Warner.

Sling is one of those cool companies that you’re happy to see succeed but kind of sad to see snapped up. As much as the product will continue to be part of the landscape, I’m not sure it will have the same cache now that it’s owned by a large, established company.

More: PaidContent has an interview with Sling co-founder Blake Krikorian, who said Sling was about to do a “pretty healthy” financing round before it was approached by several buyers. Jeremy Toeman, who was VP of marketing with Sling, calls the deal a “pretty solid win-win relationship” that will help both parties.

Related Posts

$100M = 1% = Wow!

September 24th, 2007 | No Comments | Posted in Microsoft

According to the Wall St. Journal, Microsoft has held preliminary discussions to invest $100-million in Facebook based on a valuation of $10-billion…or more. It’s astounding that $100-million would give Microsoft a 1% stake. Of course, a $100-million investment in Google right now would give you a 0.06% stake.

So what’s next? Has Facebook started an investment auction that will see Google commit to a $1-billion investment for 5%? How much cash does Rupert Murdoch still have left after buying MySpace and the Wall St. Journal?

One more thought: Does anyone in the tech world keep secret any more? Judging from leaks about deals being made (e.g. EMC-Mozy), new strategic initiative (Google’s Facebook-killer) and investments (Microsoft-Facebook), mnay people can’t help but spill the beans. Maybe this info-spillage is just a fact of life in this instant information/instant gratification age in which we live.

Update: Jeremy Toeman brings some sane thoughts to the blog-o-frenzy by pointing out that the WSJ is chock-o-block with speculation, coulds, woulds and may. Meanwhile, Mathew Ingram cranks up the speculation by suggesting Microsoft’s interest in Facebook could prompt Yahoo to acquire Facebook. Man, it’s great when bloggers get so hot and bothered! So many words, so many thoughts! Kara Swisher, meanwhile, takes a very healthy swipe at the financial fascination with Facebook, suggesting Silicon Valley is becoming more delusional by the minute.

Related Posts

Google: Is There Life Beyond Search and AdSense?

September 24th, 2007 | 2 Comments | Posted in Google

Google Muscle
Hey, I’m just as Google-obsessed as the next guy. After all, it’s impossible not to be fascinated by a company with the world’s dominant search engine, an ad business that tosses off billions of dollars in profits, and a willingness to give its R&D people the freedom to launch pretty much anything what they want.

But for all the Google strategic initiatives and news - most recently, a potential Second Life-like service, presentations, a Facebook-killer strategy, plans to build an undersea cable across the Pacific Ocean - what is Google other than a company with two killer apps: search and AdSense?

Don’t get me wrong, it’s awesome one-two punch that has pumped its market cap to $174-billion and made Sergey Brin and Larry Page among the top-five richest people in the world. But beyond search and AdSense, has Google really - and I mean really - succeeded at anything else?

GMail’s been successful as a rival to Yahoo and Hotmail; Blogger has become one of the leading blogging platforms, Google Reader has stormed on to the RSS stage, YouTube could become a killer app if consumers are willing to pay for online video, while Google Earth is downright cool. Google Docs, meanwhile, has a solid following but it’s far more interesting as a potential rival to Microsoft Office, while Picasa, Froogle, Google Blog Search and GTalk are nothing to write home about.

Aside from perhaps YouTube, all of the services above play modest supporting roles to search and AdSense. For all the stuff coming out of the GooglePlex, Google is really no different from a business perspective than it was two or three years ago. As long as the online advertising market sees strong growth and Google can leverage its ability to sell relevant advertising, the golden goose (search and AdSense) will continue to lay very profitable eggs.

But when you think about it, Google is not unlike Microsoft. Huh? Well, Google has search and AdSense while Microsoft has Windows and Office. Not that there’s anything wrong with having two dominant products that generate billions in sales and profits.

Microsoft has spent years trying to expand beyond Windows and Office, pursuing areas such as cable, Internet access, game consoles, portals and search. Yet, Microsoft is still a two-trick pony. Google has been strategically aggressive as well with the launch of new online services, acquisitions, a push into the advertising market (radio, newspapers) and lots of activity in the wireless market (wither the GPhone?)

All of this activity is good and necessary for large companies such as Microsoft and Google to stay vibrant and maintain their growth. That said, it’s a huge challenge finding another killer, high-growth business. Truth be told, it could be that Google’s ongoing success will consist of many, many sources driving AdSense as opposed to one killer idea.

More: Hugh MacLeod has some thoughts Microsoft, capped off by his belief Microsoft has to stop letting other people tell its story. MakeUseof offers up a nice list of “10 Google Services That Get No Love”.

Related Posts

EMC Snaps Up Mozy

September 23rd, 2007 | No Comments | Posted in Aside

According to TechCrunch, EMC has acquired Mozy, a popular online storage start-up. Mozy has become an important part of my small portfolio “go to” Web-based services along with Paypal, StumbleUpon, eBay and Google Reader. Mozy works because it’s a snap to set up and configure, user-friendly and, most important, it does the job. I’ve been using the free version, which gives you 2GB of storage. As much as it sucks when a cool start-up is snapped up by a corporate behemoth, it’s encouraging to see that Mozy attracted a $76-million takeover offer - a huge win for its investors who provided $1.9-million in financing. Here’s hoping EMC doesn’t screw up a very good thing.

Related Posts






  • Wikio - Top Blogs - Technology