<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Googles Gets into Storage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/08/10/googles-gets-into-storage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/08/10/googles-gets-into-storage/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aswath</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/08/10/googles-gets-into-storage/#comment-6585</link>
		<dc:creator>Aswath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/2007/08/10/googles-gets-into-storage/#comment-6585</guid>
		<description>I am interested in the pricing strategy. It may be true that the storage may be virtually free, but transport costs are not. So if I upload an album to Picasa and my tons of buddies can be downloading it to watch them. So I am curious to know how to model the usage so that I can predict the incurred transmission cost. I am stumped on this point for an application that I am developing. My current thinking is that metered charge is more transparent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested in the pricing strategy. It may be true that the storage may be virtually free, but transport costs are not. So if I upload an album to Picasa and my tons of buddies can be downloading it to watch them. So I am curious to know how to model the usage so that I can predict the incurred transmission cost. I am stumped on this point for an application that I am developing. My current thinking is that metered charge is more transparent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gmail Storage Counter Stopped Counting. Not a Rip-off, but &#8230;&#124; Zoli&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/08/10/googles-gets-into-storage/#comment-6582</link>
		<dc:creator>Gmail Storage Counter Stopped Counting. Not a Rip-off, but &#8230;&#124; Zoli&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/2007/08/10/googles-gets-into-storage/#comment-6582</guid>
		<description>[...] Between the Lines, Computerworld, ParisLemon, Insider Chatter, Google Blogoscoped, Googlified, Mark Evans, Geek Speaker, VentureBeat, Web Strategy,&#160; jkOnTheRun,&#160; Googling Google, Damien Mulley, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Between the Lines, Computerworld, ParisLemon, Insider Chatter, Google Blogoscoped, Googlified, Mark Evans, Geek Speaker, VentureBeat, Web Strategy,&nbsp; jkOnTheRun,&nbsp; Googling Google, Damien Mulley, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
