| Subscribe via RSS

Simple Way to Find Web 2.0 Apps

June 25th, 2007 | No Comments | Posted in Aside

I few years ago, I co-founded a company called Blanketware that aimed to make it easy to do things online as opposed to using the Web as a place to read stuff. Our original service was based on the tagline “I want [fill in the blank]“. Sadly, the business was ahead of its time - actually, it was just waiting for AdSense to arrive to become a viable operation. In any event, I stumbled across a cool search service called Simplespark that lets you find and share useful Web 2.0 applications. It is what Blanketware could have been.

Related Posts

LinkedIn vs. Facebook? Not Really

June 25th, 2007 | 4 Comments | Posted in Uncategorized

There’s lots of buzz about LinkedIn opening up its API to outside developers - and the inevitable comparisons with Facebook, which pulled off the same stunt a couple weeks ago. It has caused some people such as my friend, Mathew Ingram, to wonder if LinkedIn and Facebook are competing, and if LinkedIn stands a chance in the face of the Facebook Phenomena (aka FP).

In a sense, LinkedIn and Facebook are competing given they’re both popular and useful social networking tools. That said, they’re different beasts with different wrinkles and characteristics. LinkedIn is a serious corporate networking tool. You recommend me to a colleague, and then when I want to do some business, I’ll contact them - or something like that. Facebook, for now, is about the consumer and fun/entertainment. It’s not about business.

Of course, there will be some overlap. LinkedIn users who into social networking will, no doubt, check out Facebook as another valuable tool to get the word out. I mean, half the reason I’m in Facebook is having my professional profile available to a huge audience. And maybe some Facebook users will check out LinkedIn, although I suspect it will be parents as opposed to their children.

What’s pretty amazing about Facebook is it has 11 million members and, more important, it’s a profitable business. By the way, b5media has a great LinkedIn blog, Linked Intelligence.

Related Posts

Five Things That Could Kill Facebook

June 24th, 2007 | 43 Comments | Posted in Web 2.0

For all the excitement about Facebook’s explosive growth, it somehow feels like a huge fad that could disappear or, at least, dissipate, if something cooler comes rumbling over the horizon. When parents and businesses start embracing Facebook, it’s probably the time for the new “bar” down the street to suddenly get “hot”.

Based on posts by Brad Feld and Fred Wilson, here’s my list of why Facebook could go from fast-growing to so yesterday sooner than we think:

1. The evolution of its business model: What many people like about Facebook is it has a clean, easy-to-access look and feel. You log in, you quickly see what’s been happening in your world, you do your thing. What happens when Facebook starts to introduce more advertising into the mix so it can start taking advantage of its billions of pageviews? Suddenly, the lean look disappears as the business model starts to move onto the scene.

2. In-box Contamination: Facebook works right now because you decide how big or small you want your community to be. As much as Facebook is hot, it’s still manageable in terms of deciding who you want to invite/accept as a friend. But what happens - as Fred Wilson points out - when you’re swamped with Facebook invites? Suddenly, Facebook runs into the same annoying problem as Plaxo and LinkedIn as your in-box gets invitation contamination.

3. Application noise. For all the excitement about Facebook opening its API to the world, it’s also more noise for users. I can’t tell you how many multiple invitations I’ve got for Flixster, for example. It’s already getting annoying. This is an issue Fred Wilson focused on.

4. The IPO: There’s plenty of speculation Facebook could go public later year - a move that would allow Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg to pull some money out of the company without giving up control. Once Facebook becomes a business that needs to meet the lofty expectations of Wall St., it’s about the same time that the fun and all-for-one, one-for-all mentality starts to disappear.

5. Facebook Fatigue: Right now, Facebook is fun, it’s new, it’s a novelty but how useful is it really? How long before the millions of people who have piled into Facebook stop checking their profiles every day or, for that matter, every week.

Don’t get me wrong; I think Facebook is a fascinating social phenomena as well as an amazing social networking tool. Maybe I’m being too pragmatic or a non-believer but every party reaches a zenith before leveling out so I’m curious about when that time comes for Facebook.

Note: For an interesting take on Facebook’s future, check out Richard Stelmach’s post on what Facebook could look like in 40 years.

Technorati Tags:

Related Posts

Hey, We’re Talking Tech

June 23rd, 2007 | No Comments | Posted in Podcasting

Talking Tech-6
Hey, we’re back with another Talking Tech podcast - and this week, the three amigos (Mark Evans, Duncan Stewart and Kevin Restivo are all in the house).

In Canada, the big news within the tech/telecom sectors is Telus’ interest in doing something with Bell Canada, which has been on the auction block for the past month or so. It appears the federal government has given its tacit approval for Telus and Bell to join forces based on the assumption that a strong national carrier will be able to compete when/if foreign ownership rules disappear.

In the Web world, Jerry Yang’s ascension to Yahoo’s CEO following the decision to boot Terry Semel was a huge, if somewhat surprising move. My take is Yahoo is floundering strategically and seems to have lost its sense of direction and personality. Yahoo used to be fun; now it’s dull and corporate. Whether Yang can change things is a big uncertain.

Finally, we take a look at whether the increasing strong Canadian dollar is going to hurt the Canadian tech sector, which has thrived by being a cheap place for U.S firms to do R&D.

Related Posts

$400M for a Domain Name!!!

June 22nd, 2007 | 2 Comments | Posted in Aside

In 1999, when Business.com was purchased $7.5-million, it was a shocking development. Imagine paying that much money for a URL. Well, the owners - Jake Winebaum and Sky Dayton - have put the domain name on the auction block, and they’re expecting to get $300-million to $400-million for it. Unreal! The list of potential buyers includes Dow Jones and the New York Times.

Related Posts

The Real Music Story

June 22nd, 2007 | No Comments | Posted in Music

Manucaho
Music.

It’s not really about MP3s.

Or the iPod.

Or iTunes.

Or Napster, Rhapsody, eHarmony, AllofMP3.com, etc.

It’s really about the live performance.

Manu Chao.

500 people @ the Koolhaus in Toronto.

Unbelievable energy. Frenetic.

Two hours of non-stop showmanship.

Lots of dancing - a big feat for a Toronto audience.

Amazing.

For the geek crowd, tons of people with cell phones and digital cameras recording the concert.

It used to be people held up Bic lighters; now it’s wireless/digital devices!

Expecting to see clips on YouTube in a minute now.

Related Posts

“Blog” Must Go!

June 21st, 2007 | 6 Comments | Posted in Blogs

I’m not a big believer in surveys but there’s definitely something to a recent one conducted by YouGov that found that “blogosphere”, “blog”, “netiquette”, “cookie” and “wiki” were among the most irritating words within the Web.

As much as blogs put food on my family’s table, “blog” is a word that I have mixed emotions about. To be honest, I’d be very happy if “blog” disappeared - and you can take “ecosystem” and “paradigm shift” with it. There has to be a better word than “blog” to describe a communications medium that is so exciting, alive and dynamic. Blog sounds like how you feel after drinking too much, spend too much time stuck in traffic, or not getting enough sleep. :)

When you’re at a party and people ask what you do in your spare time, wouldn’t it be great to use a word other than blog? So what would you call a blog other than a blog?

Related Posts

Bellus or TelCanada?

June 21st, 2007 | 5 Comments | Posted in ILEC News, Analysis, M&A

The takeover soap opera that has become Bell Canada has become even more complex now that Telus, Canada’s second-largest carriers, has disclosed it’s interested in a merger with Bell, the country’s largest carrier.

So why does this deal make sense as opposed a leveraged buyout by private equity firms flush with billions of dollars that desperately needs a home? According to UBS, there are four major reasons:

1. Bell avoids privatization
2. No foreign ownership issues and apparently looked favorably upon by the federal government
3. Lots of synergies (a.k.a. operating costs can be slashed)

If a Telus-Bell deal does manage to materialize, the next question is what’s next for the Canadian telecom/cable landscape. Does Shaw go rushing into the arms of Rogers? Does Quebecor and Videotron Cogeco join forces. Does Bell Aliant buy Eastlink? If you’re an investment banker, it’s money time. If you’re a consumer, choice may be about to go extinct.

Related Posts

Wanted: Kick-Ass Music Bloggers

June 20th, 2007 | No Comments | Posted in Aside

b5media will be launching a new music channel soon. If you’re passionate about music, head on over to b5media.com/jobs and tell us what you’d like to write about.

Related Posts

Does the Office War Start Now?

June 20th, 2007 | 2 Comments | Posted in Google, M&A

Google has rounded out its office suite portfolio with the purchase of Zenter, which makes software for online slide presentations, from Y Combinator. Ironically, Zenter co-founder Wayne Crosby said earlier this year that “We want to be the Gmail of PowerPoint.”

So the Google portfolio now includes;

Google Docs (Word, Excel)
GMail Google Calendar (Outlook)
Zenter (PowerPoint)

So, let’s get this office war between Google and Microsoft really started now that Google has pretty much the same arsenal as Microsoft. As well, Google is rolling out Google Gears, which will allow for off-line capabilities. The big question is while Google is ready for Office users, are Office users really ready for Google, especially within a corporate environment? My sense is maybe small and medium size businesses will be early adopters but Big Business will mostly sit on the sidelines for awhile. After all, no CIO ever got fired for buying Microsoft, right?

For more thoughts, check out Om Malik, who points out Google won’t be successful unless it can have seamless integration between all its applications. Meanwhile, Read/WriteWeb has a good rundown on the online applications suites now available.

Related Posts


  • TwitterCounter for @markevans


  • Wikio - Top Blogs - Technology