Comments on: MySpace.ca, Anyone? http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/05/20/myspaceca-anyone/ Insight and Analysis from North of the Border Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:55:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: brian http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/05/20/myspaceca-anyone/comment-page-1/#comment-95119 brian Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:05:37 +0000 http://markevanstech.com/2007/05/20/myspaceca-anyone/#comment-95119 i understand wut u mean. but ive got a question. if ur school blocks the myspace canada, how do u get around it? i understand wut u mean. but ive got a question. if ur school blocks the myspace canada, how do u get around it?

]]> By: Mark http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/05/20/myspaceca-anyone/comment-page-1/#comment-5495 Mark Mon, 28 May 2007 20:23:34 +0000 http://markevanstech.com/2007/05/20/myspaceca-anyone/#comment-5495 I actually do not believe that Mr. Murdoch is interested in acquiring myspace.ca. In addition, I strongly disagree with Rihan about her squatting comment. 1) I'll address the squatting first. Squatting is when someone registers a domain of a 'known' trademark in order to make profit out of its traffic. As we all know, myspace.com came into fame end of 2004. Who heard about that website before? To make my point, please check this Alexa traffic snapshot of myspace.com over last 6 years (Click on the 'max' tab): http://alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=myspace.com/&url=myspace.com/ You will note that the myspace.com traffic was negligible up till mid 2004. The domain myspace.ca was registered back in 2000 close to 4 years before myspace.com was anything to talk about. Note also in this regard how myspace.us was registered on June 2004 again making it undeniable that 'myspace' was not really indicative of any hot web property prior to 2004. Based on that fact alone, I can state with 100% certainty that there is NO squatting in the case of myspace.ca. The following only confirms the above: a) the myspace.ca website has been active since 2002 and has hundreds of pages indexed by the search engines. It has lots of intelligent content. There are personal poems, travelogues and movie reviews. Check for example the 'Inside man' review. There is no BS makebelieve content here but rather a sophisticated in depth review. b) I do not see how the owner of myspace.ca is making profit from that website. There are no ads, no Adsense, no paid links, no product promotion. All I see is a personal site with personal content. If you want to see classic squatting take a look at youtube.ca, myspace.us, and facebook.ca. None of these has any content and all the domains either are profiting from PPC links or forward to a competing website. Furhermore, all urls were registered between June 2004 and December 2005. The combo of post fame registration, no content, and profit is the classic definition of squatting. 2) I do not believe Mr. Murdoch has any interest in myspace.ca based on the fact that the 'international links' at myspace.com lists the various urls of their international sites. All are of the form xx.myspace.com. The company has already advertsised and branded these links and so that to me is enough proof that myspace.com has no interest in acquiring any of the country myspace domains including myspace.ca. As a matter of fact, if they had such interest, they would have gone after myspace.us, something that is very simple to do since it's a straight forward squatting case. It has not done so as expected. It simply has no interest in the country domains including myspace.ca. Mark I actually do not believe that Mr. Murdoch is interested in acquiring myspace.ca. In addition, I strongly disagree with Rihan about her squatting comment.

1) I’ll address the squatting first. Squatting is when someone registers a domain of a ‘known’ trademark in order to make profit out of its traffic.

As we all know, myspace.com came into fame end of 2004. Who heard about that website before?

To make my point, please check this Alexa traffic snapshot of myspace.com over last 6 years (Click on the ‘max’ tab):

http://alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=myspace.com/&url=myspace.com/

You will note that the myspace.com traffic was negligible up till mid 2004.

The domain myspace.ca was registered back in 2000 close to 4 years before myspace.com was anything to talk about. Note also in this regard how myspace.us was registered on June 2004 again making it undeniable that ‘myspace’ was not really indicative of any hot web property prior to 2004. Based on that fact alone, I can state with 100% certainty that there is NO squatting in the case of myspace.ca.

The following only confirms the above:

a) the myspace.ca website has been active since 2002 and has hundreds of pages indexed by the search engines. It has lots of intelligent content. There are personal poems, travelogues and movie reviews. Check for example the ‘Inside man’ review. There is no BS makebelieve content here but rather a sophisticated in depth review.

b) I do not see how the owner of myspace.ca is making profit from that website. There are no ads, no Adsense, no paid links, no product promotion. All I see is a personal site with personal content.

If you want to see classic squatting take a look at youtube.ca, myspace.us, and facebook.ca. None of these has any content and all the domains either are profiting from PPC links or forward to a competing website. Furhermore, all urls were registered between June 2004 and December 2005. The combo of post fame registration, no content, and profit is the classic definition of squatting.

2) I do not believe Mr. Murdoch has any interest in myspace.ca based on the fact that the ‘international links’ at myspace.com lists the various urls of their international sites. All are of the form xx.myspace.com. The company has already advertsised and branded these links and so that to me is enough proof that myspace.com has no interest in acquiring any of the country myspace domains including myspace.ca. As a matter of fact, if they had such interest, they would have gone after myspace.us, something that is very simple to do since it’s a straight forward squatting case. It has not done so as expected. It simply has no interest in the country domains including myspace.ca.

Mark

]]> By: Mark http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/05/20/myspaceca-anyone/comment-page-1/#comment-5483 Mark Sun, 27 May 2007 19:30:32 +0000 http://markevanstech.com/2007/05/20/myspaceca-anyone/#comment-5483 I actually do not believe that Mr. Murdoch is interested in acquiring myspace.ca. In addition, I strongly disagree with Rihan about her squatting comment. 1) I'll address the squatting first. Squatting is when someone registers a domain of a 'known' trademark in order to make profit out of its traffic. As we all know, myspace.com came into fame end of 2004. Who heard about that website before? To make my point, please check this Alexa traffic snapshot of myspace.com over last 6 years (Click on the 'max' tab): http://alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=myspace.com/&url=myspace.com/ You will note that the myspace.com traffic was negligible up till the end of 2004. The domain myspace.ca was registered back in 2000 close to 4 years before myspace.com was anything to talk about and in other words it is impossible that this is squatting. Furthermore, the myspace.ca website has been active since 2002 and has hundreds of pages indexed by the search engines. It has lots of no BS intelligent content. There are personal poems, travelogues and movie reviews. Check for example http://myspace.ca/movies/review-inside-man-810.html There is no BS here. Intelligent and sophisticated is what comes to mind actually. If you want to see classic squatting take a look at youtube.ca, myspace.us, and facebook.ca 2) I do not believe Mr. Murdoch has any interest in myspace.ca based on the following: http://www.myspace.com/modules/internationallink/pages/internaltionallink.aspx You will see that myspace.com has already made public and branded its international list of websites and they are all of the form xx.myspace.com Australia au.myspace.com Canada (in English) ca.myspace.com Canada (en Français) cf.myspace.com France fr.myspace.com Germany de.myspace.com Ireland ie.myspace.com Italy it.myspace.com Japan jp.myspace.com Mexico mx.myspace.com Netherlands nl.myspace.com New Zealand nz.myspace.com Spain es.myspace.com U.K. uk.myspace.com United States www.myspace.com and so I think it's clear that myspace.com will not try to acquire any the corresponding myspace country domains. Mark I actually do not believe that Mr. Murdoch is interested in acquiring myspace.ca. In addition, I strongly disagree with Rihan about her squatting comment.

1) I’ll address the squatting first. Squatting is when someone registers a domain of a ‘known’ trademark in order to make profit out of its traffic.

As we all know, myspace.com came into fame end of 2004. Who heard about that website before?

To make my point, please check this Alexa traffic snapshot of myspace.com over last 6 years (Click on the ‘max’ tab):

http://alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=myspace.com/&url=myspace.com/

You will note that the myspace.com traffic was negligible up till the end of 2004.

The domain myspace.ca was registered back in 2000 close to 4 years before myspace.com was anything to talk about and in other words it is impossible that this is squatting.

Furthermore, the myspace.ca website has been active since 2002 and has hundreds of pages indexed by the search engines. It has lots of no BS intelligent content. There are personal poems, travelogues and movie reviews. Check for example

http://myspace.ca/movies/review-inside-man-810.html

There is no BS here. Intelligent and sophisticated is what comes to mind actually.

If you want to see classic squatting take a look at youtube.ca, myspace.us, and facebook.ca

2) I do not believe Mr. Murdoch has any interest in myspace.ca based on the following:

http://www.myspace.com/modules/internationallink/pages/internaltionallink.aspx

You will see that myspace.com has already made public and branded its international list of websites and they are all of the form xx.myspace.com

Australia au.myspace.com

Canada (in English) ca.myspace.com

Canada (en Français) cf.myspace.com

France fr.myspace.com

Germany de.myspace.com

Ireland ie.myspace.com

Italy it.myspace.com

Japan jp.myspace.com

Mexico mx.myspace.com

Netherlands nl.myspace.com

New Zealand nz.myspace.com

Spain es.myspace.com

U.K. uk.myspace.com

United States http://www.myspace.com

and so I think it’s clear that myspace.com will not try to acquire any the corresponding myspace country domains.

Mark

]]> By: Rehan http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/05/20/myspaceca-anyone/comment-page-1/#comment-5432 Rehan Sun, 20 May 2007 14:06:25 +0000 http://markevanstech.com/2007/05/20/myspaceca-anyone/#comment-5432 I don't think Ali Atif is the actual registrant of the domain. If you look closely at the whois information for myspace.ca, you'll see a note about the domain owner using a private registration service. The Wayback Machine Archive at http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://myspace.ca shows that there was actually nothing on the site until quite recently. So clearly the owner is squatting on the domain. But I think as long as the domain was registered before the real Myspace registered their trademark in Canada, there won't be a forced transfer. I don’t think Ali Atif is the actual registrant of the domain. If you look closely at the whois information for myspace.ca, you’ll see a note about the domain owner using a private registration service.

The Wayback Machine Archive at http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://myspace.ca shows that there was actually nothing on the site until quite recently. So clearly the owner is squatting on the domain. But I think as long as the domain was registered before the real Myspace registered their trademark in Canada, there won’t be a forced transfer.

]]>