Is there such a thing as a “workaround” that actually, well, works? It strikes me that whenever a company gets in trouble for infringing on someone else’s IP, the company doing the infringing says “No worries, we’ve got a workaround somewhere around here that we had put aside for a rainy day”. Vonage, for example, claimed it had a workaround after a U.S. judge ruled it had infringed on technology owned by Verizon, while Research in Motion talked about a workaround during the latter stage of its legal woes with NPT Inc.
We never found out whether or not RIM did have a workaround because it ended up forking over more than six hundred extra-large ones (aka millions) to make NTP go away. Now, Vonage has admitted it doesn’t have a workaround after suggesting last week it had a workaround in development . Even worse, Vonage isn’t sure that a workaround is “feasible” given the extent of Verizon’s patents. This is bad news because it means Vonage will likely be unable to sign up new customers unless it reaches a patent deal with Verizon. Maybe Vonage’s new CEO, Jeff Citron (who used to be the old CEO), will be able to strike a deal with Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg.
For more, check out Thomas Howe, who is incredulous Vonage can’t create a workaround, as well as Engadget.
Technorati Tags: Vonage
One Comment
Absolutely Mark. When Stac pursued Microsoft over alleged violations of disk compression patents, Microsoft changed the algorithms in it’s drivespace compression feature in DOS 6.0 to work around.