<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Unclear Prospects of IP-TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/04/01/the-unclear-prospects-of-ip-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/04/01/the-unclear-prospects-of-ip-tv/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Startups, Entrepreneurs and the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:25:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: b</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/04/01/the-unclear-prospects-of-ip-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-4830</link>
		<dc:creator>b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 03:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/2007/04/01/the-unclear-prospects-of-ip-tv/#comment-4830</guid>
		<description>It is a little unclear what is happening. Bell reported in December that it had passed one million homes with the FTTN network. This is a year behind the original schedule you cite (1M per year for four years). However, the announced plan was to double that during 2007 by getting back to the 1 million per year pace. This would represent an acceleration of the IPTV deployment.

If the Globe &amp; Mail story is accurate, this pace will then slow down with the final two million (there are no plans to cover the rest of Bell&#039;s customers beyond the 4.3 million homes mentioned) taking an additional three years (to end of 2010 or early 2011) -- and ending up a full two years behind schedule.

Given that IPTV has been put off to as late as 2008 (despite the same press release you mention describing it as ready for launch &quot;shortly thereafter&quot;), the pace of the network roll-out may not matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a little unclear what is happening. Bell reported in December that it had passed one million homes with the FTTN network. This is a year behind the original schedule you cite (1M per year for four years). However, the announced plan was to double that during 2007 by getting back to the 1 million per year pace. This would represent an acceleration of the IPTV deployment.</p>
<p>If the Globe &amp; Mail story is accurate, this pace will then slow down with the final two million (there are no plans to cover the rest of Bell&#8217;s customers beyond the 4.3 million homes mentioned) taking an additional three years (to end of 2010 or early 2011) &#8212; and ending up a full two years behind schedule.</p>
<p>Given that IPTV has been put off to as late as 2008 (despite the same press release you mention describing it as ready for launch &#8220;shortly thereafter&#8221;), the pace of the network roll-out may not matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

