<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wired Is Good but Weird</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/01/23/wired-is-good-but-weird/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/01/23/wired-is-good-but-weird/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael O'Connor Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/01/23/wired-is-good-but-weird/#comment-2510</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael O'Connor Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=2053#comment-2510</guid>
		<description>Amen, Mark - I'm like you in terms of the love-hate relationship thing.  I think the overall quality of their editorial work has been improving greatly in the past year, but the design still throws me off sometimes - and people like you and me are (I would have thought) pretty much exactly the target demographic. I like that the magazine is as much a thing of art as of science, but I hate that my failing eyes have to strain to decipher some of the more creative layouts.

At least their designers these days (usually) manage to steer clear of that completely unreadable 8-point grey text on a silver background that was one of their favourites throughout the mid-90s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen, Mark - I&#8217;m like you in terms of the love-hate relationship thing.  I think the overall quality of their editorial work has been improving greatly in the past year, but the design still throws me off sometimes - and people like you and me are (I would have thought) pretty much exactly the target demographic. I like that the magazine is as much a thing of art as of science, but I hate that my failing eyes have to strain to decipher some of the more creative layouts.</p>
<p>At least their designers these days (usually) manage to steer clear of that completely unreadable 8-point grey text on a silver background that was one of their favourites throughout the mid-90s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/01/23/wired-is-good-but-weird/#comment-2496</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=2053#comment-2496</guid>
		<description>Loved reading the articles also, and I seem to remember seeing a short Televised report about this company a few months ago on SRC. This is the type of tech, that should get more press and I comend you for doing just that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved reading the articles also, and I seem to remember seeing a short Televised report about this company a few months ago on SRC. This is the type of tech, that should get more press and I comend you for doing just that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary King</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/01/23/wired-is-good-but-weird/#comment-2493</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=2053#comment-2493</guid>
		<description>On the contrary, I like the design of Wired magazine. Makes me look forward to the fact that I'm not reading another TIME or Fast Company magazine (both which I also subscribe to.) Of course, the advertisements begin to blend into the rest of the content with this newest design, but that was their intention all along...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the contrary, I like the design of Wired magazine. Makes me look forward to the fact that I&#8217;m not reading another TIME or Fast Company magazine (both which I also subscribe to.) Of course, the advertisements begin to blend into the rest of the content with this newest design, but that was their intention all along&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/01/23/wired-is-good-but-weird/#comment-2492</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=2053#comment-2492</guid>
		<description>Michael,
I really enjoyed it, and it seems like you had a good time doing the research. I would have linked to it but couldn't find it on the Wired site.

cheers, Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,<br />
I really enjoyed it, and it seems like you had a good time doing the research. I would have linked to it but couldn&#8217;t find it on the Wired site.</p>
<p>cheers, Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Behar</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2007/01/23/wired-is-good-but-weird/#comment-2491</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Behar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=2053#comment-2491</guid>
		<description>Mark, I'm blushing. Thanks for the very kind words about my article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, I&#8217;m blushing. Thanks for the very kind words about my article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
