| Subscribe via RSS

Can the MSFT Titantic Change Directions?

December 9th, 2006 Posted in Media, Microsoft, Uncategorized, Web 2.0, Web-based Services

Can a tiger change its stripes? Can you turn water into wine? Can Ray Ozzie and Steve Berkowitz transform Microsoft into an Internet company from its Windows/Office roots? This is a question highlighted by the New York Times, which looks at Microsoft efforts to beef up is online operations through initiatives such as Live. At the risk of under-playing the dominance of Internet Explorer and the popularity of MSN.com, Microsoft isn't an Internet company and, frankly, it will never be seen as anything else other than a giant software company with some interesting side projects (e.g. Xbox).

This isn't necessarily a bad thing but it is what it is even though Microsoft has been struggling to convince people otherwise for the past decade. If you take a step back, Microsoft's track record beyond Windows and Office has been, at best, mediocre. A good example is television where it has toiled for years and spent billions of dollars to establish a foothold in the living room. Microsoft has acquired stakes in cable companies, purchased start-ups (anyone remember WebTV?) and, most recently, tried to developed an IP-TV platform for carriers. But after all this time, money and effort, Microsoft only has a modest presence in the TV or video markets.

Microsoft's problem - and challenge - is the Internet isn't part of the corporate DNA so it's hard to really be a vibrant and innovative Internet player when it's not really who you are. A part of this reality is Microsoft continues to make billions of dollars from selling Windows and Office. It's the business so Microsoft's lack of success in diversifying into other businesses is no different than what many other companies have faced over the years. Microsoft, however, is fortunate its core business continues to rumble along as opposed to being forced to diversify because the core business is eroding.

What Microsoft and investors need to accept is Microsoft will continue to be a software company with a Web presence as long as its continue to operate in its present form. If, however, the company decided to break itself into independent operations (Windows/Office, Xbox, MSN/Internet) then it might be a different story because each entity would have its own core mission and raison d'etre. In the meantime, Microsoft will attempt to fight the good Internet fight while chasing after dyed-in-the-wool Internet rivals such as Google and Yahoo.

For more on Berkowitz, News.com recently did a Q&A with him. By the way, read what you will into this quote Berkowitz gave the NYT about life at Microsoft compared with his previous employer, Ask.com: “I’m used to being in companies where I am in a rowboat and I stick an oar in the water to change direction. Now I’m in a cruise ship and I have to call down, Hello, engine room!. Sometimes the connections to the engine room aren’t there.”

Technorati Tags: ,

3 Responses to “Can the MSFT Titantic Change Directions?”

  1. Anonymous Says:

    I agree with much you have said and I do believe Microsoft shouldn't try to be something it is not. However I want to remind people of a few important facts that may help change some thinking. As in the past, Microsoft has done something really clever… it has some how managed to get a say in big standardization projects. It first started out with several of the common protocols now used in much of the technology used today… they managed to get a say in hardware development techniques and standardization for compatibility with windows.
    Microsoft gets in on the ground floor of tons of projects…. even as I type this Microsoft is in deep with OpenXML which is going up for standardization approval in front of the ISO here real soon. This could mean a bigger part for Microsoft in the future of Office online and merging much of what is done with desktop apps with the Internet.
    I cannot count how many times Microsoft has managed to bully markets around by developing the very heart of what other companies use. Other companies that do this (for example IBM) all manage to hold onto their respective markets because of it.
    While the MSFT Titanic may be hard to steer, and take years to turn around on a good idea, they are more like an arctic icebreaker that can break the market ice… so in the end MSFT always gets where it needs to be and very few can stand in its way. (Except for maybe the Google and Yahoo icebergs which are more like an ice shelf… but we shall see what happens).


  2. Anonymous Says:

    XBOX is a side project?
    Wow, could not disagree more. Whilst they have lost money on it is a multi-billion $ product line that has taken share from Sony PlayStation, generated some successful titles (Halo), and has 8M+ users in the XBOX Live community.
    That hardly is a side project.


  3. Imagina Says:

    Well OpenXML just got ECMA approval. Once again MSFT gets at the ground floor to force other to work with them.
    On another note, they should really put more focus on Xbox development. Back in 2000 I saw a presentation from Sony that talked about how they were going to develop the box that will be the entertainment hub of the household. This is where Microsoft should also focus the Xbox. With Voice over IP, Video/Audio Conferencing, Video Calling, Collaboration, Games, Music, Movies, Web 2.0 etc. the power of the processor is almost limitless for basic applications on a broadband connection.


Leave a Reply




  • Wikio - Top Blogs - Technology