<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodbye, Google Answers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/11/29/goodbye-google-answers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/11/29/goodbye-google-answers/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/11/29/goodbye-google-answers/#comment-2106</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=1939#comment-2106</guid>
		<description>Rex has a good point, but as I asked him in his comments, if Wikipedia is the reason Google Answers didn&#39;t work, then why is Yahoo Answers doing so well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rex has a good point, but as I asked him in his comments, if Wikipedia is the reason Google Answers didn&#39;t work, then why is Yahoo Answers doing so well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/11/29/goodbye-google-answers/#comment-2105</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=1939#comment-2105</guid>
		<description>Interesting that you should post about this, as I was just looking at the Google Labs page yesterday. While I can understand the need to let a company&#39;s embedded creativity loose, one has to ask how many resources are being committed to unworthy pet projects. Examples from Google Labs include Google Suggest (interesting, but a somewhat annoying user experience) and Google Sets (some have noted its usefulness for generating keywords, but the quality of a few tests provided marginal results). While I&#39;m at it, you might as well throw in Google Ride Finder, Google Transit and Google Mars.
Maybe I&#39;m wrong and this will all come together in one giant "Aha!" moment. So far, all this seems like spaghetti thrown at the wall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that you should post about this, as I was just looking at the Google Labs page yesterday. While I can understand the need to let a company&#39;s embedded creativity loose, one has to ask how many resources are being committed to unworthy pet projects. Examples from Google Labs include Google Suggest (interesting, but a somewhat annoying user experience) and Google Sets (some have noted its usefulness for generating keywords, but the quality of a few tests provided marginal results). While I&#39;m at it, you might as well throw in Google Ride Finder, Google Transit and Google Mars.<br />
Maybe I&#39;m wrong and this will all come together in one giant &#8220;Aha!&#8221; moment. So far, all this seems like spaghetti thrown at the wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
