<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newspapers 2.0 - The Five &#38;quot;W&#38;quot;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/10/22/newspapers-20-the-five-quotwquots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/10/22/newspapers-20-the-five-quotwquots/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/10/22/newspapers-20-the-five-quotwquots/#comment-1974</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=1844#comment-1974</guid>
		<description>Interesting. One question I have, is that by abandoning the typical time-sensitve "news" that people get form other sources (which I do agree the newspapers don&#39;t really need to cover anymore), aren&#39;t they sort of morphing into magazines? Magazines typically cover subjects in more depth. I just wonder if the newspapers may face an even harder road, changing into something that already exists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. One question I have, is that by abandoning the typical time-sensitve &#8220;news&#8221; that people get form other sources (which I do agree the newspapers don&#39;t really need to cover anymore), aren&#39;t they sort of morphing into magazines? Magazines typically cover subjects in more depth. I just wonder if the newspapers may face an even harder road, changing into something that already exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/10/22/newspapers-20-the-five-quotwquots/#comment-1973</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 13:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=1844#comment-1973</guid>
		<description>Excellent thoughts, Mark.
I added one more question to the 5-Ws on my site: HOW?
And I offer a quick disruptive framework to help newspaper executives answer that:
http://www.ondisruption.com/my_weblog/2006/10/fivews_for_fixi.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent thoughts, Mark.<br />
I added one more question to the 5-Ws on my site: HOW?<br />
And I offer a quick disruptive framework to help newspaper executives answer that:<br />
<a href="http://www.ondisruption.com/my_weblog/2006/10/fivews_for_fixi.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ondisruption.com/my_weblog/2006/10/fivews_for_fixi.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/10/22/newspapers-20-the-five-quotwquots/#comment-1972</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=1844#comment-1972</guid>
		<description>Excellent summary, Mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent summary, Mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
