<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will IE7 Kill Firefox?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/10/19/will-ie7-kill-firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/10/19/will-ie7-kill-firefox/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maciek</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/10/19/will-ie7-kill-firefox/#comment-5534</link>
		<dc:creator>Maciek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 08:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=1839#comment-5534</guid>
		<description>Jesus god man. Just take this page down. Please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus god man. Just take this page down. Please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/10/19/will-ie7-kill-firefox/#comment-1964</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=1839#comment-1964</guid>
		<description>IE 7 is a joke.
Its basically a lite early Firefox. Everything is copied and nothing is improved.
And your statistics are a bit off. Firefox has over 28% of current browsing my friend. Thats over a quarter.
I predict IE 7 will drive more people to Firefox.
Once IE 6 people switch over to 7 and learn the new system many will try Firefox and find its system much more user-friendly and customizable. Microsoft is going to LOSE users in the switchover from 6 to 7. Mark my words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE 7 is a joke.<br />
Its basically a lite early Firefox. Everything is copied and nothing is improved.<br />
And your statistics are a bit off. Firefox has over 28% of current browsing my friend. Thats over a quarter.<br />
I predict IE 7 will drive more people to Firefox.<br />
Once IE 6 people switch over to 7 and learn the new system many will try Firefox and find its system much more user-friendly and customizable. Microsoft is going to LOSE users in the switchover from 6 to 7. Mark my words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/10/19/will-ie7-kill-firefox/#comment-1963</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 16:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=1839#comment-1963</guid>
		<description>IE7 is good but so is Firefox 2.0. I&#39;m using both. Firefox is built for some sites and so is IE. I use Firefox for doing my email and googling. I use IE 7 for browsing microsoft sites and at work. Firefox 2.0 is better though. Less memory use, and a lot faster page load times. Try both it. My friends like IE 7 more. I like Firefox more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE7 is good but so is Firefox 2.0. I&#39;m using both. Firefox is built for some sites and so is IE. I use Firefox for doing my email and googling. I use IE 7 for browsing microsoft sites and at work. Firefox 2.0 is better though. Less memory use, and a lot faster page load times. Try both it. My friends like IE 7 more. I like Firefox more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/10/19/will-ie7-kill-firefox/#comment-1962</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 21:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=1839#comment-1962</guid>
		<description>For Firefox: I don&#39;t understand people&#39;s complaints about memory leaks. I&#39;ve been using Fx 1.5 on a 233 MHz Pentium II computer with 128 MB RAM, and didn&#39;t see any serious problems.
But it is true (and you can certainly feel it on a slow computer) that IE6 was a lot faster then either Firefox or Opera.
Now I&#39;m writing this on a more modern machine. I&#39;ve just tried IE7 and as someone who got converted from IE mainly because it couldn&#39;t properly magnifiy text (you young people with big monitors don&#39;t really understand how important this may be), I am very disappointed. IE7&#39;s page zooming is almost completely useless. Even though this page resizes just fine with the browser window, when I zoom the page, a horizontal scrollbar appears. On magnified pages sometimes you have to hover near the links (and not above them) to highlight them. I am really surprised to see that such an essential feature has so serious bugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Firefox: I don&#39;t understand people&#39;s complaints about memory leaks. I&#39;ve been using Fx 1.5 on a 233 MHz Pentium II computer with 128 MB RAM, and didn&#39;t see any serious problems.<br />
But it is true (and you can certainly feel it on a slow computer) that IE6 was a lot faster then either Firefox or Opera.<br />
Now I&#39;m writing this on a more modern machine. I&#39;ve just tried IE7 and as someone who got converted from IE mainly because it couldn&#39;t properly magnifiy text (you young people with big monitors don&#39;t really understand how important this may be), I am very disappointed. IE7&#39;s page zooming is almost completely useless. Even though this page resizes just fine with the browser window, when I zoom the page, a horizontal scrollbar appears. On magnified pages sometimes you have to hover near the links (and not above them) to highlight them. I am really surprised to see that such an essential feature has so serious bugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Courtney</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/10/19/will-ie7-kill-firefox/#comment-1961</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Courtney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=1839#comment-1961</guid>
		<description>Seems llike Alec Saunders (formerly Product Manager for the original IE in 1995) &lt;a href="http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/18/clarion-call-ie-7-not-ready-for-prime-time/" rel="nofollow"&gt;still finds the latest release candidate buggy&lt;/a&gt;.
But of course the MS people did not listen and apparenlty are unleashing it on us as we discuss it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems llike Alec Saunders (formerly Product Manager for the original IE in 1995) <a href="http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/18/clarion-call-ie-7-not-ready-for-prime-time/" rel="nofollow">still finds the latest release candidate buggy</a>.<br />
But of course the MS people did not listen and apparenlty are unleashing it on us as we discuss it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/10/19/will-ie7-kill-firefox/#comment-1960</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=1839#comment-1960</guid>
		<description>I think it was Andrew Marr who first expressed the rule about articles with headlines that end with a question mark. "The answer is no". 
Firefox are too far ahead on features already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it was Andrew Marr who first expressed the rule about articles with headlines that end with a question mark. &#8220;The answer is no&#8221;.<br />
Firefox are too far ahead on features already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tris Hussey</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/10/19/will-ie7-kill-firefox/#comment-1959</link>
		<dc:creator>Tris Hussey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=1839#comment-1959</guid>
		<description>I switched to IE7 from Firefox at about beta2.  I just got sick and tired of the memory leaks.  I&#39;ve found that I do like IE7 and like like all the cool things I&#39;ve been missing that integrate with IE (like MindManager).
But when IE7 is pushed out, I know I&#39;m going to have to be doing tech support with friends and family because it&#39;s new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I switched to IE7 from Firefox at about beta2.  I just got sick and tired of the memory leaks.  I&#39;ve found that I do like IE7 and like like all the cool things I&#39;ve been missing that integrate with IE (like MindManager).<br />
But when IE7 is pushed out, I know I&#39;m going to have to be doing tech support with friends and family because it&#39;s new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/10/19/will-ie7-kill-firefox/#comment-1958</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=1839#comment-1958</guid>
		<description>IE7 as uber-browser...not so much. 
I downloaded it awhile ago as a beta. I use it solely to access Microsoft&#39;s TechNet forums, since they won&#39;t render quite right in Firefox. Mind you I had a heck of time getting IE 7&#39;s security permissions set right to access microsoft.com in the first place.
As a developer, I don&#39;t care for it. It still gives cryptic information for debugging ASP code - Firefox is much more explicit. Firefox is also better at helping debug JavaScript - which with the explosion in AJAX lately, is a very important feature for developers once again.
As an IT Professional, supporting corporate users, I don&#39;t care for IE7 either. My users are quite confused by the interface. They are much more comfortable with IE6. I could spend awhile tweaking IE7 to more closely resemble a UI that works - or I can just leave everyone on IE6. Hmmm. 
So, IE7 is not for me. But then again, the first thing I did with XP was change the interface to classic windows. I like the functionality of the newer software, but does the UI have to change? Microsoft, take a hint from Ford and Mopar, go back to what works on the outside and just leave the updates to the engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE7 as uber-browser&#8230;not so much.<br />
I downloaded it awhile ago as a beta. I use it solely to access Microsoft&#39;s TechNet forums, since they won&#39;t render quite right in Firefox. Mind you I had a heck of time getting IE 7&#39;s security permissions set right to access microsoft.com in the first place.<br />
As a developer, I don&#39;t care for it. It still gives cryptic information for debugging ASP code - Firefox is much more explicit. Firefox is also better at helping debug JavaScript - which with the explosion in AJAX lately, is a very important feature for developers once again.<br />
As an IT Professional, supporting corporate users, I don&#39;t care for IE7 either. My users are quite confused by the interface. They are much more comfortable with IE6. I could spend awhile tweaking IE7 to more closely resemble a UI that works - or I can just leave everyone on IE6. Hmmm.<br />
So, IE7 is not for me. But then again, the first thing I did with XP was change the interface to classic windows. I like the functionality of the newer software, but does the UI have to change? Microsoft, take a hint from Ford and Mopar, go back to what works on the outside and just leave the updates to the engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
