<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging 101: Building Brand vs. Traffic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/09/30/blogging-101-building-brand-vs-traffic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/09/30/blogging-101-building-brand-vs-traffic/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/09/30/blogging-101-building-brand-vs-traffic/#comment-1869</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=1798#comment-1869</guid>
		<description>Mark - we&#39;re pretty much at the point where we can get ads in RSS. It&#39;s inevitable. 
RSS gets counted as part of &#39;readership.&#39;
Personally, I prefer to think brand first. I don&#39;t care if only 100 readers turn up (it&#39;s actually a lot more) at my place becasue those that do are therer for a reason. And I have a pretty good idea who they are. Virtually every post draws at least one comment these days so that&#39;s attention (and brand) building. To cap it, the numbers just keep rising but then i&#39;m working in an industry that&#39;s way behind the curve so there&#39;s plenty to go at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark - we&#39;re pretty much at the point where we can get ads in RSS. It&#39;s inevitable.<br />
RSS gets counted as part of &#39;readership.&#39;<br />
Personally, I prefer to think brand first. I don&#39;t care if only 100 readers turn up (it&#39;s actually a lot more) at my place becasue those that do are therer for a reason. And I have a pretty good idea who they are. Virtually every post draws at least one comment these days so that&#39;s attention (and brand) building. To cap it, the numbers just keep rising but then i&#39;m working in an industry that&#39;s way behind the curve so there&#39;s plenty to go at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hyndman</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/09/30/blogging-101-building-brand-vs-traffic/#comment-1868</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hyndman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=1798#comment-1868</guid>
		<description>Mark, I think a nice compromise is to let sites you admire **occasionally** republish something you write that fits their niche.  The "occasionally" part just depends on the particular circumstances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, I think a nice compromise is to let sites you admire **occasionally** republish something you write that fits their niche.  The &#8220;occasionally&#8221; part just depends on the particular circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/09/30/blogging-101-building-brand-vs-traffic/#comment-1867</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=1798#comment-1867</guid>
		<description>If you&#39;re trying to make money through advertising, you want to put ads in your feed. MHO.
Thanks for the Rmail mention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#39;re trying to make money through advertising, you want to put ads in your feed. MHO.<br />
Thanks for the Rmail mention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
