Ever found yourself killing time somewhere, and wondered if you could read my blog on a wireless device? Well, lucky you because Plusmo.com has introduced a new service to easily create mobile blogs. Wonders never cease! There's a Plusmo chicket on my blog. (I found out about Plusmo after its CEO, Krisha Vedati, sent me an e-mail that include a customized logo. Savvy marketing move.
Nicholas Carr vs. Jimmy Wales
Nicholas
Carr has been a loud and constant critic of Wikipedia.com. His latest lament against
the online encyclopedia – “The death
of Wikipedia” laments the fact there are now controls on who can write
and edit entries – something Jimmy
Wales describes as “semi-protection”. I can see both sides of the
argument but Carr's problems with Wikipedia boil down to Wales' role in
the encyclopedia's future. As a living breathing online organism, Wikipedia
thrives and grows because it's a community entity that leverages the power of
the Web and the willingness of people to freely contribute. The key question is
whether Wales
should continue to be Wikipedia's benevolent dictator? Is his
“guidance” still needed even though Wikipedia has become a large and
increasing prominent entity? While Wales will always be involved in one way,
shape or form, it's probably time for him to move on and let Wikipedia walk on
its own. Wales,
after all, has moved into the commercial market with Wikia, which provides a
Wiki platform supported – at least for the time being – by Google AdSense. With
Wikia poised for growth, it's time for Wales to leave Wikipedia behind. He
did a great job nurturing it, and it has become a wonderful online resource but
sooner or later, you have to let the kids leave home.
Addendum: Ross Mayfield
offers up a short, but cutting, rebuttal to Carr's claims – highlighted by these
bon mots: “sensational stuff as always, but factually wrong as usual”.
Vonage Canada: Subscriber Mystery Solved
Ever wondered about Vonage Canada's subscriber base? I've asked senior management on a regular basis for a number – even a ballpark number – but got nowhere. The answer, I think, is about 52,000, which is much higher than anyone estimated given the scuttlebutt was 15,000 to 20,000. So where does the 52,000 figure come from? Well, if you read through to the end of Vonage's S-1 filing, the company breaks out its Canadian and U.K.sales. In the first-quarter, Canadian sales were $4.25-million. You divide that number by Vonage's average revenue per subscriber ($27 a month X three months) and, voila, 52,000 customers. One thing that is a bit of a puzzler is it appears Vonage Canada has had tremendous momentum in the last quarter or two because sales for all of last year were US$7.6-million, which works out to about 23,000 subscribers using the $27 ARPU figure x 12 months.
Update: My Financial Post story on Vonage's first day of trading can be found here. The Streetcom's Jim Kramer has a rant about Vonage, in which he concludes it is a “piece of junk”.
Update II: Vonage shares down another 11% today to $13.17, which means it has lost 23% from the IPO price, or a cool $575-million. closed down $1.85 to $13 so the value of the company has dropped by $588-million in two days. Yikes! Buying opportunity or dead dog?
Vonage IPO: Let the Fun Begin
Update III: Vonage shares closed down $2.15 at $14.85 on volume of 33.8 million shares.
Update II: Vonage shares have dropped by $2.50 to $14.50 in active trading – perhaps justifying the views of critics who questioned how a money-losing compoany in an ultra competitive business could value itself at $2.5-billion. Still, it is surprisingly to see Vonage tumble so much given investment bankers are supposed to “leave money on the table” for IPO investors.
So the Vonage IPO has been priced at $17 a share, which will bring in IPO proceeds of $531-million. Any bets on where this baby closes after its first day on the NYSE? My guess is up, way up as retail investors pile into the game. After that, it really hinges on Vonage's quarterly results over the next year. If the company's expensive marketing bonanza isn't offset by strong gains in subscribers, watch out! If, however, Vonage's financials show signs of improvement, it could incite investors to jump onboard. That said, Vonage is facing intense competition from cablecos, carriers, Skype, etc.. This means it can't pull back on the marketing engine to boost the bottom line. At the end of the day, the corporate “strategy” may be to attract enough customers to solicit a takeover bid. If anything, Jeff Citron (who has already hit two entrepreneurial “home runs” with Datek and The Island ECN) is super-savvy so the IPO may be part of his Vonage master plan, which has already made him more than $800 million – at least on paper.
Update: Entrepreneurship Blog suggests Vonage could go through its IPO proceeds of $531-million in 7.5 quarters given its burn rate. That's asssuming, of course, the company doesn't attract any more customers. Meanwhile, The Tech Beat questions why investors are more excited about the Vonage IPO than that of MasterCard, which made $319-million in the past 12 months.
Some VC here, Some VC there
While Vonage will no doubt hog the VOIP spotlight today, Ottawa-based SIPQuest has some good news with a US$7-million private equity deal from BC Venture Capital, Covington Capital and Skypoint. SIPQuest, now known as FirstHand Technologies, provides mobile VOIP software for enterprise use. Meanwhile, Vancouver-based Zeugma Systems Inc. has raised US$13.5-million from Granite Ventures, Ventures West, Yaletown Venture Partners and GrowthWorks Capital. Zeugma is developing technoloy for next-generation, broadband networks.
I Want a "Q"
Is the Motorola “Q”, the Blackberry-killer? Well, we'll find out next week when it's finally launched in the U.S. Verizon will sell the “Q” for $199.99 after a $100 rebate. While the “Q” could join the long list of Blackberry challengers that fell by the wayside, I'm curious to give it a whirl. Mipscan believes that the Blackberry will continue to be superior in the mobile e-mail market as long as the Treo and Q lack push e-mail. As a bonus, he also provides a joke about the Q that children love. Jupiter's Michael Gartenberg also provides a good review on the Q and its features.