<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Matt Takes Some VC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/04/13/matt-takes-some-vc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/04/13/matt-takes-some-vc/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/04/13/matt-takes-some-vc/#comment-1343</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 02:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=1451#comment-1343</guid>
		<description>The business model for blog software isn&#39;t totally clear yet.  I have paid for Movable Type on my other blogs, but Wordpress leaves MT in the dust, both from capability and user interface perspective.  I&#39;d say Matt is on the right track by taking it easy, and building a base of users.  Blogger has been a death warrant for Google, and WP would be the ideal fix.
Hope to see you all at MESH.
Colin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The business model for blog software isn&#39;t totally clear yet.  I have paid for Movable Type on my other blogs, but Wordpress leaves MT in the dust, both from capability and user interface perspective.  I&#39;d say Matt is on the right track by taking it easy, and building a base of users.  Blogger has been a death warrant for Google, and WP would be the ideal fix.<br />
Hope to see you all at MESH.<br />
Colin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
