<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The RIAA&#39;s Russian Nemesis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/03/30/the-riaas-russian-nemesis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/03/30/the-riaas-russian-nemesis/</link>
	<description>A Canadian Take on the Web</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/03/30/the-riaas-russian-nemesis/#comment-1278</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=1418#comment-1278</guid>
		<description>I disagree with your comment that the media levy system "doesn&#39;t work" because it&#39;s not stopping people from downloading music.
Provided that the levy money is getting to the content distributors and (more importantly) the artists, I&#39;d say the levy is doing exactly what it was intended to do: Compensate content providers for losses incured by consumers freely sharing their content.
(Although even that statement is difficult to proove)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with your comment that the media levy system &#8220;doesn&#39;t work&#8221; because it&#39;s not stopping people from downloading music.<br />
Provided that the levy money is getting to the content distributors and (more importantly) the artists, I&#39;d say the levy is doing exactly what it was intended to do: Compensate content providers for losses incured by consumers freely sharing their content.<br />
(Although even that statement is difficult to proove)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
