<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcast Hype Alive &#38; Well</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/02/28/podcast-hype-alive-well/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/02/28/podcast-hype-alive-well/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/02/28/podcast-hype-alive-well/#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 05:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=1351#comment-1161</guid>
		<description>Hey Mark ... get with it! (said with a joking tone - that would be easy to detect in a podcast).
I think podcasts are great.   Okay, I may be a bit geeky, but the spoken word can convey so much more than the written word alone, and I can take it all in while I am doing other things - like driving.  Some of the hardware technology needs to become more ubiquitous for Podcasts to become even more pervasive.   For example; I would love to have a USB docking port as standard equipment in my car for my MP3 player, so that I could simply plug that puppy in and listen to my podcasts while I drive.  All of this is possible today, but it is not as convenient as I would like.   As for advertising revenues, etc., while ... I don&#39;t  know, but I would rather listen to selected Podcasts that I subscribe to, on the way into work than CDs, radio, or even satellite radio.
Of course there is a bit of hype here.  But let me be a little controversial for a moment.   I frankly believe that this Web2.0 stuff that a lot of your readers seem so excited about, is more hype than substance as well.   Let&#39;s be honest; a lot of it does seem like 1999 regurgitated all over again.  That being said, there is enough new value / substance in the recent Web changes that we should pay attention to it - even though nobody has been able to succinctly describe what it really is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mark &#8230; get with it! (said with a joking tone - that would be easy to detect in a podcast).<br />
I think podcasts are great.   Okay, I may be a bit geeky, but the spoken word can convey so much more than the written word alone, and I can take it all in while I am doing other things - like driving.  Some of the hardware technology needs to become more ubiquitous for Podcasts to become even more pervasive.   For example; I would love to have a USB docking port as standard equipment in my car for my MP3 player, so that I could simply plug that puppy in and listen to my podcasts while I drive.  All of this is possible today, but it is not as convenient as I would like.   As for advertising revenues, etc., while &#8230; I don&#39;t  know, but I would rather listen to selected Podcasts that I subscribe to, on the way into work than CDs, radio, or even satellite radio.<br />
Of course there is a bit of hype here.  But let me be a little controversial for a moment.   I frankly believe that this Web2.0 stuff that a lot of your readers seem so excited about, is more hype than substance as well.   Let&#39;s be honest; a lot of it does seem like 1999 regurgitated all over again.  That being said, there is enough new value / substance in the recent Web changes that we should pay attention to it - even though nobody has been able to succinctly describe what it really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
