<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nortel Considers Share Reversal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/02/16/nortel-considers-share-reversal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/02/16/nortel-considers-share-reversal/</link>
	<description>Insight and Analysis from North of the Border</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.markevanstech.com/2006/02/16/nortel-considers-share-reversal/#comment-1098</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markevanstech.com/?p=1324#comment-1098</guid>
		<description>Great idea! Rather than tackling the difficult task of turning around the company, we&#39;ll just reverse split and just maybe the stock will double in price. Or not!
-Randy
P.S. not joking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea! Rather than tackling the difficult task of turning around the company, we&#39;ll just reverse split and just maybe the stock will double in price. Or not!<br />
-Randy<br />
P.S. not joking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
